Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US super-rich (top 400 families) get five times more income than in 1995

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:09 AM
Original message
US super-rich (top 400 families) get five times more income than in 1995


The incomes of the very rich in the US grew phenomenally between 1992 and 2007, while their tax rates plummeted, according to recently uncovered (feb) IRS statistics.

*** summary ***

-- average income for the top 400 families (1990 dollars) grew from $17 million to $87 million, a five-fold increase

-- the percentage of national income they took tripled from .52 percent in 1992 to 1.59 in 2007

-- their incomes increase by 31% between 2006 and 2007 alone

-- the average income of each family was $345 million (2009 dollars)

-- their effective tax rate on this group fell to 16.6%





The top 400 income earners received a total income of $138 billion in 2007. This figure is larger than the yearly output of most of the world’s countries, and is nearly as large as the GDP of Chile. Out of this amount, the group paid only $23 billion in taxes.

If the top 400 earners had been taxed in 2007 at the 1995 rate, they would have paid an additional $18.4 billion in taxes, enough to cover the entire 2010 budget shortfall of the state of California.

About three quarters of income for earners in this tax bracket came from capital gains, which were taxed at 15 percent, as opposed to income, which is taxed at a rate of 35 percent for the top bracket.

The latest figures come amid constant calls by the White House and Congress to cut social programs in order to balance the budget. The federal government, we are told, has been bankrupted by the “profligacy” of social programs and the proportion of social resources allocated to the general population. But the latest figures show that the opposite is true. It is the rich who have bankrupted the state, with the full assistance of the two big-business parties.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/feb2010/fams-f20.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wealth... Fuels....Tyranny.
Edited on Tue May-04-10 03:20 AM by Union Yes
knr

edit: someone unrecced, still at zero.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. it was not me
even though I think this OP is a re-run http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/123
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Same subject, different source.
The charts in this one are compelling, and mainly for that reason I'm saving this OP for future reference. This is a story that can't be told often enough IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. And vice-versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. And that is what the "Reagan Revolution" is really all about. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, it's just that simple.
Robin Hood in reverse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Except trickle down is the golden shower we get from the super-rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well that was just a snake oil sales pitch.
Nothing really trickled anywhere except maybe to other countries where there's cheap labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dupe. nt
Edited on Tue May-04-10 03:30 AM by bemildred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
tax the rich 5 times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. ^5
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. who are the 400 families?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Top 18 U.S. families
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Here is another source
http://www.citizen.org/documents/EstateTaxFinal.pdf

Scroll to pages 11 thru 13 where the 18 families are listed. This does not directly answer your question since it lists only those of the wealthiest who have bankrolled the estate tax repeal. The Gates and Buffett families, for example, would surely be among the top 400, but are not included in the 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. As I was looking at your top chart, it occurred that's what the inflation index should be
tied to. The CPI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Adding this article for posterity
The World Socialist Web Site article in the OP credits it with having first publicized the IRS report that was released but unannounced.

Tax Rates for Top 400 Earners Fall as Income Soars, IRS Data


Since 1992, the bottom 90 percent of Americans have seen their incomes rise by 13 percent in 2009 dollars, compared with an increase of 399 percent for the top 400.

The annual top 400 report was first made public by the Clinton administration, but the George W. Bush administration shut down access to the report. Its release was resumed a year ago when President Obama took office. The Statistics of Income Division at the IRS created the top 400 reports at the urging of Joel Slemrod, a business professor at the University of Michigan.

http://www.tax.com/taxcom/features.nsf/Articles/0DEC0EAA7E4D7A2B852576CD00714692
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Plutonomy, Plutocracy, Kleptocracy.....whatever you want to call it.....it's got to end.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC