Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Science briefing: Kindness and social forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 06:51 AM
Original message
Science briefing: Kindness and social forces
Source: Financial Times

Kindness down to social forces

Evolutionary biology alone cannot explain why people in modern societies are frequently kind and helpful to strangers, even though they derive no personal benefit and may even suffer for their altruism. A large study shows that, as communities grow larger, social forces such as religion and market systems become more important in controlling co-operative behaviour.

The research, published in the journal Science, looked at the behaviour of people in 15 societies, from New Guinea to North America, when playing three well-known economic games (called Ultimatum, Dictator and Third-Party Punishment).

According to the results, people in small, traditional societies that are not involved in world religions and do not have organised market systems are much less concerned with fairness than their counterparts who are part of the global economy and are influenced by religion. They are less likely to “play fair” in the games and also less likely to punish other players who cheat in the game.

“Our results contradict previous theories that humans learned to treat strangers fairly by transferring behaviour and norms developed in their actions and attitudes toward family and kin,” said Joe Henrich of the University of British Columbia, the study leader. “Small-scale communities have local norms governing all kinds of interactions, but they often don’t have default social norms of dealing with strangers or anonymous others in monetary transactions.”

Read more: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d382d65a-32dd-11df-bf5f-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
4saken Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...
Whoever wrote this article seems to be trying to inject their bias into the research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Social Justice"....everybody run for the hills as fast as you can
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Whilst being chased by a machete wielding crowd led by Glenn Beck
Social justice/religion + market forces = . Wow. Altruism on steroids!


Even more :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Is that altruism defined by Auswitz and the Crusades and the market forces by Lehman Brothers,
Shitty Bank and Skank of America? In that case, religion and market forces really do define altruism. For Attila the Hun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. don’t have default social norms of dealing with strangers or anonymous others...
Edited on Fri Mar-19-10 10:08 AM by AlbertCat
... in monetary transactions."

So.... they don't bail their failed banks out? (but they would if they were Christian! The heathens!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hmm.
A little suspect to determine motivation based on a game - how someone behaves in a situation that has no real-life consequences is often very different from how they would behave in reality.

Dr. Henrichs is a professor of psychology and economics - here's a link to the study concept:

Really long URL, so I used tinyurl to shorten:

http://tinyurl.com/yjof42a
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yjof42a


Personally, I see a few too many flaws in the protocol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC