Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palast: "Gonzales is getting Libby'd" (taking the fall for Rove & Bush)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 01:28 PM
Original message
Palast: "Gonzales is getting Libby'd" (taking the fall for Rove & Bush)
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 01:31 PM by StefanX
We’ve been here before. Gonzales is getting Libby’d. Takes the bullet for Karl Rove and the White House. If you wondered why the Republican jackals like the sinister Senator Specter piled on Gonzales — it’s because they were told to.

These guys learned from Richard Nixon. In 1973, when Nixon was getting hammered over Watergate, he threw the Senate Committee his Attorney General, a schmuck named Richard Kleindienst. Famously, Nixon’s own Rove, a devious creep named John Erlichman, told Nixon to leave the Attorney General “twisting slowly in the wind.”

Rove and Bush are doing the Nixon Twist on Gonzales.


via Digby:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/job-description-lighting-rod-by-digby.html

But fortunately, one of the fired US Attorneys (Iglesias) was smart enough to take the fight directly to Rove:

Iglesias said that on April 3, he filed a Hatch Act complaint with the OSC, charging that Karl Rove and others may have violated the law by firing him over his failure to initiate partisan-motivated prosecutions.

via Americablog:
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2007/04/david-iglesias-filed-complaint-that.html

Pass the popcorn! And remember, if US Attorneys "serve at the pleasure of the President", then only the President can fire them. Which means Bush did it. Bush is guilty of electoral fraud. He fired attorneys in order to swing election results. It's that simple. And it's an impeachable offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. "twisting slowly, slowly in the wind."
It's the second slowly that made it immortal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
for impeachment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seemed clear to me Gonzo was falling on his sword.
You gotta wonder what he was promised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gonzo may not be the brightest man in the world but..
NOBODY can forget that much, so soon. His "my hard job makes me forget" didn't work...it only sounded lame. There's no explanation, unless he was protecting someone, and that someone has to be Rove. What was (one of) the stated reasons some of the USA's were fired? If you answered "failing to aggressively prosecute voter fraud" you get a gold star.

Gonzo was simultaneously trying to protect himself and his job, AND protect Rove. He couldn't do both. His "I don't recalls" made him sound clueless and incompetent, but he didn't give Rove up. THAT's why Shrub was happy with his testimony. He did what was expected of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC