|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 01:51 PM Original message |
The "economic crisis" predates September 2007. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. You can also date the radical divergence in income to the Reagan Era |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. The New Gilded Age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes..it all fits. Trickle down, Union busting,offshoring.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. And the real estate, tech, and financial bubbles...etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Where road is going... doesn't look good.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. political fragmentation is more likely than world government nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. your chart shows *number* in poverty over 30 million, not *rate*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. i see what you're saying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. well, I'm sure the answer is to continue Reaganomics as under the last 5 Presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Obama is tonally different, but still very much a neo-liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC