Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there any movement in Congress to extend the $8000 home buyer tax credit?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:25 PM
Original message
Is there any movement in Congress to extend the $8000 home buyer tax credit?
Is anybody talking about extending it, or are they planning to just let it expire?

I am just asking, not taking a position on the issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Time for renters to get some kind of break. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Also check with your state.
Eons ago when I paid rent in Wisconsin, I got a state tax break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here is what I have heard:
NO plans to extend it - it appears that it WILL expire on April 30.

Short sales are being encouraged, govt. $$$ to be given to banks (and a little bit to homeowners vacating). This will be expensive, so I wouldn't count on any extension of the $8000 tax credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is a plan thats helps people who can get credit for a home.
I would say they are doing a good deal better than those living under a bridge. Just like cash for clunkers, it helped the auto cos and people doing well enough to buy a new car.

Neither plan did shit for those of us that needed help the most. I trying to see a difference between Obama and Bush but it is negligible. Both seem to favor industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Same with the Making Home Affordable program
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 01:43 PM by Cal Carpenter
I refinanced my mortgage a couple months ago to lower my rate. It was at 6.75% and I knew I could get it lower, and any closing costs would pay for themselves quickly.

I was not 'underwater', nor was I at risk of missing payments. I have equity. I am (thankfully) employed and living modestly, affordably. I just wanted to lower my payment by one or two hundred bucks if possible.

So I went through the whole process to get refinanced - worked with someone at a local bank who a friend referred me to. Had all my papers in order, got locked in at 4.25%. All was well.

Two days before closing, I was told in an offhand way that I was in the Making Home Affordable program. Didn't really think or worry about it, but later I looked it up and realized this is the program that is supposed to be saving people from foreclosure. I still don't know why I was enrolled, if it helped me get a better rate or what...I've looked all over the website for it and I still don't know.

But what it shows me is that people being 'helped' by these federal programs aren't the ones who need it the most. It's crumbs for the middle class. I'm sort of irritated that I count as a 'success' statistic for this program. Cash for clunkers is another example of this. Is it helping the single mom with three jobs get around faster so she can spend more time with her kids? No, she's still spending hours a day waiting for the bus just to pay the bills, and her credit's no good so no car dealer is going to give her a loan with or without a little federal check.

Whereas even the programs that are really 'supposed' to reach the neediest people don't work, in my experience. I'm associated with a nonprofit in my area that works with a lot of at-risk teens. Part of the stimulus was supposed to fund programs like this one to create paid internships for these type of kids. So this organization signed up to participate, and they were given about 2 weeks to line up the kids and get all the paperwork in order. Well, these are street kids, ya know? Real rough backgrounds. And these kids needed to have certified birth certificates or original social security cards in order to get into the program. Are you shitting me? Like these kids even have the $15 or whatever to pay for the copies of things, and to get bus fare to get to the office. These are kids who have no parents to speak of, no advocates. Well, the organization did it's best and managed to get 3 or 4 of the kids qualified in time, and ended up paying out of pocket for the other 10 or 15 kids because they didn't want to have to kick them out of the internship program. The feds won't reimburse the money to the organization because they didn't have the paperwork ready in time.

I know these are just anecdotes but I haven't heard anything to imply that my experience is an exception.

It's more rhetoric and crumbs than it is any sort of expanded opportunities for the people who really need it. These programs only sound good to people who don't need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was extended from Nov 30
I haven't heard anything else. I hope so because I think there are going to be a lot of people who will have to move for work and this would help a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nope but what would be nice
is if we could get banks to work with people and not foreclose on their homes.
Let people pay the mortgage on the WORTH of the home.

It's stories like this that show the banks are behaving stupidly.
"AFTER YOU made an offer to repurchase the house, which was rejected, and then forced to move out, the bank sold the house. How much did they end up selling the house for?

IN MARCH 2009, they sold it for $175,000--less than what we had offered to pay."

(Emphasis mine)
Source:http://socialistworker.org/2010/04/02/when-we-fight-we-win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC