Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teddy Kennedy once wrote an article on EFCA that explains the CARD-CHECK provision.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 07:51 PM
Original message
Teddy Kennedy once wrote an article on EFCA that explains the CARD-CHECK provision.
Free Choice

That’s why I have introduced the Employee Free Choice Act now pending in Congress. This important law protects the right of workers to form a union; requires employers to come to the table to negotiate a contract; authorizes court orders to stop employers from firing or threatening union advocates; and strengthens the penalties in current law for mistreatment of workers who support a union.

Under the bill, employees will be able to choose between two options for gaining union recognition—a card check or the NLRB electionprocess. Since anti-union conduct is so rampant in union election campaigns, the elections become coercive and hostile, rather than free and fair. Under current law, workers can try to avoid such elections by asking the employer to recognize their union based on a signed worker authorization—a card check; but employers often refuse to accept a card-check procedure. Even if all employees sign cards supporting union representation, the employer can still require an election. The bill preserves the rights of union members by requiring employers to bargain with a union authorized by a majority of workers through the card-check procedure.

As a result, workers’ chances of freely exercising their right to freedom of association increase dramatically. In fact, the card-check procedure is good for both employers and unions, since it promotes healthy relationships between employers and employees. Eliminating contentious elections from the certification process produces a better long-term relationship between union and employer.

http://www.lera.uiuc.edu/Pubs/Perspectives/onlinecompanion/fall05-Kennedy%20Article.htm

.......................................................................

Oh how I miss that man.

:patriot: Teddy!

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of my "pet" issues.
Obama needs to push HARD for this bill's passage.

This will weigh heavily in my evaluation of his first term performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree. I wrote another OP on this very issue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Union, Yes!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Word! Nice pic too. I copied it.
Thanks for posting it.

Solidarity!

:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Totally agree.
I was hoping it would be done by now. Most of my disappointment in this administration so far is the total lack of leadership on EFCA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC