Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:14 PM
Original message |
Brad Friedman on the Malloy show now - addressing Diebolding of Massachusettes election |
|
Listen up. This is why the polls have been favoring the naked teabagging dipshit. It's already in the bag.
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Take off the tin foil.. if we lose in MA it will be our own fault for not putting up a real Dem cand |
iceman66
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Keep drinking the kool aid! |
|
Coakley is a "real" Democratic candidate, who, unlike her opponent, has already won statewide office in MA by a wide margin.
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yawn ... you're the one on the Kool Aid pal.. |
|
they are voting against the DLC and corporatist health care.
|
iceman66
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. By electing a candidate who is even more corporatist, |
|
when Coakley herself is a liberal, not even a moderate or 'blue dog'?
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. nope she's a Rahm Emanuel special.. actually it means corporatist health care giveaway gets killed. |
iceman66
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Have you looked at her record at all, |
|
or are you just parroting what your media heroes tell you to think?
If this bill is so bad, why did EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT in the Senate vote for it? Or is every one of them a "Rahm Emanuel special" too?
|
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
A tin foil hat, or blinders?
Just wondering... :eyes:
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. looks like you're wearing both so why choose. |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. It only looks that way because you haven't taken off your blinders... |
|
Meanwhile, I really don't value what you think you know.
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. lame trash talk.. you lose.. |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Hey, whatever makes you feel right... |
|
Meanwhile, you might want to empty that "trash" yourself on the way to looking into black box voting and examining the history of election fraud. Yeah, real tin foil hat stuff...
You're such a winner!
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. I agree that Coakley is a weak, insurance corporate loving, RomneyCare shilling candidate |
|
But that doesn't mean electro-fraud still won't happen. Actually it increases the probability of fraud, because the only thing that prevents fraud is high turnout.
|
BeFree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He is a DU veteran who knows what's happening with the computers counting our votes: they steal them.
The more people who raise cain about their votes, the less they can steal. That is what you can do: raise cain!!
The vote you save may be your own.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
12. So we have Diebold employees here now? |
|
Unrecs for a thread warning about the VERY REAL chance of another stolen election?
Really?
Which one of you chickenshit cowards will admit to that?
|
cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. I unrecc'd it. The OP stated in no uncertain terms that the election was already "IN THE BAG". |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 10:56 PM by cherokeeprogressive
It's not. Coakley will win. I'm sure though, that we won't see the OP here tomorrow night saying "Okay, I was wrong".
There is a "very real chance" that an object formed over 13 billion years ago somewhere else in the newly born universe could crash smack dab into your house next Thursday. It's not likely, but the "chance" exists.
Saying the election is "in the bag" is nothing more than alarmist bullshit in my opinion, so I unrecc'd this post.
Lastly, I'm not a chickenshit coward. But thanks for playing.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Have you read Brad Friedman's article, or anything regarding election fraud at BradBlog.com? |
|
I suggest you do some reading before you dismiss any possibility of such treacherous shit occurring.
www.bradblog.com
|
cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Yeah, we'll see if you're standing on the rooftop crowing about Diebold after Coakley wins. |
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. If she wins, it will be because the turnout was high enough to beat the fraud. |
|
Much like the 2008 election.
|
CK_John
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. BradBlog is fixate on a myth. Voters who don't read and follow directions spoil ballots. n/t |
ElmoBlatz
(149 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Democrats own the Government in Mass |
|
EVERY part of it. If we manage to have this stolen from us, we deserve our fate.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. Which is why there were two Repuke governors in recent history. |
|
The last one being a carpetbagging dog abusing holy underwear wearing corporate raiding freak wackjob.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |