cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 07:37 PM
Original message |
Tell Rupert Murdoch's WSJ what you think of the fascist takeover by SCOTUS! |
|
http://online.wsj.com/community/groups/question-day-229/topics/do-you-agree-supreme-courtsCurrently showing: Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision to strike down limits on corporate political spending? NO - 74.2% (512 votes) YES - 25.8% (178 votes) ------------------ DU! Go ahead and hammer this poll!
|
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Done and some great comments further down...n/t |
Oceansaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision to strike down limits on corporate political spending?
yes--- 178
no---- 516
|
ThatsMyBarack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Are we supposed to say YES or NO? |
|
The question is really confusing. Hurts my brain.
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. No is the answer, corporations should be limited if not prohibited from contributing... |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 07:52 PM by cascadiance
They are NOT people and shouldn't be allowed to influence voting as "persons". The constitution doesn't give them rights to free speech, despite the justices claiming they do have these rights who also claim to be "constitutional constructionists".
|
ThatsMyBarack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
PADemD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message |