Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suppose Congress Leaders Were Told Calif +4 Other States Would Default on Obligations this Monday?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:34 AM
Original message
Suppose Congress Leaders Were Told Calif +4 Other States Would Default on Obligations this Monday?
Would Congress go into secret session to address the crisis?

Would they rush through a 4 page bill to give Calif and the other states Bailouts in the Billions of $$ like they did Wall Street?

The timetable might be off, but the events are entirely possible.

I think Congress would balk and say 'you are on your own.'

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they do anything it should be on the order of a receivership.
And suspend all elected Republicans in the state until it is back in the red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Back in the black right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. How would CA default?
By choice? They control tax, they control spending. There is no way a city/state general obligation bonds defaults unless that entity say "fuck it" were not paying.

CA for example is offering a $5000 tax credit on the Nissan Leaf (on top of federal $7500 credit). While I find that laudable I find it less responsible when in a debt crisis. If CA or any state defaults it will be by choice. They SHOULD be told "you are on their own".

Of course we should have said the same thing to banks. Well actually I think bank bailout was necessary but it should simply be a liquidation and nationalization. If you owned bank stock it is worthless, bank bonds worthless, bank owes you a bonus or paycheck - worthless. Govt could have stepped in, saved bank (at 100% loss to all investors/owners) then turn around and reprivatized it after crisis passed at a profit. Sweden did this. Govt made a profit on saving banking system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. We are talking about the Senate here.
Republicans would say states should not be too big to fail, and allowing them to fail is just good capitalism. Even if the Congress could get something through, the Senate could not act in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. If those states can't meet their obligations
they could very well lose their status as a self-governing state and revert to being U.S. territories.

Bailing out a state is the ultimate in taxation without representation, when the citizens of the other 49 states have to foot the bill for it.

If I'm paying for California's sins I deserve a vote in their elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well is California "too big to fail"?
I don't think so.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC