amborin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-16-10 07:52 PM
Original message |
Robert Reich: HCR A Very Conservative Piece of Legislation, Bldg on Republican (Nixon) Foundation: |
|
"It’s not nearly as momentous as the passage of Medicare in 1965 and won’t fundamentally alter how Americans think about social safety nets. But the likely passage of Obama’s health care reform bill is the biggest thing Congress has done in decades, and has enormous political significance for the future.
Medicare directly changed the life of every senior in America, giving them health security and dramatically reducing their rates of poverty. By contrast, most Americans won’t be affected by Obama’s health care legislation. Most of us will continue to receive health insurance through our employers. (Only a comparatively small minority will be required to buy insurance who don’t want it, or be subsidized in order to afford it. Only a relatively few companies will be required to provide it who don’t now.) Medicare built on Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal notion of government as insurer, with citizens making payments to government, and government paying out benefits. That was the central idea of Social Security, and Medicare piggybacked on Social Security.
Obama’s legislation comes from an alternative idea, begun under the Eisenhower administration and developed under Nixon, of a market for health care based on private insurers and employers. Eisenhower locked in the tax break for employee health benefits; Nixon pushed prepaid, competing health plans, and urged a requirement that employers cover their employees. Obama applies Nixon’s idea and takes it a step further by requiring all Americans to carry health insurance, and giving subsidies to those who need it.
So don’t believe anyone who says Obama’s health care legislation marks a swing of the pendulum back toward the Great Society and the New Deal. Obama’s health bill is a very conservative piece of legislation, building on a Republican rather than a New Deal foundation. The New Deal foundation would have offered Medicare to all Americans or, at the very least, featured a public insurance option.
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-16-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
noise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-16-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is more credible than the teabaggers. They are pissed so obviously Reich is lying. Right?
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-16-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. K&R for the recognition of what ought to have been obvious to anyone informed about the policies |
|
and their origins and likely consequences.
|
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-16-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
4. As I keep saying, today's Democrats are to the right of Nixon |
|
I think a whole lot of people under 50 don't even know what a liberal would look like.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message |