|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:06 AM Original message |
Report: Insurers Shifting Costs to Avoid Healthcare Laws- NOW LET'S KILL THE MANDATE, add Medicare, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. That's An Idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Kill the punishing mandate ALONE, and leave the rest of the system - this ONLY hurts big crapsurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. This is precisely why an insurance mandate was a bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. And how is the mandate related to accounting practice changes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It's related to insurance companies, which is not health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. EXACTLY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. You do know that the mandate doesn't go into effect for 4 years and that almost all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Actually 2 years 8 months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. The profit motive is the raison detre of the for profit insurance industry. Hope this helps. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Because you are mandating that we pay "insurers" trillions of dollars that they will use to cook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. You don't see this as the insurance companies screwing themselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Only if we press for further reforms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 06:14 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I can't see us NOT pressing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. Here's an idea. If you don't follow the law, you will not be allowed to sell insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Well said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudohioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I sincerely hope that you're right!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cal Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. You think these companies are dumb? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Yes dumb. That's what happens when a historically unregulated industry becomes regulated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 01:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You're assuming the regulations will be enforced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Ask Goldman Sachs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. The "zealous" enforcement of work safety regulations leaves me skeptical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 05:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. And note the GS case is not criminal, just civil. ie - a slap on the wrist, and profitable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. At the very least we need the Medicare buy in bill HR4789 being promoted by Alan Grayson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 05:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
9. That's accounting fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 10:26 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. And accounting fraud is S.O.P. for a lot of large corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. And since Enron and Sarbanes-Oxley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
14. K and R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
16. Nail Em to the Wall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
17. Of Course they CAN & WILL circumvent the new "regulations". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. And this company is saying, "We don't need your stinking mandate!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
18. Well knock me over with a feather. What a surprise! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
23. When you make a deal with the devil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. and "Citizens United" means they have just begun to fuck us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC