Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bank threatens foreclosure; Man bulldozes home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:29 AM
Original message
Bank threatens foreclosure; Man bulldozes home
Wow, this is an intriguing news clip.

Man who was threatened with foreclosure on his $350,000 home, says
'screw you' and bulldozes his home before it's taken over.

http://www.kcci.com/video/22610728/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Vive la revolution
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. The revolution of the rich who owe taxes and aren't going to take it anymore?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, this came out yesterday. It's on this board somewhere.
I thought it was great!!:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fabulous. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. I assume he still owes 350,000 and now has no house to pay toward it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He actually had quite a bit of equity in it. Total dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. He had a TON of equity and he didn't think he should pay taxes...
Another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. A total dumb ass hot head -
but at least he didn't drive his bull dozer through a federal office building.

but give him time...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. If the house secured the loan....
...and it is a no recourse state, he is off the hook on the loan.

HOWEVER, destroying the security is another issue and most likely is criminal conduct.

But...what jury is gonna side with the fucking bank? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Considering the IRS was seizing his assets...
Tax court is where he will face his reckoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Maybe federal criminal charges on the destruction of the property...
...but tax court merely sets the amounts of the obligations, penalties, etc., it has nothing to do with the destruction of property which appears to be done to frustrate a colletion action.

And...if the IRS was at the colletion stage, IMO, they have a sum certain either through a prior tax court proceeding or the default of the tax payer to timely file for the same.

Thus, IMO, it is too late for tax court and, futher, the destruction of property to frustrate a creditor is not a tax court matter.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. If they find you are trying to hide or eliminating your assets, it is a crime. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. He had never missed a payment but the bank foreclosed because of an IRS lien
That's messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, you have to pay your taxes. Life sucks that way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Then maybe I am confused
Is the foreclosure part of the IRS lien? The story gave the impression it wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. More likely he couldn't pay his IRS lien so he stopped paying his mortgage....
You're right that it is not written well though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. No - he was paying his mortgage. He just wouldn't pay his taxes
so the IRS went after his assets.

Given that the taxes were related to his business and given that the IRS was being very aggressive I would guess it was not his personal income taxes they were after but monies he withheld from his employees for state and federal withholding, medicare and social security but did not deposit with the feds.

I hope he goes to prison for a long time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. At some point his mortgage wasn't being paid possibly due to wage garnishments...
Looks like his business is also being closed too. You're right about prison of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. In the clip I watched he said he never missed a mortgage payment.
But that is not the issue I don't believe. The IRS was going after his main asset because they wanted money. The IRS will work with people who owe personal income taxes but they will not mess around if he kept money belonging to his employees.

As I understand it, if an employer withholds monies from their employees and don't deposit it the employee is still liable for the missing funds. Example - Your employer reports on your W2 that you earned $40,000 in 2009 and he withheld $3,500 for your federal taxes. You assume he deposited it with the government. Then you file your 2009 taxes using that $3,500 that you believe to be on deposit with the IRS. But it turns out your employer lied because he took your money but didn't give it to the feds. You (the employee) are still liable for all your taxes and if the $3,500 is not on deposit you have to come up with the money. Note: This happened to a friend of mine who worked for an engineering firm. She had to take a second job to pay her taxes - taxes she thought she had already paid once but her employer took the money and kept it.

Keeping and not depositing employee money will cause the IRS to go crazy and use every means possible to get the employee's money back. Its a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. True enough..
That's a really good rundown of a likely scenario with the IRS. I'm thinking he was probably paying people under the table and his brother turned him in. The IRS doesn't like that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. So maybe he CLAIMED he had never missed a payment
That seems likely. Reporters are more and more likely these days to just tell one side of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good link here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good on him!
Nice to see someone stand up to the fucking criminal cabal known as banksters.

May they all rot and burn in Hell for all eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, tax cheats unite. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. That's right...
.. vilify the victims of the rigged game.

Anything for profit, right pal? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. A fatcat fighting the IRS is the victim?
Edited on Sat Feb-20-10 12:21 PM by WriteDown
You must love Mr. Stack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Let me know when ..
... the assholes that just rewards themselves with 100s of billions of OUR atx dollars in "bonuses" are in handcuffs and we'll chat about "fatcats."

Some folks will fall for anything.

Oh lookie... it's shiny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. So you can't have smaller fatcats?
The guy was a tax cheat just like Stack. He's losing his business and his home, rightfully so. He had what was HIS and he wasn't going to share anything with the IRS Do you minimize a man who kills his wife because there's still a serial killer on the loose? Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I refuse to...
... argue with people who defend a rigged, unfair, deck is stacked against you, system. Welcome to ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yes, the IRS needs to be shut down. A libertarian paradise awaits. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Consider that MILLIONS os us are long term unemployed, and
instead of starving, have used the funds, without that convenient feature of witholding some. How will all of us pay? Prison? I am disabled, and the Gov wont allow any to gain SS dis, until half dead. And even then. So, we go along, hoping to die, right before they come to do us in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. Sounds like a teabagger Rethug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. No, teabagger Rethugs try to KILL people in their flameout. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Dupe.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC