Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow Stuns Rep. Aaron Schock By Calling Out His Spending Hypocrisy (VIDEO)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:01 PM
Original message
Rachel Maddow Stuns Rep. Aaron Schock By Calling Out His Spending Hypocrisy (VIDEO)
A heated exchange took place during NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday when MSNBC host Rachel Maddow accused Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) of hypocrisy for railing against a spending bill in public while touting its benefits in his home district.

Appearing alongside each other during a panel session, Maddow pivoted from a discussion on job creation to note that Schock had appeared at an event on Friday touting a grant program that he had voted against.


"You, in your district, I just read that you were at a community college touting a $350,000 green technology education program, talking about how great that was going to be for your district," she said. "You voted against the bill that created that grant. That's happening a lot with Republicans sort of taking credit for things that Democratic bills do and then Republicans simultaneously touting their votes against them and trashing them. That, I think, is a problem that needs to be resolved within your caucus. Because you seem like a very nice person but that is a very hypocritical stance to take."


A somewhat taken-aback Schock insisted that Republicans were "not consulted on the stimulus bill" and shouldn't be blamed for the lack of a bipartisan vote for its passage. This didn't really get to Maddow's point. So after some back-and-forth among the other panelists, Schock jumped back in.

"I think the argument that liberals are making is absolutely ridiculous," he said. "With all due respect, Rachel, does that mean you are going to give back your Bush tax cuts that you continue to rail against. The fact of the matter is our country operates and is governed by a majority. And I, along with almost all my Republican colleagues and a good number of Democrats, have voted against the stimulus, the omnibus and all this runaway spending. But we lost those battles in the House... At the end of the day my constituents and their children and grandchildren will be on the hook for the deficit being created by this majority and they deserve to their fair share of federal spending."

Regarding Schock's appearance at the green technology education program ribbon-cutting ceremony, the bill providing funds for that program was an omnibus-spending bill that Congress took up last spring. Maddow's point, nevertheless, remained the same.

"If you vote against the omnibus bill," she said at the end of the exchange, "if you complain about the omnibus bill, if you tout your vote against the omnibus bill, it is hypocrisy to then go to your district and go to a ribbon cutting ceremony for something that is funded by the omnibus bill that you voted against."

Watch the exchange at 2:20:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/14/rachel-maddow-stuns-rep-a_n_461885.html Video is 16:26 long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rachel does not back down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Right! And she does it all with dignity and class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rachel devoured that little jackass
Edited on Sun Feb-14-10 01:08 PM by malaise
It was beautiful to watch. I'll be watching on TV again at 2.00pm on GEM$NBC just for the laugh. Rachel prepares her work like a first rate academic. Go Rachel - those punks are not in your league.
Rachel Maddow -PhD., Oxford, Rhodes Scholar and all that. :yourock: :D

change word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. hope Gregory takes some pointers from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. She did great
She also hammered on the meme that there were no Republican ideas in the HCR bill. She enumerated some of the Republicans' wish list items for HCR and pointed out that they are all in the Senate bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. sorry, i can't get past gregory and brooks....i threw up twice trying to watch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah, Gregory makes me sick. I still look at him and picture him boogying with KKKarl Rove...
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Dances with rove sucks bigtime if you ask me
and that one act was an example of why that is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now, *that's* what I'm talking about! Go, Rachel!!!!!
I just love her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R #14 for, replace GREGORY with MADDOW. But I'll quibble that the wingnut didn't look "taken aback
Edited on Sun Feb-14-10 01:36 PM by UTUSN
," and I wish Rachel and Dems would leave out the qualifiers, the parts about, "You seem like you're a nice person..." when they deliver the zingers we are STARVED for. Like today BIDEN said he was sure CHEENEE is a very nice dude, too.


Oh, this is the longest I have seen of GREGORY since he took over MTP. I stopped watching MTP a year or two before G.E.RUSSERT croaked. And this time, I made it all the way to Harold FORD, Jr, where I instantly tuned OUT!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Couldn't agree with you more! Cheney is not and never was "a nice fellow."
why do they have to sugarcoat it?
He's such a craven POS. And you'd never hear Cheney saying that any Democrat was "a nice fellow,"
that's for sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. No, no...
CLONE Rachel so one can be on TV and in the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. I love when she's on
She's always polite and civil, but she always has her facts in order and calls them on their B.S.

Anyone know the ratings trend when she appears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Schrock is full of schrock. He's against a bill but still wants credit for the pork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'd prefer to have seen her just kick him in the nuts, but this is OK, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Politicians aren't used to being challenged on their bullshit.
ESPECIALLY repubelickins'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. k & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Did you give back your Bush tax cuts?" TRY AGAIN, JUNIOR!!
Weakest fucking analogy in the world!!! :rofl: :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Rachel never VOTED for Bush's tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. I wish she would run for the House or Senate
Edited on Sun Feb-14-10 11:33 PM by Samantha
I wish someone would call and ask her as they did Ed Schultz. I would love to see her run and win (for anything, really). I would love to see a little of that action down on Capitol Hill, confrontation in real time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. She is much more valuable where she is. Our most important tactic is to inform
the public of the hypocrisy of the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. Excellent, thank you, Rachel. And even Ford made himself somewhat useful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC