Wiley50
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:03 PM
Original message |
What's the Use? Dems pass great Laws, Smirky justs Vetos them. IMPEACH! |
|
I'm pissed. Our folks have passed some great legislation since they've had the majority But not a single one of them will become law because they won't pass a veto and we can't get enough votes to overide
So far it's great PR and that's all
Just IMPEACH the fuckers
That should be priority #1
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I agree... Impeach Impeach Impeach! |
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. He can't let the country know that the democrats are really do what a congress should. |
|
They have got to impeach. And what they have to do is hold the republicans up to scrunity to show they are still supporting crooks and corruption of the bush administration. I think they should start their own PR campaign against McConnell, Blunt and Boehner. Thy should call them obstructionist.
|
Solo_in_MD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If they can't over ride a veto, they surely will not succed with impeachment |
|
The successful vetoing of legislation is not grounds for using impeachment as a hissy fit.
|
Wiley50
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Sat May-05-07 08:31 PM by Wiley50
difference what the flying monkey right will do before and after the wicked witch is dead
|
Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Solo - And that is the bottom line - - |
|
Wish some people on DU would get this through their heads- If you can't override a veto, you sure as hell will never get the necessary Senate votes to carry through with an impeachment.
|
eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message |
5. So when we have a Democratic president who vetoes a lot of Republican laws, s/he should be impeached |
|
too, right? What's fair is fair.
As someone else said in another thread: Lots of reasons to impeach. This ain't one of 'em. He's within his Constitutional rights and responsibilities to veto whatever the hell he wants, for whatever reasons.
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. FDR had 635 vetoes. Harry Truman had 250. |
|
Edited on Sat May-05-07 08:44 PM by Richardo
Bush has 2. One of them was on a bill passed by a Republican Congress (federal subsidies for stem cell research). What the hell are you talking about? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_vetoes
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |