Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tenet vs. Rumsfeld: "The Yesman and the thug." review of James Risen's book, State of War.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 08:19 PM
Original message
Tenet vs. Rumsfeld: "The Yesman and the thug." review of James Risen's book, State of War.
Edited on Sun Apr-29-07 08:22 PM by Gabi Hayes
I hope the release of that cowardly asskisser's new book will spark interest in the fantastic book James Risen, who blew the lid off MANY scandals regarding the misuse of intelligence, willful misinterpretation thereof, renditioning/torture/murder of prisoners, GROSS incompetence (if not outright criminal malfeasance), and much, much more

here's the Salon review of Risen's book, which I casn't recommend more highl:

The yes man and the thug

In his disturbing new book, Times reporter James Risen reveals how George Tenet's gutless surrender to war-obsessed Donald Rumsfeld led to the total breakdown of U.S. intelligence.

http://www.salon.com/books/review/2006/01/10/risen/

Jan. 10, 2006 | Marketing copy is always suspect, so when journalist James Risen's new book "State of War" arrived accompanied by a press release containing the phrase "tip of the iceberg," I began to worry. "Tip of the iceberg" is a lemonade-from-lemons construction, an attempt by the publisher to allay concerns that the book's biggest scoops have already been widely aired. After all, several weeks ago the New York Times, where Risen covers national security issues, published much of what you'll read in the book's second chapter, which reveals that President Bush authorized a program to eavesdrop on Americans without warrants. Since then, Bush has acknowledged the existence of the wiretapping plan, and Risen and Times colleague Eric Lichtblau have uncovered a great deal more about the program that goes beyond what's in "State of War," including the fact that federal judges and senior members of Bush's own Justice Department have balked at it. After all this new news, it's natural to wonder whether "State of War," which made it to stores just last week, might already be stale on the shelf, a blockbuster-to-be that's now just bust.

Yet it turns out that far from an empty bit of P.R. puffery, "tip of the iceberg" may be the perfect phrase to describe Risen's compelling, disturbing, if ultimately somewhat unfulfilling, volume. In sketching the recent history of the American intelligence apparatus, Risen serves up scooplet after astonishing scooplet of our spy agencies' mistakes and misdeeds. There's much more here than illegal wiretapping; indeed, the wiretapping story is even a bit out of place in "State of War," a one-off chapter on the National Security Agency in a volume mostly about the CIA. (The book's subtitle is "The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration.")

Most of Risen's bombshell disclosures have to do with that agency, including new details on the CIA's interrogation practices and its stable of secret prisons. In addition, we learn that in the months before the United States invaded Iraq, the CIA obtained and then ignored specific intelligence pointing to the absence of weapons of mass destruction under Saddam Hussein, and that, as the famous Downing Street memo noted, the CIA was essentially fixing data around what it knew to be an inevitable war. In what may be the book's most sensational claim, Risen writes that as part of a bizarre, almost unbelievably ill-conceived attempt to disrupt the Iranian nuclear program, the agency recently provided the Iranian government with highly sensitive technical designs for making part of a nuclear bomb -- and then lost track of what the Iranians did with the blueprints.



........


To the extent that Risen does put forward a theory for why U.S. intelligence has failed so frequently and so spectacularly under George W. Bush, the story focuses on two key players. The first is George Tenet, the former CIA director, whom Risen paints as a feckless yes man, a pusillanimous glad-hander who ruined the agency's credibility and integrity because he could never stand up to others in the administration. "George Tenet liked to talk about how he was a tough Greek from Queens, but in reality, he was a pussy," one former CIA insider tells Risen. "He just wanted people to like him."


this snip doesn't even cover what I consider to be by FAR the most important outcome of this criminal regime: the almost complete co-opting of intel by Rumsfeld, in his desire to control ALL intelligence gathering AND operations under his DOD aegis.

second most interesting was how Condi and Powell both were portrayed as unimportant, little regarded players. Risen quotes unnamed sources (I know), who say Condi was the WORST, most ineffective National Security Advisor ever, and that Rumsfeld treated her with contemptful disdain

this review is well worth reading for the light it shines on the nature of Tenet's lack of character, during which he's portrayed as the epitome of the gladhanding suck uppy careerist, interested more in his own personal advancement than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. good. glad to see I wasted my time again. BTW, Risen is the NYT writer
whose story on illegal wiretapping went unpublished. you know, the one they sat on from BEFORE the 04 elections, and mostly served to get him and his partner, as well as the NYT, accused of treason for revealing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds fabulous
I'm currently reading Nemesis by Chalmers Johnson. The Risen book sounds like a great companion to the Johnson, which is excellent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Donna! check your PMs
where have you been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Great to see your name here, Donna!
This thread is like Tabletalk Old Home Week, I guess. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. very elite, yes?
our own little sandbox

where's publius redux?

ever go there anymore?

I almost never do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's nice to know James Risen's work is improving since his days of framing Wen Ho Lee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. whoaaa. that was him?
that doesn't sound so good.

do I have to read it?

was Jeff Gerth involved in that one, too, or did he shoot his little pod on Whitewater?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I see it was Jeff Gerth. I wonder what the inside scoop on that would be.
Eric Boehlert reporting, he of the very very impressive Lapdogs, about the media's love affair for the BFEE, particularly Mark Halperin and The Note

thanks for the headsup

too bad about Risen being involved with that skunk, Gerth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wrap your head around this little nugget of knowledge
"In what may be the book's most sensational claim, Risen writes that as part of a bizarre, almost unbelievably ill-conceived attempt to disrupt the Iranian nuclear program, the . . .CIA . . . recently provided the Iranian government with highly sensitive technical designs for making part of a nuclear bomb -- and then lost track of what the Iranians did with the blueprints."

What is WRONG with these people?? This administration is an open-air lunatic asylum. :banghead::wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC