Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kagan Said She Was `Not Sympathetic' Toward Gun-Rights Claim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:08 PM
Original message
Kagan Said She Was `Not Sympathetic' Toward Gun-Rights Claim
Edited on Thu May-13-10 08:17 PM by usregimechange

Elena Kagan, Nominee, US Supreme Court
Nominated by by Barack Obama on January 5, 2009
50 Years Old
J.D. Harvard Law School
Jewish


Elena Kagan said as a U.S. Supreme Court law clerk in 1987 that she was “not sympathetic” toward a man who contended that his constitutional rights were violated when he was convicted for carrying an unlicensed pistol.

Kagan, whom President Barack Obama nominated to the high court this week, made the comment to Justice Thurgood Marshall, urging him in a one-paragraph memo to vote against hearing the District of Columbia man’s appeal.

The man’s “sole contention is that the District of Columbia’s firearms statutes violate his constitutional right to ‘keep and bear arms,’” Kagan wrote. “I’m not sympathetic.”

http://preview.bloomberg.com/news/2010-05-12/kagan-said-she-was-not-sympathetic-toward-gun-rights-claim-in-1987-memo.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. But...but I thought she was secretly Antonin Scalia in disguise.
What am I supposed to think now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. God, I don't know, can't figure her out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. She sure rocks that Babs Bush pearl necklace and ear rings
Who needs guns? At least illegal ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. ummm... and?
Honestly, I don't know much about her yet as I have been a bit too busy to look but... This seems like a pretty weak ass argument against her. I agree with her statement here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What makes you think it was an argument against her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The article
The tone of it struck me as it being a negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Against her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Speaking as a gun owner and frequent shooter, neither am I.
If ones state has a licensing requirement, one has to comply with it. It's not unreasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. IBTM
Quick, to the GUNGEON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreatureFeature Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unless we support EVERY part of the Bill of Rights
we will live to regret it.

I am SO sick of the current crop of elitists in both parties that don't give a damn about the Bill of Rights. IMHO, eroding the Bill of Rights is nothing less than TREASON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. We have GOT to do something about quartering troops. It's getting out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC