Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking - unemployment is now below 10% - 9.7%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:40 AM
Original message
Breaking - unemployment is now below 10% - 9.7%
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 08:51 AM by malaise
from CSpan 1

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/02/obama-gets-good-news-jobless-rate-down-to-97-percent/1
<snip>
Some good economic news for Obama: The unemployment rate has dropped to 9.7 percent, no longer in double digits.

Last month's number was 10 percent.

Obama is expected to address the jobs issue today when he meets with a group of small business owners in Lanham, Maryland.
--------------

add
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. not in michigannnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. nor in Florida
it's about 12% here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Heard a talking head on ABC this AM say that is was going to stay at 10% or higher
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 08:43 AM by liberal N proud
January unemployment rate dips to 9.7%

The jobless rate drops unexpectedly from 10 percent while employers shed 20,000 jobs.

The Labor Department says the rate dropped because a survey of households found the number of employed Americans rose by 541,000. The job losses are calculated from a separate survey of employers.

More soon at: http://www.latimes.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. You should only be worried when a talking head
gets it right. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you hear erin burnett hang the negative spin on this?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. No but I'm hardly surprised
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Fascism can be beautiful too!
Goldman-Sachs alum and free trader. Spokesperson for the corporate politburo. Piece of executive boot-shiner garbage, just like 85% of the people anchoring for that odious network (CNBC). I occasionally un-mute it to catch some smiling corporate/outsourcing defense. When my threshold has been reached, BACK it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. She's cute but evil..
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. not in Oregon :(
but good news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Lots of people getting jobs working the french fry lines
I know plenty of young people with college degrees flipping the proverbial burgers as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. The failmonger GOPers will say it should be below 6%.
Regardless its good news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. CSpan discussing this now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Traitorous freepers will not like this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. It's propaganda none the less
They took out people from the labor force to arrive at the number. The report itself says payrolls shrunk in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I thought you had a big long ass thread where you said you were leaving here for a while?
Just couldn't help yourself could ya?

It must be like a reflex.

:rofl:

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I've been gone for almost 2 months
Don't worry, I'll be going back after today. Actually I'll be going back to where I normally post after 11am this morning. I have to go to the State Democratic Party convention today.

The last two days, made me want to see some old friends, and people who absolutely hate me.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #20
41. Huh?? Reflex??? After all this time?? Would you suggest really slow reflexes??
Quite a few I saw post they were right around that same time who've been back a while. It's funny I haven't seen you posting about their reflexes.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. They played with the numbers
The report itself says that payrolls did not increase...they just added more discouraged workers to get the number to go down.

There are a few small bright spots in the report, overall, it's a steaming pile of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Yep I just discovered that too.
Sigh... I'm going to bed before I try to read any more of the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. Funny how that number works, 9.7 unemployed,
Yet we lost another 20,000 jobs last month. Let me guess, they're cooking the books by moving the numbers into the "discouraged worker" category, which they don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Ding Ding Ding
We lost more than 20,000 jobs as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Hey there, good to see you back again.
Hope you had a nice break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I won't be around for long
Just thought I'd pipe in yesterday and today.

I was guessing they were going to cook the books on this report at the beginning of the week. The administration has no problem creating good news when it needs it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Yea, President Obama put a bunch of Muslin terra-ists in charge of the Bureau Of Labor Statistics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. They played with the numbers
Don,

Why don't you read the report and tell me what the good news is in it and not the shiny U3 numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Have they not always played with the numbers? Didn't Bush play with the numbers?
I suspect the numbers are played with, and always have been.

But lets not play apples against oranges, if there's the played with numbers and the real numbers, the point is still the same:

Some progress, reduction in the number, fudged as it may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Democracy only works
When people have an informed position to make decisions. Barack Obama's administration continuing to shape government reports to fit their reality, instead of actual reality, is a disappointment to say the least, and like his predecessor, the truth is in plain site for the investor class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. No the amount of the fudge is greater than the progress.
"Unemployment U3" fell by 0.3% from peak which equals = 450,000 people however to accomplish that stat the labor force was shrunk by 3 million people.

So to make it look like unemployment is half a million people less bad they had to remove 3 million unemployed from the workforce.

When the amount of the fudge is greater than the net gain that means the real numbers got worse not better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. Thanks, Statistical.
I always trust your numbers, and the interpretations thereof.

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Generally I defend U3 numbers but this one is brazen.
I mean I might be wrong but I just don't honestly believe a net 3 million people left the workforce in last year.

If they didn't then that manipulation dwarfs the improved employment numbers of 500K.

Then again maybe I am wrong and a net 3 million people DID leave the workforce (died, retired, went to prison, became disabled, etc) I just think it is very "lucky" for the administration that it happened because it reduced unemployment by about 1.8%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Besides the died, retired, went to prison, a lot of people are working under the table too
Happens during every recession. Very common. Lot of times people end up making more that way than they did with a real job.

I am sure this is part of it.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Funny, you know you were one of the ones who were, rightfully, claiming cooked books under Bush
Yet when it is plain as the nose on your face that they're doing the same under Obama, you stick your head in the sand and enter a state of denial.

Get this, the government, whether it's been Democratic or Republican, has been cooking the books on unemployment since the days of Reagan. It has been standard practice to move people into that "discouraged workers" category in order to make the U3 number look better. It has also been standard practice to use those fatally flawed methods of doing the household count, which we all know are horribly inaccurate.

So tell me, how do the numbers of unemployed people go up by 20,000 while somehow, miraculously the percentage figure goes down.

If you believe these figures I've got a bridge I want to sell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. That was before TahtiNut enlightened me how the system worked
I was ignorant about the workings of the Bureau Of Labor Statistics before that. I remember the thread well. After that my opinion changed.

Hell, I learn something new around here every day.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
43. To be fair, that is a Bush-Republicon strategery
The Republicons are the clowns who thought up the discouraged workers ruse -- so they will just be their usual hypocritical selves if they start whining about it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Actually doctoring the unemployment figures started under Reagan
And it has continued ever since. Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, and now Obama have all cooked the books on unemployment numbers, every single one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:02 AM
Original message
My son has had 3 different interviews this past week after months of nothing. One even said
they were expanding and expecting to hire about 150 by the end of summer. Fingers crossed here:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
38. Best of luck to your son! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. bullshit!
I do not believe that for a second.

The unemployment numbers put out simply ignore a vast pool of labor that has been without jobs for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. but chuck chode says there's still bad news.....
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 09:24 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. That just means fewer people are eligible for unemployment.
They still haven't found jobs let alone long term, steady, well paying jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. No--that isn't what the numbers mean. That isn't how the stats are computed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Or 30% under GOP leadership. Democrats always have to clean up their disasters.
Thats damn good for one year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
32. No, no it's not. Actually, there was an almost 1% increase in NSA U-3 from Dec.
An acceleration, not a slowing.

Better luck next month!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
33. So $20K more jobs loss yet UE falls 0.3% = 450K people. BS
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 09:47 AM by Statistical
Unless a lot of working age people died, went to Prison, or simply vanished I am calling BS.
Someone is gaming the numbers to say YAY unemployment in the 9% range.


On edit: on antoher thread someone showed where the game is being played. The "workforce" = people willing and able to work has "shrunk" by 3 million people from 153 million to 150 million.

If you calculate the number employed and apply that to larger more realistic size of workforce then U3 is 11.5%.

The administration is essentially hiding 3 million undesirables because 11.5% unemployment would look bad.

No way 3 million people just suddenly become unwilling or unable to work. Work force participation is relatively steady at 66% until recently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. The chocolate ration increased from 20 grams to 15 grams this month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
34. Wait a month for the adjustment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. a few people were hired around here but....
there`s still around 6,000 still unemployed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
40. "Figures don't lie, but liars can figure"
"There's lies, damned lies and statistics"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
44. I am sure this is awful news somehow. Everything is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
46. and you can believe them this time!
Really!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC