Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists turn stem cells into pork

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:22 PM
Original message
Scientists turn stem cells into pork
Scientists turn stem cells into pork

By MARIA CHENG, AP Medical Writer Maria Cheng, Ap Medical Writer – Fri Jan 15, 1:13 pm ET

LONDON – Call it pork in a petri dish — a technique to turn pig stem cells into strips of meat that scientists say could one day offer a green alternative to raising livestock, help alleviate world hunger, and save some pigs their bacon.

Dutch scientists have been growing pork in the laboratory since 2006, and while they admit they haven't gotten the texture quite right or even tasted the engineered meat, they say the technology promises to have widespread implications for our food supply.

"If we took the stem cells from one pig and multiplied it by a factor of a million, we would need one million fewer pigs to get the same amount of meat," said Mark Post, a biologist at Maastricht University involved in the In-vitro Meat Consortium, a network of publicly funded Dutch research institutions that is carrying out the experiments.

Post describes the texture of the meat as sort of like scallop, firm but a little squishy and moist. That's because the lab meat has less protein content than conventional meat.

Several other groups in the U.S., Scandinavia and Japan are also researching ways to make meat in the laboratory, but the Dutch project is the most advanced, said Jason Matheny, who has studied alternatives to conventional meat at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore and is not involved in the Dutch research.

In the U.S., similar research was funded by NASA, which hoped astronauts would be able to grow their own meat in space. But after growing disappointingly thin sheets of tissue, NASA gave up and decided it would be better for its astronauts to simply eat vegetarian.

more...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100115/ap_on_he_me/eu_med_petri_pork


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, well enough about Rush Limbaugh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want real dead pig dammit! Not test tube fake pig!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Never. Ever. It's 'interesting'. It was on 'Better Off Ted'. That's as far as I go.
If I have to move out to the boonies and go all 'Grizzly Adams' to get real meat, then so be it. I will never eat synthetic meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. So if the fake meat has less protein than real meat, what would be the point of eating it?
Isn't that why people eat meat, for the protein?

Now if they could get all the protein without the fat or cholesterol, that might be useful. But it would still probably be the type of stuff you could make sausage from or use in some sort of stir fry or whatever. Doubt you would ever get a decent pork chop, ham, or bacon out of this process. Or a decent steak, when they get around to making fake beef.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No People Eat Tasty Animals, because they are tasty.
Also people today, don't get fat and die simply because of their fatty diets. They get fat and die, because their modern lifestyle doesn't burn the fat they do consume. Instead their bodies do exactly what they evolved to do. Put that fat aside for those lean times that nowadays never come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. It tastes like DESPAIR
Seriously thats gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jayzusss...
...I just threw up in my mouth a little.

TYY

:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. so now we have "Soylent Pork"?
Ah, the wonders of science....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Personally, I pefer Makin' Bacon the old-fashioned way.
If you know what I mean.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. McDonald's got there first.
You don't think the McRib was made from an animal, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yehaw. I keep waiting for this
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 11:50 PM by Juche
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIjanhKqVC4

Factory farming is pretty bad. It causes a lot of psychological pain for animals, and is one of the biggest causes of environmental damage.

Livestock produces more greenhouse gas (in the form of methane) than all transportation (in the form of CO2). Cows and pigs contribute more to global climate change than SUVs.

In vitro meat will save animals from suffering, help clean up the environment and drive down the cost of meat (which will help poor people in developing nations get more protein in their diets).

Not only that, but much of our corn is used to feed livestock. With synthetic meat (which is more efficient), you do not need as much raw materials to grow the meat. It will drive down the cost of corn and make more available to people who really need it in Asia & Africa.

I don't understand why anyone who examined this issue would be opposed to this.


Cheaper, more available food
Less environmental damage
Less animal suffering



What is the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC