Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican men get a taste of their own medicine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:15 PM
Original message
Republican men get a taste of their own medicine
If your Legislature experiences sanity for more than four hours, consult your doctor

Unfortunately, Kansans have never had to consult their doctors about prolonged exposure to a sane Republican Legislature.

But there was a glimpse of sanity yesterday, when Republican men - who seem to like to tell women what to do with their bodies - got a taste of their own medicine.

During a debate on a bill dealing with insurance regulations, Rep. Pete DeGraaf (R-Mulvane) got an amendment added that would require women to buy separate insurance policies that covered abortions. It passed 73-45.

Assuming what's good for the goose is good for the gander, Rep. Ann Mah (D-Topeka) proposed an amendment that would require men to buy separate insurance policies that covered erectile dysfunction drugs. She pointed out that many insurance plans don't cover birth control, and asked why it was then fair to have women pay “the cost of Viagra for all the old guys who want to have sex?”

more . . . http://www.domeontherange.org/2010/02/if-your-legislature-experiences-sanity.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now that's a bill I could get behind!!!
So glad she did that!

:kick: & R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
58. "I ONLY USE THAT VIAGRA SHIT SO I DONT ROLL OUT OF BED"....John McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. so that "rape is the same as auto theft" bill passed, or is this a different piece of insanity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Don't know what you are referring to.
But I gather this is a different piece of insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. just this week, forget where, exactly, a similar bill being discussed, and some idiot wanted to
include a provision that in order for an abortion in case of rape to be covered, it had to be reported to the police. the idiot legislator said something along the lines of "it's no different from having to report an auto theft"

someone here can provide the links--I don't think I bookmarked those threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes. It happened in Kansas. I looked it up.
We have some major doofus reps here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Steve Brunk, a Bel Aire Republican
The bill would require a police report to be filed if the woman wants an abortion to be covered by her insurance under the incest or rape exemptions.

But groups that work with domestic violence victims worried that some victims may not want to report a rape or incest.

“Rape is a deeply traumatic event,” said Sandy Barnett, director of the Kansas Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence. “Often (victims) are afraid of law enforcement and the criminal justice system itself.”

Lawmakers said that they sympathized, but that women should have to report they were raped if they want the abortion covered by insurance.

“You’d have to have a report that someone stole your car,” said Rep. Steve Brunk, a Bel Aire Republican. “This is kind of the same thing.”


http://www.kansascity.com/2010/02/11/1742900/kansas-bill-would-bar-insurance.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Let him know just how much you agree that Rape = Car being stolen:

Capitol Office
Room: 166-W
Phone: 785-296-7645
Email: steve.brunk@house.ks.gov


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
47. I just did...
I don't care whether it's an answering machine or not. I say we bomb the answering machine with phone calls.

What a dope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
26.  Republican = insensitive idiots.
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Awesome job Rep. Mah!
Go to her website www.annmah.org to read more good stuff about her. K&R!

And this "women should buy separate abortion insurance policies" thing is not surprising. Bart Stupak successfully got that kind of amendment passed by the US House.

Bottom line? Never propose legislation telling people what to do with themselves if it does not cause someone else to bleed, break a bone, lose breath, or get severely stressed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. The men will Mount a Stiff opposition to her amendment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Might help with the ED you think..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope this thing takes off.
K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brewens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've always thought it interesting that as much as so-called conservatives hate science,
they don't hate medical science when it allows them to have babies or have sex when they get old.
No chance an infertile couple will be advised that it is gods will that they not have children. Pull out all the stops and do whatever you have to at whatever expense to get pregnant.
Getting too old the get good wood? Not a problem, medical science will fix you up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Brilliant! Why didn't anyone think of this earlier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ha! Her ammendment passed
It's not the 1950's any more - not even in Kansas - lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. so they'll have to vote against the whole thing
The good ole boys will never let that stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. ...of course not
And I'll bet they won't learn a lesson from this episode either - lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. Excellent! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
42. really???? FANTASTIC!!
A great idea is only as good as the legs it gets!


YES!!! to the reality based world! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. I love Ann.
She is awesome.

I bought a scarf and matching gloves that she knitted and donated to the Topeka Aids Project auction. She is wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. Can we throw in mandatory prostate exams?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Only if they are televised. The public has a right to know.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. and now, in Breaking News.....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. Republican and Sanity are polar opposite words.
That's like saying Good Fascist, or anything containing the name "Yoo" with the word Legal.

Great catch though, Another great American hypocrisy laid at the feet of Re-Pukes

A Separate insurance policy for abortions = Separate insurance policy for Viagra

Love it. Wonder how many Freeper Heads exploded when they read that one. :bounce: :toast:

K&R
Mind if I re-post this on our local Freep Site ?
There are a few heads there that haven't exploded in some time, This should do it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Yes of course you can repost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. Thanks, I will :)
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caretha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
56. Only if you report back on the amount of brain matter spewed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. I didn't think any insurance policies cover ED drugs anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Yes some companies do.
That is another reason for them to control the vote. White old men love viagra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Oh yes, they do. It's Gawd's Will if a woman gets preggers, but Not Gawd's Will to be impotent!
It makes me want to cuss out loud, so it does.

:wtf: :argh: :dunce: :hurts: :wow: :grr: :nuke: :thumbsdown: :banghead: :rant: :sarcasm:

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
46. Some will
if you have a documented circulatory problem (diabetes, heart disease, etc) and are medically cleared for sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. The stupid thing is, if men didn't try to control women like this we would not have to penalize men
too.
Both issues should be covered by insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric Condon Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. I agree with the idea behind this (i.e. separate insurance shouldn't be required to cover abortion)
But I'm always troubled by the attitude about things like this on this site, which basically boils down to "ED drugs only benefit old white guys, and then their put-upon wives suffer when suddenly they have to go through the burden of having sex again." It just reinforces the whole women-as-sexual-gatekeeper stereotype, as well as the idea that men are horndogs and that women would so much rather be doing anything other than having sex.

Did it never occur to anyone that maybe these drugs sometimes benefit couples who have healthy, balanced relationships, and who might actually desire intimacy in their lives in a mutually fulfilling way? Why does any mention of ED drugs immediate conjure images of some rich wrinkly old white guy pestering his trophy wife for sex she doesn't want to have?

It's just another stupid patriarchal assumption that hurts both sexes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. I fully agree. The premise here is that only men benefit from ED drugs
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 02:52 PM by Nye Bevan
and almost everyone posting in this thread agrees with this premise. I get the impression that most of the female DUers posting here do not enjoy sex, and would be happy if their partner suffered from ED and could not obtain drugs for it. If I were ever to get ED, my wife would be just as eager as I would be (if not more so) for me to obtain the appropriate treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hahahaha, glorious stick to them rub their nose in it till they know what the f they are doing.
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 12:09 PM by ProgressOnTheMove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. It's a valid parallel
... that ought to be made part of the discussion more often. Call it Sexual / Reproductive Health Issues. If women can "plan" for an unplanned pregnancy, men can certainly plan for sex / vasectomies, etc.

Hate to paint with a broad brush, but Kansas disappoints again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. don't worry guys...it's only a taste with no bite
men outnumber women in congress and so they can ALWAYS vote down a woman's bill. Note it was only proposed, not passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. Love it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. Sweet! Thank you, Rep. Mah!
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 02:45 PM by blondeatlast
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. Great Stuff....Go Representative Mah!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. Love it!
Rep. Ann Mah (D-Topeka) is my new hero! :loveya: Rep. Ann Mah.

:bounce: :woohoo: :bounce: :fistbump:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. Boom goes the dynamite - Way to go Rep.Mah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
44. Good idea....
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 03:52 PM by winyanstaz
and why not an additional "recreational tax" or a "sin tax" on all users of viagra too? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sledgehammer Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. And Bob Dole checks into hospital...seriously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
48. Great Law!
The policy should be as proportionally expensive as the drugs are they have to buy them without insurance. Big bucks for those drugs should result in big bucks for their coverage. And of course. No preexisting conditions.:evilgrin: First time limpers only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzNick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
51. Exercise lightly (meaning: walk!), eat and live healthy: you won't need Viagra!
A little bit of exercise and physical activity, a healthy diet, little or no alcohol, no tobacco: you will not need this thing until you die.

I would bet most of the Viagra users are Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
52. Brava, Rep. Mah!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. I LOVE this gal!
And I do use those little blue pills! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #53
61. Then don't call her a gal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I love this female specimen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Couldn't manage "woman" or "Congressperson" or "Rep," huh? Had to put her in her place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Here's the thing
I was initially expressing my elation with this fine WOMAN'S actions. There was no malice or minorizing or diminishment implied or intended in my choice of descriptor. I'm 65 this month - volunteered to go push back the red tide years ago - believe in the progressive way of thinking and am patriotic, even while my country pursues ends that embarrass me as a citizen. I feel "brash" enough to use "Gal" and not feel I have to apologize. Further, I'd bet a buck to a cops donut that this woman congressional representative would NOT chastize me if I said to her face that I thought she was one stand-up gal.

There's your apology. We can gift wrap that if you like! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. wow, you sure are offended!
The movement for equal rights has now been reduced to PC idiocy. Congratulations: you have become a parody of yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
54. Good for Rep. Mah!!!
That'll teach them.......

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guilded Lilly Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
55. Damn Straight. No pun intended. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
57. Lol.
That's really great ! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
59. what's good for the goose is good for the gander - PERFECT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
60. Not invasive enough for the clueless to get the concept. Needs to be internal
Closest would be coverage of prostate health and treatment. Pay separate for their in vitro procedures. Any procreative procedures, separate process, different coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
63. In Australia men have to pay full price for viagra
and womens birth control is covered but you pay a co payment for it like most drugs.

My best friend lives near Sydney and we have talks all the time about her health care. Abortions are fully covered too and thats in the free health care.

They have been trying though for years to get it privatized and selling policies that at first offered tons of massage and stuff extra like that. She said now that people are on it they are pulling back on what they give. The reason most people change over and pay is to pick their own doctor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
66. Did it pass?
Or was it just more political theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kyril Enko Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
70. HA!
Always a good idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC