Hume & O'Reilly-coverage of Tea Baggers not as nice as Anti-War crowd

[underpants]

O'REILLY: But just the fact that these people walk the walk, they don't get any respect. And Sammon was highlighting that.

HUME: Well, I think also, Bill, it's fair to make a comparison between the kind of coverage let's say the big anti-war demonstrations that went on during the last part of the — last parts of the Bush administration, the kind of coverage they got. They there would be a parade of extremists up on the platform saying the most remarkable things and the coverage in a lot of mainstream media outlets would be focused on the nice couples and the little families that are down in the crowd and their kind of civic.

O'REILLY: That's a great analogy. It's a great..

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,585263,00.html

WHAT COVERAGE OF THE ANTI-WAR DEMONSTRATORS??? :shrug::eyes:

[hankthecrank]

1. when pulling things out of thin air who needs facts

These two wouldn't know truth

making things up is all they do

[SpiralHawk]

2. Hume and O'Loofah are a cutesy-poo couple right out of 1984's Ministry of Truthiness

Disgusting -- the obscene wide-stance, diaper-clad republicon sexual acts they perform upon reality.

The Humester and O'Loofah have hooked up to make Republicon Valentine's POOpaganda together.

How loathesome.

[47of74]

3. Should put a sign like this up near Bill-O's studio

Hell, put a dozen like this up.

[louis-t]

7. Hmmm, from my limited Euro language skills, I'd say

Shit face?

[47of74]

8. Yep.

[heli]

4. Hume & O'Reilly should get a room for Valentine's Day

[47of74]

5. Oh Christ

[OHdem10]

6. What coverage of the Anti-War Protests???? No coverage =no criticism.

Any honest observer must admit the Anti-War Demonstrations
were not that offensive.