Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNA to clear 200th person (man jailed for almost 25 years)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:53 AM
Original message
DNA to clear 200th person (man jailed for almost 25 years)
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070423/1a_lede23.art.htm

DNA to clear 200th person
Pace picks up on exonerations

By Richard Willing
USA TODAY

A former Army cook who spent nearly 25 years in prison for a rape he did not commit is scheduled today to become the 200th person exonerated by DNA evidence, underscoring the quickening pace of overturned convictions, according to the Innocence Project.

The New York-based legal group says the 100th exoneration occurred in January 2002, 13 years after the first exoneration. It took just more than five years for the number to double.

"Five years ago, people said that the number (of exonerations) was going to dry up because there just weren't many wrongful convictions," said lawyer Barry Scheck, who co-founded the Innocence Project in 1992 to help prisoners prove their innocence through DNA evidence. "But clearly, there are plenty of innocent persons still in prison. There's no way you can look at this data without believing that."

David Lazer, a Harvard University public policy professor who specializes in DNA issues, says improved testing technology and an increase in the number of lawyers who are taking on DNA cases should result in a continued increase in the number of wrongful convictions that are set aside.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Makes you wonder how many people were executed due to faulty evidence
I wonder how sure the "law-and-order, protecting society, pro-death penalty" types feel everytime they see these stories.

I'm sure they console themselves by saying, "The guys that were executed were guilty."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wish our country would have a debate on the death penalty but Dems will
not touch it if they can help it======they are afraid of the soft on crime mantra!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Republican told me "you have to break a lot of eggs to make an omelet" - direct quote
of what they said - scary isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yup, frightens me.
It's the #1 reason I am against the death penalty - I don't trust our system to always be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I bet Barry Scheck is feeling guilty about O.J.
He fought long and hard to dismiss dna evidence in the o.j. trial, now he's a dna freedom fighter. Makes you wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Though this newest technology marvel has it's pros, it also has it cons...
using dna to convict is just as easy in far too many ways that it should scare people as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is why I now oppose capital punishment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why are so many Americans incarcerated?....

A Report on the Injustice System in the USA
Written by: Pauline (a contributing writer to IPFG’s Publication; Payaam Fadaee)
Published in Payame Fadaee, Spring edition 2002

The US ruling class has established the largest forced labour sweatshop system in the world. There are now approximately 2 million inmates in US prisons compared to 1 million in 1994. These prisoners have become a source of billions of dollars in profits. In fact, the US has imprisoned a half million more people than in China which has 5 times the population. California alone has the biggest prison system in the Western industrialized world. It has more prisoners than France, Germany, Great Britain, Japan and Holland combined while these countries have 11 times the population of California. According to official figures, Iran incarcerates 220 citizens per 100,000, compared to US figures of 727. Overall, the total "criminal justice" system in the US, including those in prison, on parole and on probation, is approaching 6,000,000. In the last 20 years, 1000 new prisons have been built; yet they hold double their capacity.
Prisoners, 75% of who are either Black or Hispanic, are forced to work for 20 cents an hour, some even as low as 75 cents a day. They produce everything from eyewear and furniture to vehicle parts and computer software. This has lead to thousands of layoffs and the lowering of the overall wage scale of the entire working class. At Soledad Prison in California, prisoners produce work-shirts exported to Asia as well as El Salvadoran license plates more cheaply than in El Salvador, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere. A May/99 report in the Wall Street Journal summarized that while “more expensive private-sector workers may lose their jobs to prison labour, assigning work to the most cost-efficient producer is good for the economy.” The February/00 Wall Street Journal reported “Prisoners are excluded from employment calculation. And since most inmates are economically disadvantaged and unskilled, jailing so many people has effectively taken a big block of the nation's least-employable citizens out of the equation.”

Federal Prison Industries (FPI) whose trade name is UNICOR exports prisoner-made products as well as selling them to all federal agencies as required by federal law. FPI manufactures over 150 different products in 99 factories in 64 prisons (with 19 new ones on the way) in 30 states. It is the federal government's 35th largest contractor, just behind IBM and is exempt from any federal workplace regulations.
FPI's prison workforce produces 98% of the entire US market for equipment assembly services, 93% of paint and artist brushes, 92% of all kitchen assembly services, 46% of all personal armour, 36% of all household furnishings and 30% of all headset/microphone/speakers, etc. RW.
Feb/00 FPI consistently advertises for companies "interested in leasing a ready-to-run prison industry" especially following congressional testimony in 1996 that reported a "pent-up demand for prison labour." Meanwhile, shareholders profiting from prison labour consistently lobby for the legislation of longer prison sentences in order to expand their workforce. At least 37 states have legalized the contracting out of prison labour to private corporations that have already set up operations inside state prisons. Prisons' business clients include: IBM, Boeing, Motorola Microsoft, AT&T Wireless, Texas Instruments, Dell, Compaq, Honeywell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel, Lucent Technologies, 3Com, Intel, Northern Telecom, TWA, Nordstrom, Revlon, Macys, Pierre Cardin, Target Stores, etc.
http://www.ashrafdehghani.com/articles-english/on%20prison.htm



In 1985 one out of every 320 Americans were in jail.
In 1995 one out of every 167 Americans were in jail.
Between1980 and 1994, the number of people in federal and state prisons increased 221%.
Today, 2 million Americans are in prison.
1.2 million are African-American men.
While there is debate over their underlying causes, these staggering statistics are generally thought to result from rigid drug laws, mandatory minimum sentences and increasingly tough legislation— such as California’s "three strikes" law. One fact remains undisputed: prisons have become big business.

The Business of Prison Labor
A prison-industrial complex has emerged. The increased prison population, a strong economy and the tightest labor market in 30 years have given rise to prison privatization and the expanded use of prison labor. Big name corporations compete with each other to underwrite prison construction with private, tax-exempt bonds and without voter approval. More and more states across the country are implementing mandatory labor for inmates, necessitating partnerships with outside industry. These developments fuel a national debate over prison labor practices in the U.S.
-------------------
Prison Partners
In the tiny town of Lockhart, Texas a private prison run by Wakenhut (a for-profit private corporation) does business with a company called LTI. In this partnership the prisoners assemble circuit boards bound for hi-tech corporations. For LTI, moving manufacturing to the Lockhart prison was a no-brainer. There they found a captive workforce that did not require benefits or vacation pay, major tax incentives and a brand new assembly plant rented for only a symbolic fee. As a result, LTI’s plant in Austin, Texas was shut down and 150 people lost their jobs. In Michigan, through a similar arrangement, the majority of Brill Manufacturing Company’s workforce lost their jobs to state prison inmates.
http://www.itvs.org/shift/prison.html


Captive Labor
America's Prisoner's As Corporate Workforce
By Gordon Lafer The American Prospect, 1 September 1999

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the past 20 years, more than 30 states have enacted laws permitting the use of convict labor by private enterprise. While at present only about 80,000 U.S. inmates are engaged in commercial activity, the rapid growth in America's prison population and the attendant costs of incarceration suggest there will be strong pressures to put more prisoners to work. And it's not hard to figure what corporations like about prison labor: it's vastly cheaper than free labor. In Ohio, for example, a Honda supplier pays its prison workers $2 an hour for the same work for which the UAW has fought for decades to be paid $20 to $30 an hour. Konica has hired prisoners to repair its copiers for less than 50 cents an hour. And in Oregon, private companies can "lease" prisoners for only $3 a day.

But the attractions of prison labor extend well beyond low wages. The prison labor system does away with statutory protections that progressives and unions have fought so hard to achieve over the last 100 years. Companies that use prison labor create islands of time in which, in terms of labor relations at least, it's still the late nineteenth century. Prison employers pay no health insurance, no unemployment insurance, no payroll or Social Security taxes, no workers' compensation, no vacation time, sick leave, or overtime. In fact, to the extent that prisoners have "benefits" like health insurance, the state picks up the tab. Prison workers can be hired, fired, or reassigned at will. Not only do they have no right to organize or strike; they also have no means of filing a grievance or voicing any kind of complaint whatsoever. They have no right to circulate an employee petition or newsletter, no right to call a meeting, and no access to the press. Prison labor is the ultimate flexible and disciplined workforce.

All of these conditions apply when the state administers the prison. But the prospect of such windfall profits from prison labor has also fueled a boom in the private prison industry. Such respected money managers as Allstate, Merrill Lynch, and Shearson Lehman have all invested in private prisons. As with other privatized public services, companies that operate private prisons aim to make money by operating corrections facilities for less than what the state pays them. If they can also contract prisoners out to private enterprises—forcing inmates to work either for nothing or for a very small fraction of their "wages" and pocketing the remainder of those "wages" as corporate profit—they can open up a second revenue stream. That would make private prisons into both public service contractors and the highest-margin temp agencies in the nation.
http://www.postcarbon.org/node/2244



# The Prison Industry Authority (PIA)
# The PIA’s industries produce over 1,400 goods and services including: office furniture, clothing, food products, shoes, printing services, signs, binders, eye wear, gloves, license plates, cell equipment, and much more.
# Up to 40 percent of an inmate’s wages is deducted for court-ordered restitution/fines and is transferred to the Crime Victims’ Restitution Fund. In FY 2005-06, over $700,000 of PIA inmates’ earnings was deposited. Since FY 1992-93, $6.5 million has been deposited to the Fund.
# Inmates receive wages of $.30 to $.95 per hour before deductions.
# The PIA maintains an “electronic catalog” of products which is available online at www.pia.ca.gov.
# A study in 2002 by the University of California, Berkeley, calculated PIA’s contribution to California’s economy. The study found that through its production and sales and the purchase of supplies from the private sector, PIA has a positive effect on the State’s economy. PIA’s impact consequently produced an increase of jobs and sales in California’s private sector.
# The Prison Industry Board (PIB) was established to oversee the operations of PIA, much like a corporate board of directors. The 11-member Board sets general policy for PIA, oversees the performance of existing PIA industries, determines which new industries shall be established, approves its annual plan, and appoints and monitors the performance of the General Manager. The Board also serves as a public hearing body charged with ensuring that PIA enterprises do not create a substantial adverse impact on California industry.



Due to the history of the private prison management experience in Texas, colleagues frequently call upon TDCJ officials from other states and countries for information or just compare notes on the prison privatization experience. We welcome this exchange and opportunity for criminal justice practitioners to advance the profession. Over the seventeen years that privately managed prisons have been operating in Texas, we have learned the need to better define expectations. Also, as corrections is a dynamic profession, new issues arise from time to time that were not anticipated under the original terms of the contract. The resolution of these issues takes the cooperative efforts of all contracted parties in forging a true public/private partnership.

Private Sector/Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (PS/PIECP), commonly referred to as a PIE Program. The program is exempt from federal constraints placed on offender-made goods and on the sale of such goods both in interstate commerce and to the federal government. Offenders participating in the PIE program agree to pay a percentage of their earned income for room and board, cost of supervision, restitution, crime victim’s compensation, savings, and dependent care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. The best argument against the death penalty i can think of. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Can not understand
why some states still resist the law they want passed, that everyone who was convicted can have DNA evidence reviewed.

Why does a state resist. I know if I were a prosecutor, and a person was convicted, I would welcome a form of evidence to be presented that would prove or disapprove their conviction. So what if they were wrong. Years ago they went with the evidence they had and sometimes it pointed to that person. But if they could be proved innocent, I would be elated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ah, me! When are we going to realize what a brutal--and self-brutalizing--act it is
for the state to commit cold-blooded murder against any person. It is the dark fascist view of the world that criminals are irredeemable. You can never, ever make that assumption about someone--no matter how violent, or insane, they may be. That is God's judgement to make, not ours. We are not God. We can NEVER know what is really going on in the soul of a criminal, nor can we EVER have a justice system so perfect that it does not inflict cold-blooded state murder on completely innocent people. Where did we ever get this idea? In fact, our justice system is so IMPERFECT, right now, that injustice is GUARANTEED. When was a rich man ever sent to the death chamber?

You only have to contemplate George Bush and Alberto Gonzales and their heinous death chamber operation in Texas to know where this assertion of state OMNIPOTENCE leads: to sadism, and torture, and thence to the casual slaughter of over half a million people in Iraq for their oil.

It is our obligation, as fallible human beings, to sustain life in hope of redemption, and to require wise and healing punishments for those who have broken laws and/or harmed others. Restitution and community service, where possible. Assistance to create a better life, since most of the people in jail are there for being poor, more than anything else. This is not to say that we can't or shouldn't protect ourselves from violent criminals. Of course we should. But if we spent only a fraction of the money that Bush has squandered on slaughtering innocent people in Iraq, on poverty prevention and on a better atmosphere and healing programs in prisons, we would be a lot safer in every way, not to mention the ethical and moral improvement in changing our attitude toward the imprisoned and the condemned. Are we a progressive society, or not? That is the question we need to ask. Has George Bush's dark, psychotic, fascist view of the world succeeded here? Or do we reject it and seek something better?

How many innocent people have we killed in state death chambers? We don't even know. But that is just half of the problem--condemning innocent people to death, because they didn't have the means to prove their innocence. The other half is the brutalization of our culture with the attitude that killing people solves problems.

Kudos and laurel wreaths to those who have fought so hard--against overwhelming odds--to expose the first part of the problem: innocents condemned to death. Now we need to work on the second part: Who the hell do we think we are, to deliberately, methodically, coldly snuff out ANYONE's life?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I just read the statistics above on prisoner-workers. How appalling this is!
My jaw just dropped to the floor, reviewing these stats.

I think this may be even worse than the death penalty--creating an imprisoned workforce with absolutely no human, civil or labor rights--although the two things go together. The brutalization of cold-blooded state murder, and the gulag of prisoner-workers. Are we any better than Stalinist Russia? These medieval institutions--the global corporate predators who are oppressing us all, in so many ways, from unjust war to highway robbery against the poor and middle class--need to be dismantled, along with dismantling much of the prison system, and removing laws and judges that incarcerate people for little or no cause.

But first: We need to restore our right to vote! Rightwing Bushite corporations now control the counting of our votes, with 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, and virtually no audit/recount controls--a fascist coup that occurred during the 2002 to 2004 period. And until we restore vote counting that everyone can see and understand, we are nearly powerless to enact any reform.

Priority no. 1: Transparent elections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC