Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calif. high court strikes down medical pot limits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:17 PM
Original message
Calif. high court strikes down medical pot limits
Calif. high court strikes down medical pot limits

By PAUL ELIAS
The Associated Press
Thursday, January 21, 2010; 2:55 PM


SAN FRANCISCO -- A unanimous California Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a law that sought to impose limits on the amount of marijuana a medical patient can legally possess.

The California Supreme Court ruled that state lawmakers were wrong to change provisions of the voter-approved Proposition 215. The 1996 measure allowed for patients with a doctor's recommendation to possess an unspecified amount of marijuana.

The Legislature, seeking to give law enforcement guidance on when to make marijuana possession arrests, mandated in 2003 that each patient could have a maximum of 8 ounces of dried marijuana.

The high court says only voters can change amendments that they've added to California's constitution through the initiative process. The ruling by Chief Justice Ron George left in place the portion of the new law that protects patients possessing a state-issue medical marijuana identification card from arrest. George did note, though, that police were still authorized to make arrests if they believe the cards to be forgeries or reasonably suspects a crime has been committed.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012102690.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick & Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. One more step toward legalization
And balanced budgets forever thanks to the new weed tax.

They should have done this 50 years ago, but I'm glad they seem to be moving in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. State tax is under consideration.
Some cities like Oaksterdam (Oakland) have a local tax of $50 per ounce. At about $360 an ounce at local dispensaries, that's about a 14% tax. I can live with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hot diggity. Maybe in my lifetime...
What's funny is that both Mr. H and I have conditions that make us eligible for medical pot, but we don't smoke -- anything. However, if it were legal to do so, I think I'd grow a plant or two in my herb garden.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC