Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bad Credit, No Job? Lawmaker tries to make candidates credit off-limits to employers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:33 PM
Original message
Bad Credit, No Job? Lawmaker tries to make candidates credit off-limits to employers
Bad Credit, No Job? Lawmaker tries to make candidates credit off-limits to employers


SACRAMENTO, CA- Does having bad credit make you a bad worker? One California assembly member says no and is moving to make the practice of checking a person's credit as part of the hiring process illegal in the state.

Assem. Tony Mendoza, D-Norwalk, says Assembly Bill 482 would restrict the practice of checking a job applicant's credit.

"In a brutal economy where unemployment is rising, workers don't need hurdles to find a job," said Mendoza, who wrote the bill.

Checking the credit of someone applying for jobs is legal in the state and more employers are doing it. But Mendoza says the practice can lead to forms of discrimination.

Some employers say credit checks can be a good thing and may protect companies from workers who may be distracted about debt.

http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?storyid=80729&catid=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Something similar was passed here in Maryland recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good.
Granted, it's necessary for certain security clearances but for most jobs it's not. The past two years have probably been hell on many people's credit scores, and with inaccuracies occurring so often as well, people who have the qualifications and pass the interviews should not have to worry about a bad credit score holding them back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree. It is none of the employer's business.
Edited on Tue May-04-10 03:42 PM by avaistheone1
How many of the employers themselves have bad credit? Plenty.

How many of the employers have filed for bankruptcy, and even more than once? Plenty.

How many of even the most respectable employers pay their bills late? Plenty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is about damn time someone took up this issue!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a nice idea, but I don't expect a lot of public support for it
I'm still somewhat floored over the fact that Oregonians voted a few years ago NOT to disallow the use of credit reports when auto insurance companies were setting rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. As it should be!
Big companies had the chance to get their business standing back. So far they haven't been prevented from dealing in the same bad practices.

Why should Americans citizens not get the same opportunity? Why should they be stopped from getting a job based on the credit rating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. About time this went nationwide..my credit rating has nothing to do with my ability..
..to do a job..and to infer otherwise is discriminatory..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's about time......
There's nothing more demoralizing than getting turned down for a job for which you are highly qualified because of "information obtained from your credit report".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Protect companies from workers who may be distracted by debt?
Holy fuck! They actually said that?

Or is this a "some say..." situation where the writer just wants to get his two cents in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yup, Next Thing You Know They'll Be Checking If Applicants Are Parents.
Wouldn't want workers to be distracted by the lives of their children.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Note to employers: Debt is a lot less distracting when you have a job. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Soon they will be asking for a blood draw to check for genetic anomolies.
Does your family have problems with cancer in their 40's? Then you, my friend will be retiring at age 39.

Sure these situation MIGHT not happen, but they likely could if the we continue on the road to becoming the Corporate States of Merica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. What about jobs requiring background checks and/or security clearances?
Bad Credit is considered adverse information for security clearnace purposes.
How will this law effect employers who need the applicant to pass a clearance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. e.g. bank tellers, FBI agents, armored car drivers, member of the B.O.D., even attorneys...
All would be exempt from the prohibition, presumably,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. My credit is fine; it's my URINE that should be off limits.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. They shouldn't hire people with children
"Some employers say credit checks can be a good thing and may protect companies from workers who may be distracted about their credit,"
Well what about those who get distracted by their children? Or have to go to school to meet with the teacher? What if their going through a divorce. Yes so many are distracted by debt alone. Better not hire them. What they're worried about is theft. Those who might be destitute might steal. Anyone's lives can be a distraction, rich or poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think everyone's credit scores should be reset on Jan 1....
... given how beat up most of us have been in one way or another financially over the past several years.

Give us all a fresh start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. protect companies from workers who may be distracted about debt.
The obvious solution..... pay them more.

Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. We should support this bill...
...before I retired I had HR telling me candidates were "suspect" because they had high credit card balances. This is a fairness as well as confidentiality issue and credit ifo should be off limits to prospective employers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Some employers" are full of $hit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC