Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NM job seekers don't have to disclose crime record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:30 PM
Original message
NM job seekers don't have to disclose crime record
NM job seekers don't have to disclose crime record


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — New Mexico became the second state to "ban the box" with Gov. Bill Richardson's signature on a law prohibiting employment applications for government agencies from asking job seekers if they'd been convicted of a crime.

The measure was signed Monday and covers job applications for state, county or local government but not private business.

The legislation doesn't prohibit employers from asking the question once they're face-to-face with applicants and doesn't stop them from doing background checks.

It passed the New Mexico Senate 35-4 and the House 54-14

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hNzm95GwidZYbQ1KbXQKYU-GUfsAD9EB98E80
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. So if you don't check the box and you don't sign consent form
does that mean employers can still do background checks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not sure, but they can sure as heck not hire you.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 04:43 PM by MineralMan
Haven't seen any forced hiring laws yet. "Sorry, but we selected another applicant," I think the boilerplate line goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks for your reply. I was being devil's advocate.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's good news.
It makes little sense to hold a criminal record against someone for the rest of their life. It's sort of a one mistake and you're finished scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC