Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mayor Gavin Newsom announced today City workers banned from official travel to Arizona

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:06 PM
Original message
Mayor Gavin Newsom announced today City workers banned from official travel to Arizona
City workers banned from official travel to Arizona

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom announced today a moratorium on official city travel to Arizona after the state enacted a controversial new immigration law that directs local police to arrest those suspected of being in the country illegally.

The ban on city employee travel to Arizona takes effect immediately, although there are some exceptions, including for law enforcement officials investigating a crime, officials said. It's unclear how many planned trips by city workers will be curtailed.

The move comes amid a cascade of criticism of Arizona's law, which has been denounced by civil rights groups, some police officials and President Obama, who said it threatens to "undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans." Legal challenges are being weighed to overturn it.

San Francisco's move comes as the Board of Supervisors introduced non-binding resolutions calling for comprehensive immigration reform and a boycott of Arizona because of the new law, which requires police to try to determine the immigration status of anyone they reasonably suspect of being in the country illegally. There are also online boycott campaigns calling for everything from a boycott of the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team to the Grand Canyon.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/cityinsider/detail?entry_id=62275&tsp=1#ixzz0mLfw3F5Z

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boycotting the D-Backs and Grand Canyon?
What did they have to do with any of this? Why not boycott Arizona Iced Tea (which I'm pretty sure is not from Arizona) or Joaquin Phoenix too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The problem is that the state didn't think about the
consequences of their decision. They only understand the loss of $$$$$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They'll figure that out from the lawsuits and administrative costs
long before they notice the drop in tourism money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Diamondbacks owners big Rethug Contributors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So are the Yankees and have been for years.
In either case, are the people of SF traveling to Arizona to see games? If the only chance they'd get to "boycott" would be to skip a Giants/D-backs game in SF, then who does that really hurt? They should petition the Giants to move to FLA for spring training.

As for the grand Canyon, aren't parts of that in other states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Let us know when New York enacts a Jim Crow law. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. So it's okay to back all the other shit the repukes have done for years...
but this is what puts you over the edge?

Is it okay to support a team who's owner backs the politicians that lie us into war and kill thousands of our own soldiers and hundreds of thousands of civilians, but not okay to support an owner who backs the politicians who do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8.  Not sure if you're joking, or if you're deliberately trying to cover for them....
http://www.edgeofsports.com/2010-04-24-521/index.html

"This will be the last column I write about the Arizona Diamondbacks in the foreseeable future. For me, they do not exist. They will continue to not exist in my mind as long as the horribly named “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act” remains law in Arizona. It's a law that has brought echoes of apartheid to the state.

One Democratic lawmaker has said that it has made Arizona a “laughingstock” but it’s difficult to find an ounce of humor in this kind of venal legislation. The law makes it a crime to walk the streets without clutching your passport, green card, visa, or state I.D. It not only empowers but absolutely requires cops to demand paperwork if they so much as suspect a person of being undocumented. A citizen can, in fact, sue any police officer they see not harassing suspected immigrants. The bill would also make it a class one misdemeanor for anyone to “pick up passengers for work” if their vehicle blocks traffic. And it makes a second violation of any aspect of the law a felony.

In response, Representative Raul Grijalva, who’s from Arizona itself, has called for a national boycott against the state, saying, “Do not vacation and or retire there.” He got so many hateful threats this week that he had to close his Arizona offices at noon on Friday.

Many of us aren’t in either the imminent vacation or retirement mode. We do, however, live in baseball cities where the Arizona Diamondbacks comes to play.

When they arrive in my hometown in D.C., my back will be turned, and my television will be off. This is not merely because they happen to be the team from Arizona. The D-backs organization is a primary funder of the state Republican Party, which has been driving the measure through the legislature.

As the official Arizona Diamondbacks boycott call states, “In 2010, the National Republican Senatorial Committee’s third highest Contributor was the Arizona Diamondbacks, who gave $121,600; furthermore, they also contributed $129,500, which ranked as the eighteenth highest contribution to the Republican Party Committee.” The team’s big boss, Ken Kendrick, and his family members, E. G. Kendrick Sr. and Randy Kendrick, made contributions to the Republicans totaling a staggering $1,023,527. The Kendricks follow in the footsteps of team founder and former owner Jerry Colangelo. Colangelo, along with other baseball executives and ex-players, launched a group called Battin’ 1000: a national campaign that uses baseball memorabilia to raise funds for a Campus for Life, the largest anti-choice student network in the country. Colangelo was also deputy chair of Bush/Cheney 2004 in Arizona, and his deep pockets created what was called the Presidential Prayer Team—a private evangelical group that claims to have signed up more than 1 million people to drop to their knees and pray daily for Bush.

Under Colangelo, John McCain also owned a piece of the team. The former maverick said before the bill’s passage that he “understood” why it was being passed because “the drivers of cars with illegals in it are intentionally causing accidents on the freeway.”

This is who the Arizona Diamondback executives are. This is the tradition they stand in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Okay, so I understand your point on the D-Backs
although I'm not sure how much Bay area support they get anyway, but what's the secret repuke past of the Grand Canyon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's just too dumb to deserve comment...
other than about how dumb it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ok, so if we're supposed to boycott the D-backs because it hurts the state of Arizona
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 08:12 PM by hughee99
what does the background of their owners really matter?

Either the boycott is for anything that will hurt the state of Arizona financially to show that how pissed people are, or it's targeting it at specific groups responsible for the law. Which is it?

I'm all for targeting any specific people or groups involved in the creation or passage of this idiotic law, but a boycott designed just to generally hurt the revenues of the state in general at the expense of the people who are going to have to suffer under it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Appropriate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC