Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Consumer Reports: Toyota investigation reveals more details in San Diego Prius case (faked runaway!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:22 PM
Original message
Consumer Reports: Toyota investigation reveals more details in San Diego Prius case (faked runaway!)

In fairness to the stories about Toyota I have posted, I'm posting this that confirms it didn't happen the way the driver said it did.

http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2010/03/toyota-investigation-reveals-more-details-in-san-diego-sikes-prius-case.html

March 17, 2010

This week, Toyota and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released preliminary findings into the reported case of unintended acceleration in the San Diego area, involving a 2008 Prius. Both organizations independently stated that they were unable to duplicate the conditions described by the driver, nor find evidence that the vehicle could not stop. (Read: "Toyota shares finding in runaway Prius investigation" and "NHTSA can’t duplicate runaway Prius report, investigation continues.")

At the Toyota press conference Monday, officials explained that its investigators established that the driver had stepped on the brake pedal at least 250 times while the engine was revving above idle speed. That's significant because one hard application of the brakes should have stopped that car, while 250 light presses would have only worn out the brakes--as was documented.

Toyota representatives recounted how they were unable to replicate the sequence of events reported by James Sikes, who had claimed that his 2008 Prius sped out of control for more than 20 minutes on a California interstate highway on March 8th. Toyota officials and technicians had examined the suspect Prius at an El Cajon, California, dealership, where they repaired its worn front brakes and then tried to reproduce a condition where the brakes would not stop the car. They couldn't.

The fact that Toyota couldn't replicate a sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) event is not surprising. SUAs tend to be rare, unpredictable events. But Toyota's preliminary findings about the condition of this car after the event throw doubt on the driver's report.

The braking story
Unlike many Toyotas, the Prius is equipped with a form of brake override that reduces engine power when the brakes are applied hard, no matter what is happening with the gas pedal. That system is not designed to be a brake override as such, a Toyota spokesman told us, but rather to serve as a fail-safe to prevent damage to the hybrid system.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sailor65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I feel like the baby in the ETrade commercial.....
Let me show you my "Shocked" face.....

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. funny--toyota never responds to the fact that the brakes were burned out
as the other investigative agency found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think you understand; this *WAS* a direct response to that.
The reason the brakes were burned out was that they were
lightly applied for a very long time. Had they been firmly
applied, the car would have stopped.

Just as a quick data point: 50 HP dissipated in the brakes
represents about 37,000 watts of heat. By comparison,
a typical electric stove, with all elements and its oven
running, only dissipates about 10,000 watts. At those
sorts of power levels, a car can very quickly toast its
brakes if that's your intention.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. unless a computer glitch was causing it to happen
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 05:42 PM by librechik
Then he might have been "standing on the brake" as reported, yet the computer system would not allow that pressure to apply to the actual braking system.

Until Toyota agrees to look into the computer problems, few will trust their conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Of course.
It was a simultaneous malfunction of the braking logic,
the transmission logic, and the throttle management logic
but the engine management computer simultaneously
stayed sane enough to keep operating the timed fuel
injection and the timed ignition system.

Or the guy was faking it.

I'm pretty sure I know which of these two scenarios *I*
think is more likely.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. but but but,,,,the Prius isn't your standard car...
it's got 'puters and stuff running everything with trillions of lines of code and like, anything can happen right?

Sometimes my browser locks up and freezes and when that happens my Outlook gets really slow so see..it could happen!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. The funny part is that it is vaguely possible that the realtime threads...
...that run the fuel injection and the spark *COULD* stay
alive while some lower priority threads got blocked, but
even if we put-aside the idea that braking control is probably
a pretty-high-priority thread, there's the little matter of
watchdog timers.

If the main control loop ain't executing fully, the odds are
very high that one or more watchdog timers aren't getting
reset either, and the entire system will be rebooted in the
next second or so.

But hey, as you said, among those trillions of lines of code
that are doubtless running the Prius, anything could happen,
right? ;-)

Tesha


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Consumer Reports running a pro-Toyota story?!
I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED I SAY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. So Toyota investigated and found they did nothing wrong
Ummmmm ok.

So the next criminal proceeding we really should let the defendant do their own investigation with the police and go with what they say. That seems to be ok here so let's start doing this with our criminal justice system as well.

Hey buddy you have been charged with four counts of murder.

Nope I investigated and found it wasn't me.

Well ok then you are free to go.

To be clear, I have no dog in this fight and honestly I'm not sure if the Prius owner's story is true or not. My point is when the hell did we let corporations start doing their own investigating and then go with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Trusting Toyota to investigate their blackboxes is like asking Diebold to investigate votingmachines
Consumer Reports needs investigated, they often act like Toyota's PR department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Who do you suggest investigate? More importantly, who pays? nt
Edited on Thu Mar-18-10 09:38 AM by NoGOPZone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Basically.
Your scenario is accurate. But you forgot the cozy connection factor.

Isn't it also well known that the NTSB has some cozy connections with auto companies (not just Toyota)?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Cogent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. The CHP has reported that the brake lights on the Toyota were flashing on and off..
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_bi_ge/us_runaway_prius_california_1

EL CAJON, California – A California Highway Patrol report released Wednesday said an officer saw brake lights flashing after arriving to help slow a speeding Toyota Prius on a Southern California freeway.

The account in the report is consistent with details the driver and CHP officer gave reporters shortly after the incident. Toyota, however, has cast doubt on the driver's story.

The report said the CHP officer trailed the Prius at 95 mph on Interstate 8 east of San Diego, and the car slowed to about 50 mph before the officer told driver Jim Sikes over a loudspeaker to hit the floor brake and emergency brake simultaneously.

Sikes gradually came to an unassisted stop and was not injured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yeap, even LIGHT pressing of the brake would'e slowed the car enough over a long stretch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC