Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Frist won't be charged in stock sale

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:24 AM
Original message
Frist won't be charged in stock sale
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Securities and Exchange Commission has decided not to file insider-trading charges against former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in connection with the sales of stock in the hospital chain his family owns, The Washington Post reported Friday.
An 18-month investigation by the SEC staff and the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York ended without action against the Tennessee Republican, the Post reported.

Frist had a formal interview with Justice Department and SEC lawyers to address the stock sales in late January, the Post reported, citing unidentified sources.

In a statement, Frist said he had "acted properly" and that his only reason for selling HCA Inc. stock in his trust accounts was to "eliminate the appearance of a conflict of interest."

Frist spokesman Matt Lehigh said the doctor would not comment beyond the statement.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Republican | Senate
The sales came in 2005 as Frist was weighing whether to run for the Republican nomination for president, which he eventually decided against. When the sales came to light, he denied having any insider information about HCA.

"I've always conducted myself according to the highest ethical standards in both my personal and public life, and my family and I are pleased that this matter has been resolved," he said in the statement.

Federal officials in September 2005 opened the investigation into Frist's sales of all his stock in HCA, the Nashville-based company his father and brother founded. The sales were completed by July 1, 2005, two weeks before share prices fell 9%.

HCA insiders were selling off shares as early as January 2005, with the largest sales taking place in April, May and June of that year. The insider sell-off totaled about 2.3 million shares worth at least $112 million.

Frist had held HCA stock in a blind trust with approval of the Senate Ethics Committee and contended that he had no idea of its value or that of any of his stock holdings. Documents filed with the Senate showed that Frist was often updated by trustees about changes to his trusts, including the addition and sale of HCA stock. He also had HCA shares in other trusts.


http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2007-04-27-frist-stock_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. The well is poisoned. What do we know of the US Atty?
Michael J. Garcia is the current United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

Is he a loyal Bushie? How did he avoid "the list"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bingo. Garcia keeps his job. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. and *that* is a big problem with the purge.... every decision by those
employed by the DOJ per which suits to pursue and which to drop - are suspect - rightly or not. They just are. I don't think a lot of folks who don't follow the news realize how serious this scandal really is.

Running justice as a political arm of the White House has serious repercussions - political prosecutions and nonprosecutions. And leaving all actions suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. And that's why
the bigger question always has been what did the U.S. attorneys that kept their jobs do. I wonder how many 'successful' prosecutions will now be back in the courts screaming political persecution. Everything in the system has become tainted because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bingo!
I think the stories that will flow from this will continue to come forth and multiply - until it is too "in the face" for much of the public to ignore and not understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I googled a little bit last night
He was with Homeland Security in 2003, and appointed to this spot in 2005.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/nominations/530.html

http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/garciam-bio.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Appointed in 2005?
An 18-month investigation by the SEC staff and the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York ended without action against the Tennessee Republican, the Post reported.


18 months ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. OK...since this administration has made US attorney jobs POLITICAL,
what are the POLITICS of the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York???

This is just SHOCKING!!! I cannot believe this has happened! I trusted the people doing this investigation to do the right thing!:eyes::sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. How different is this than what Martha Stewart
spent time in jail for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I believe
Martha was never charged with insider trading - she was, rather, charged with lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. AFAIK Martha was never Senate Majority Leader.
I have much higher expectations of a Senate Majority Leader than I do of a lifestyle maven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Totally agreed ...
I was trying to understand why Frist would get a pass and Stewart would go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC