zaj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 03:09 AM
Original message |
Patrick Kennedy Retiring to Move to MA and run against Brown for Teddy's Seat? |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 03:09 AM by zaj
Interesting that his retirement announcement follows a few days after these aggressive comments. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/79863-patrick-kennedy-scott-browns-candidacy-a-jokePatrick Kennedy: Scott Brown's candidacy 'a joke' By Michael O'Brien and Jordy Yager - 02/04/10 05:07 PM ET Sen. Scott Brown's (R-Mass.) election has been shown to be "a joke," the son of the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) said Thursday.
Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) castigated Brown for having pushed to be sworn in ahead of schedule to permanently fill the Senate seat left vacant by the congressman's father's death in August.
"Brown's whole candidacy was shown to be a joke today when he was sworn in early in order to cast his first vote as an objection to Obama's appointment to the NLRB," Kennedy said Thursday.
Kennedy was referencing some Democrats' thoughts that Brown tried to bump up his swearing-in in order to give Republicans 41 votes, enough to filibuster the nomination of Craig Becker, a controversial nominee to join the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
"Seven out of ten of Brown's voters were labor households and he stressed that he was independent and while he was originally scheduled to be sworn in next week, they moved it up to today so he could cast his first vote, the most anti-labor, the most anti-what his constituents thought they were voting for when they voted for him," Kennedy said.
Brown, for his part, has denied trying to move up his nomination to block Becker's nomination.
"This is where he shows that when they need him, he's in the tank for the Republicans," Kennedy said.
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 03:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I hope he takes Teddy seat |
|
we need a Kennedy back in it.
|
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 03:31 AM
Response to Original message |
2. He'll have to wait 2 years though, won't he? |
diva77
(999 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. maybe while he's waiting he can investigate the legitimacy of Brown's "election" |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 03:43 AM by diva77
:hi:
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. If he's like his dad, he'll spend those two years scouring MA to |
|
meet the people, learn about their concerns, i.e., campaign. That's what was missing with Coakley, among other things.
|
w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 03:42 AM
Response to Original message |
3. He sounds like he has a good political intuition. I hope he runs! Brown's days are numbered. (nt) |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 03:42 AM by w4rma
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I hope he doesn't. He has none of the political skills or grace of his father |
|
He's way down in the polls in RI. He has a history that can be exploited with ease by Brown.
|
w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Oh well. First impressions and all that. (nt) |
Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. we'll see. I think that 1st vote of Brown's will certainly help whoever runs against him. |
|
wonder if he's sold off his grown daughters yet? they are 'available' as he said in his acceptance speech! :puke:
|
crazyjoe
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 05:53 AM
Response to Original message |
8. no way, what if he loses to brown? |
Cid_B
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 06:24 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Didn't the vote end up.. |
|
being mid 40s against and mid 50s for? So they didn't need Brown's vote either way...
Correct me if I'm wrong, read a snippet about it a few days ago and thats what I remember.
|
iceman66
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. They didn't need Brown's vote in the end |
|
because the turncoat "Democrats" Nelson and Lincoln decided to support the fillibuster.
Without them, and Brown, there wouldn't have been enough to fillibuster and the nomination would have been approved.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |