|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:20 AM Original message |
For the umpteen millionth time on DU, STATES CANNOT RECALL SENATORS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. The only way to recall them is to vote them out in the next election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
2. First I heard of it here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I've read the ridiculous calls to "recall Lieberman" for years here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I have heard many denunciations of Lieberman here .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
racaulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Here's one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. OK ... There is one .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Unfortunately for you, DU has search capabilities. You want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Unfortunately for me ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. The ignorance of how our government functions is staggering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It saddens me that even DUers don't bother learn these things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Saw one the other day suggesting that Kucinich should filibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:40 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Ugh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:21 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Actually, it was not a sincere suggestion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Sadly, the misinformation held by many DUers, not to mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
6. Well....In that case.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. They would have the authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Hey! I like anchovies on pizza. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. That would indicted a strong sense of lack of cofidence in the electorate. Something that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
10. word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
12. sure, but the Senate did not need to give lieberman a chairmanship did they? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
14. Right we all know that but maybe Connecticut could recall Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melm00se (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
20. one thing the wing nuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
21. Recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
23. Some more conversation on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
24. Another thing, removing his effin' chairmanship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
25. if I could go back in time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
26. Which raises an excellent point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
27. But they can be Impeached..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
28. Imagine a corporation that you couldn't boycott for six years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
29. Well, yeah, if you squint hard and make stuff up, I guess it says that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-18-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Sorry, it's court precedent Rankin v. Church |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 04:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC