Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton: "Lower the rhetoric. Goldman Sachs did nothing illegal."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:18 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton: "Lower the rhetoric. Goldman Sachs did nothing illegal."

Former President Bill Clinton says it is "time to lower the rhetoric and talk about the facts," in reference to the government's scrutiny of Wall Street.

In an exclusive interview with Maria Bartiromo, Clinton noted that while many financial firms are being questioned by the Securities and Exchange Commission, he does not believe that Goldman Sachs or CEO Lloyd Blankfein did anything illegal, based on what he's seeing.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/37149675
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. F--- You Bill. How much did they contribute to Hillary's campaign?
Or yours in the past?

STFU and sit down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM
Original message
Raise the rhetoric and broaden the focus to include EVERYBODY RESPONSIBLE.
IOW the people who helped make raiding the economy legal. As one of the contributors to that situation former President Clinton really shouldn't be telling anybody what to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
137. Far less than they contributed to Obama's campaign.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's cool that he is not afraid to stand up for what he thinks is right despite popular opinion.
It is the kind of thing that made him a strong leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. DLC sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. President Clinton is a lawyer. Should he lie and say he sees law breaking if he doesn't?
:shrug:

He said as far as he can see. That leaves room to make a case of for criminal wrong doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. As a side note, I saw this unfinished painting of Dr. House yesterday that someone is working on...
...and it has the caption "It's never lupus."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Depends on what the definition of "should" is.
He'd be better off just keeping his mouth shut rather than reminding us of how he helped pave the way for this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
52. +1
Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
133. I did not have a fiduciary relationship with that man, Mr. Blankfein...
Bill, I love ya, son, but there are times to speak and -- just as important -- times not to.

And with your background (gee, and who was it who signed the repeal of Glass-Stegall?), this just might be one of the times NOT to. Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. He lied well enough to stay in political office - but not well enough to keep his law license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. It's because he's a lawyer that he can say something like this
at this stage. A Defense Attorney.

The Special Inspector of Tarp, who is also a lawyer, doesn't agree with him and that's what really matters.

What Clinton is defending is reprehensible, keeping vital information from investors, selling them junk, and then betting on the failure of that junk.

But then, it was Clinton who signed the bill that rescinded Glass Steagal, so it's no surprise he would try to defend the collapse of the economy as a result of that disastrous decision.

Iow, he's not exactly a neutral observer of all this. His own actions as president will be judged by what has happened to this economy.

And hanging out with the Bushes everywhere there are disaster funds available, hasn't helped his credibility much either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
55. I have always loved Bill but he WAS disbarred for lying. So your point is moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
76. Correction: Clinton USED to be a lawyer.
He got thrown out for lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #76
89. Hardly
He AGREED to a 5 year suspension in order to end an almost 10 year Republicon witch hunt, which he could have easily continued to fight at the expense of millions more in legal bills. Since he had no intention of using his law license anyway, it was a no brainer and essentially a huge defeat for Ken Star who spent almost $100 million on a taxpayer funded partisan attack which ended with little more than his dick in his hand. But don't let the facts get in the way of rhetoric which would be better appreciated on a well known web site with a different ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #89
102. Clinton Disbarred by Supreme Court
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:29 PM by saracat
And I am a huge fan of Bill Clinton, though I do not always agree with him.I also disagree that he should have been disbarred.


Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court
By Anne Gearan

Associated Press Writer

Monday, Oct. 1, 2001; 10:48 a.m. EDT

WASHINGTON –– The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.

The court did not explain its reasons, but Supreme Court disbarment often follows disbarment in lower courts.

In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a $25,000 fine. The original disbarment lawsuit was brought by a committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court.

There are no fines associated with the Supreme Court action. Most lawyers who are admitted to the Supreme Court bar never actually argue a case there, but the right to do so is considered an honor.

Clinton agreed to the Arkansas fine and suspension Jan. 19, the day before he left office, as part of an understanding with Independent Counsel Robert Ray to end the Monica Lewinsky investigation.

The agreement also satisfied the legal effort by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct to disbar Clinton for giving misleading testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

The court order did not mention any vote by the justices.

"Whenever a member of the bar of this court has been disbarred or suspended from practice of any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the bar of this court, the court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this court," Supreme Court rules say.

Julia Payne, a spokeswoman for Clinton, referred calls to his lawyer, David Kendall, in Washington. Kendall did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. But what he "thinks is right" is often wrong.
Certainly is in this case. As it was when he signed NAFTA. As it was when he signed DOMA. As it was when he signed DADT. As it was when he signed the Murdoch/Clear Channel/Comca$t enabling act of 1996.

And as he was when he picked one of his best friends.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
73. How dare you? HOW DARE YOU?
sorry, just thinking of another example of a Clinton error and his arrogance about it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
120. I bet Junior is jealous.
Billy is the Son Poppy always wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
72. If he thinks he's "right" on this issue, it makes him a recalcitrant asshat.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
81. He backed an oppressive tyrant to head an international election monitoring organization
Guess he's gone against popular opinion before:


After Mining Deal, Financier Donated to Clinton

By JO BECKER and DON VAN NATTA Jr.
Published: January 31, 2008
Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

-snip


snip

"Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent."

"Mr. Nazarbayev walked away from the table with a propaganda coup, after Mr. Clinton expressed enthusiastic support for the Kazakh leader’s bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy."

-snip

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.

LINK:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
124. Strictly coincidental that he was financially in bed with them, right.
I try not to do this but it deserves:

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
128. Standing up for his golfing buddies and biggest contributors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
139. Pfft. Not even worth replying to.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
140. It made him an unashamed sellout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sometimes something can be perfectly legal, and absolutely wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. because our representatives legalized it
it remains UNETHICAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
49. And Clinton was the president who helped legalize it. So
he has a vested interest in defending it. His 'men' demonized Brooksley Born when she tried to warn against what they were doing and he allowed them to drive her out of her job. A decade later she turned out to be right. I'd rather hear Clinton admit how wrong he and Summers and Greenspan were and issue an apology to Brooksley Born and Sen. Dorgan and the others who tried to his administration from leading the country down this path.

He can commiserate with his new BFF, the Bushes. He's part of the ruling class, and although I spent years defending him, he no longer has any credibility on issues like this for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ah, yes: Ethics (the spirit) vs. Law (the letter). Bill C. ought not to tread thereon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. from the man who signed the repeal of Glass Steagall
:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
75. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
123. +2
BTW: How's NAFTA been treating your neck of the woods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
125. Boy did you hit the nail on the head
Hey Clinton you fuck nuts; they didn't do anything illegal because you made it legal you dumb ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
130. +10 And signed NAFTA
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sometimes, you're too close to the action to have any credibility at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Oh for heaven's sake, that explains one piece of the puzzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. & gore's daughter married a Kuhn, Loeb heir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
78. That says NOTHING about Karenna, her husband or Al Gore
The fact is that this is the circle that Gore and his children were born into. It was not an arranged marriage. It was two people falling in love and marrying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #78
88. The other poster noted Clinton's impending marriage to a Goldman hire;
I noted Gore's marriage to a Kuhn, Loeb heir.

I imagine Clinton's marriage is a love match too. So what?

Doesn't mitigate the fact that the political class & the financial class are one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #88
93. Sorry - didn't catch that
Yes, I get that the political elite and the financial elite are from one and the same group. Some like Clinton are not born into it, but by the time they are even close to national consideration they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. thanks for the cordial response. rare thing here.
glad you appreciate the difference between a personal attack on the character of individuals v. a comment on the structure of the ruling class & the cooptation of politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. thank you pointing out my error
I should have looked back over the full thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
105. !
"Mezvinsky, the son of former Pennsylvania Rep. Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky and former Iowa Rep. Ed Mezvinsky, now works as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-5836190-503544.html

All along, I thought the Nexus of Evil was Opus Dei / Skull & Bones / PNAC / DLC / The Family / Carlyle Group/ Bohemian Grove/ IMF /Trilateral Commission/ The FED.

It is much simpler.
Goldman Sachs IS The Singularity...the Black Hole from which all Evil emerges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
121. ah, that makes sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
134. Oh for fuck's sake, HIS DAUGHTER is marrying to a Goldman Sachs trader!
Yeah, yeah, how unfair of me to assign significance to a totally random association. It doesn't denote anything about this family's class affiliation, does it? Chelsea and Marc just ran into each other at a bus stop and it was love at first sight, right?

In my life of watching WANNABE PIGS, I've never seen a worse one than this character. He will do ANYTHING to whore himself out for the ruling class. He is in bed with the BUSHES. His whore billionaire economists, Summers and Rubin, are the ones who made the CRIMES of Goldman Sachs legal.

What more do we need to know about this motherfucker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fuck you, Bill. Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hey Bill, lets lower the bullshit okay?
What he said might be accurate, but why say it in the first place?

I still like Bill, but this statement is completely uncalled for. What's his point? It seems like CYA on the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Clinton needs to STFU as he certainly had a part in WHY what Goldman Sachs did is no longer illegal.
But then Clinton never saw a corporation that he could say no to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Can we stop pretending that Bill Clinton represents anything about Democratic values?
Except perhaps a long shameful period -sadly not yet behind us- in which we have capitulated body and soul to the marketing program of Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
96. All these bash Clinton posts make me feel like I'm in Freeperville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #96
112. well he said that no laws were broken
but are the laws ethical?

I mean, did Hitler break a law?
Did a slave beater break the law back in the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
108. Hear hear. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Right. And they purchased politicians like Mr. Clinton specifically to *make* those schemes legal.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 01:33 PM by Marr
Legal is not the same ethical. The fact that their acts were largely legal is a greater condemnation of the establishment, not an exoneration of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bill and most of the Dems in Congress today have become very rich
off of Wall Street...don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. He's not going to stop defending his "legacy" of punishing the poor to benefit the parasites.
He knows who writes the checks he cashes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Big Dawg"
Can we wait until the prelimary criminal probes are completed?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. me thinks the whole ball-o-wax is unraveling. Send the big dawg out
Edited on Fri May-14-10 01:38 PM by boston bean
to calm the masses and keep the cover for the corporatist facade. In truth, our democratic representatives and leaders are a bunch of corporate whores!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. The Big Dawg's been neutered ...
now only his con artist persona is oozing through. :wow:

"Now what is it going to take me to get you to believe this BUNK?!?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Crying shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Yes, all that intelligence and personality crossing over to the dark side. :( eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. I was a true believer of him too.
How disgusting to find out that people you admired turn out to be corporatist shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. " How disgusting to find out that people you admired turn out to be corporatist shills."
Did the fact that he has always been a strong advocate and member of the DLC not provide any clues?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. I think he's including Obama in that. How bout you???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. Um,
Edited on Fri May-14-10 03:10 PM by ProSense
no.

Unlike the Clinton Administration and the DLC, who are pro-deregulation, President Obama is pro-regulation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. I can tell, more exploratory drills, and giving waivers. The regulation is breathtaking! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #66
110. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Whatever ignore said, yes, you are correct.
We all get caught up in the hope and change and speeches, but the proof of the pudding is in the policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. DLC and Wall Street especially Goldman-sachs are joined at the
hip. This response would be expected from Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. The history of Goldman Sachs says otherwise,
regardless of what kind of legal technicalities you want to catch that fox with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. And now this from the man that said
I did not have sexual relations with that woman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. We'll let the DOJ be the judge of that, Billy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. ..So says the man that signed NAFTA and "Welfare Reform"...
NAFTA GAVE US THE SHAFTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. He's afraid somebody may look back at who let Wall Street get so fucked up
And one of the primary culprits is him.

Throw his fat lying as in jail with the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. they admit they didn't do anything illegal....just like the BP president
stated on TV today that they didn't do anything illegal...and that is the issue...they had carte blanche and knew it and took us for all we are worth..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. Dear Bil Clinton --
Back in the day I was a big fan, a True Believer who defended you until the day you left office.

I now have only one thing to say to you:

Shut up and go away. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. The outrage is because it wasn't illegal.
Anyway, people can still do what's right even if not legally required to do so. An action can be both legal and immoral at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. Marc Mezvinsky, Chelsea's finance, works for Goldman Sachs- hmmmmmmm
http://www.hellomagazine.com/profiles/chelsea-clinton/

"Marc Mezvinsky, a former intern in her father's White House who now works for Goldman Sachs."

...............

Did he mention that in the interview? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. +1 bingo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
86. Surprising!
I would have expected someone to point that out before the 34th response. Goldman Sachs and the Clintons are literally family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. He said while wearing a blindfold
...while his head was up Blankfein's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. Sez the man who signed the law that enabled the crisis.
I'll take his statement with a giant grain of salt, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
101. +1 Ding! Ding! Ding!
We have a winner folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. Good ol' Billl. Still triangulating (aka kissing up to) to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
74. Triangulating is just another word for collaborating.
Or at very best, appeasing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well if they did nothing illegal, what does that say?
That the social laws they wrote need to be changed, because they did do things that hurt people, and hurt the system, although helps a small group. And they did not operate within moral laws as most people see them.

So if a person makes an argument that it was not illegal, they make the argument for more legislation, or the argument that the law system in place is wrong.

Is he saying they should be allowed to do what ever they want without social input into systems with economic influence? Thereby defending what most think of as a broken system, or is he making the argument for overhaul and change to that broken system?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. Bill Clinton is a corporate asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
44. Reason # 5,115 of why Bill Clinton was NEVER a liberal
despite Rush Limbaugh's claims
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. mmmm hmmmm... yup. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
50. Was it illegal before all the regulation gyrations?
I'm tired of hearing "it's not illegal". It was once. Just because they finagled the system, doesn't make it less egregious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptical cynic Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
53. Doesn't mean much
Coming from one of the pioneers of Democratic support for neoliberal economics.

Bill Clinton is the politician that made membership in the Democratic Party meaningless for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
54.  Geez Bill stepped in this one. The man does love "technicalities."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. Well then I guess he is looking at faulty intelligence, because
it is quite obvious you cannot bet on (secretly) a guaranteed fail. I've never seen so many people in love with GS, which would sell their soul in a heartbeat for a nickle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
58. Bill, S.T.F.U.
Bill, I will admit, you did do some good for this country, but you were determined to undo a lot of it for purely selfish reasons, not the least of which was you wagging your finger and lying in a manner that was so ridiculous you jumped the shark. I won;t even mention how YOU ruined your wife's campaign by trying to take it over and tell gaffes that pratically put Obama is the White House, or the documented fact that, while Obama wanted HIllary for VP, his advisors were scarred that YOU would walk in and steal the show from both of them.

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/10/obama_weighed_hillary_worried.html

And this is in addition to the fact that policies you esposed have turned out to be screaming fiascos, like NAFTA (which made Mexcians so poor they cannot afford their own corn), the Telecommuncations act (which gave the Media to Fox and Rush) and the repeal of Glass-Steagall (which tuned our economy into a Casino that is much less reuglated than Vegas.)

Bill, if you have anything more to say, you need to turn your head left. Left is what served you, even though you poorly served it. If not, STFU, or else, we can bury you and your legacy in the same Potter's field that we reserve for the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
113. +1000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
60. "Sit Bill, sit. Bark. Howl.
Fetch. Play dead. Good Bill." -Goldman Sachs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
61. Hey, Bill...
...how about we crank up the rhetoric until these shits are held accountable for their larceny and greed that has caused untold misery here and around the world? How about we expose these bastards who pounce like vultures on sovereign debts that they helped to create and then to hide? How about we go after GS and all of their apologists, including you?

This makes me ill. He's become part of the monied class. Well, I suppose that is one of the primary motivations for going into politics in the first place.

Damned shame, though. We could have used him on our side. But on this matter he is definitely not on the side of the little guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
64. "LEAVE GOLDMAN SACHS ALONE!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. ---
:spray:

Never gets old :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. ,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #64
83. Oh, you got me.
:spray:

Time to go find some napkins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #64
84. That picture is CRYING OUT for a photoshop job!!
Unfortunately, I lack both the software and the necessary skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #64
122. lol
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
67. Surprised? He aided and abetted this mess........
And the Obama administration has grabbed the baton.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
68. President Clinton's support enabled the de-regulation of the banks and financial services industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
70. Maybe they didn't...
Maybe the regulations were dropped, and what they did was within the "law." Please note the irony quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
71. I agree with him only as far as there MIGHT be enough legal LOOPHOLES in place...
...that they didn't technically break any laws. I've seen convincing arguments on both sides of that. Ultimately, if the answer is that they didn't break any laws, then the next question is should what they did be against the law, and the answer to that is of course, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
77. Lap Dawg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. First Lady BlahBlah, now this.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
80. FUCK YOU, you DLCer and protege of a defender of the Elites.
That defender being historian Caroll Quigley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
82. Well of course he did.
Big Dawg...Still playing for the same team...the Corporate Ownership Society.
Some things never change.
I have some compassion for the Old Dawg today.
He is fixing to lose his crown.
His title of "Best Republican President Ever" is in jeopardy.
It won't be near as much fun being "2nd Best Republican Ever."

Nobody ever wants to Thrill Fuck 2nd Place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
85. Hey Big Dawg.. the FBI Called and left a message...
.. they want to know something about your fingrprints on Ron Browns Airplane?

Also something about a note Vince Foster left before he disappeared?

Please call them back... thanks....


< > While you were out
< x> Please call back
< > Urgent
< > no message

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
87. Gotta love that cuddly "Big Dog"
:puke:

Of course, what he did to poor women and children was just fine. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. realized he was a phoney when he demagogued the sister souljah thing.
and imo, the sister is a phoney too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. You gotta admit... he has a very good "aw shucks" act.
Kinda like a lot of "helpers" I know.

Too bad we can't even say on DU that we weren't taken in by the slick act of the other one. I figured out his act back in '04, and am not surprised at any of what we have now.

Sad, yes.

Despairing, yes.

Surprised, no.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. good act if one likes smarm.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:12 PM by Hannah Bell
seem to remember obama had his own sister souljah moment.

it seems to be an obligatory ritual for dems if they want power: prove you'll throw the left under the bus! send a signal to "investors"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
94. He's always driven me up the wall.
I didn't vote for him twice because of crap like this. I think the first time I ever felt a faint squirt of affection for him was when he got up and danced to Chuck Berry at the last Kennedy Center Honors under his presidency. I'll be interested to see if Gore sticks his neck out on this (another one I can't stand).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
98. Bill Clinton is a self described "new Democrat."
AKA half a Republican. He is the person who inked Phil Gramm's bill that pretty much caused the financial mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #98
106. So is Barack Obama.
”I am a New Democrat!”---Barack Obama
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=254931&kaid=85&subid=900184



The DLC New Team
Working Class Democrats need NOT Apply

(Screen Capped from the DLC Website)


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans."---Paul Wellstone



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #106
116. I love that shot of Wellstone. He looks like he's ready to do the ground and pound...
...on some dumbass conservative. Or maybe just throttle one with his bare hands.

He was a stocky solid looking dude wasn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
99. Bill "Calvin Coolidge" Clinton.
Fuck off, Bubba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. ;>) cool clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
103. fricking shill
thanks for supporting corruption and opening the flood gates to corporate America into our political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
104. k&r perhaps b/c the paper trail leads back
to bipartisan repeal of Glass Steagall?

or more likely, he's too cozy with this admin, w/ its numerous GS alum and connections.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
107. Fuck you ..
... Bill Clinton, the main Democrat responsible for this fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
109. The fact that what they did is legal IS the problem.
And it is at least partially your fault, Bill. For signing the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act, among your other pro-corporate sins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
111. Just a good ol boy.. never meanin no harm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
114. One must ask exactly what did Goldman Sachs do that was
illegal. Not wrong. not unethical, but illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #114
118. We don't have to ask, Bill Clinton has assured us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #114
132. Engage in a vast conspiracy to commit fraud...
in collusion with a selection of their clients, the fraud firms that sold the mortgages, the consultants and "analysts" that deceived investors about the junk securities, the ratings agencies that certified known junk as AAA (just months before much of it was downgraded to junk, but by then the suckers had already bought it).

In Goldman's case there's also plenty of evidence of front-running via HFT software, naked shorting of Bear Stearns and Lehman with intent to cause (not merely cash in on) their bankruptcies, and manipulation of the oil market in 2008. They've been a mob for decades.

It's all a question of attitudes, cultural definitions and the will to go after them.

If the mafia was caught on exactly the same evidence doing the same things as GS, they would have been declared a criminal organization. A certain prejudice would have underlain this determination: presumed mobsters who hang out together and happen to get very rich are (with justification) prejudicially presumed to be engaging in a conspiratorial organization structured so as to hide their specific crimes.

This is why RICO statutes were created, to allow prosecutors to have their operations seized.

That would have already happened to Goldman and the rest of the Wall Street gangsters, but because our culture happens to define these particular organized criminals and their vast fraud scheme as "bankers" doing "business," the RICO and other broad fraud statutes are not applied.

If they didn't have the presumption of respectability and of course the terror threat of "too big to fail," you would definitely be talking about them in the past tense. They would have been like Enron and Arthur Anderson: shut them down first so that they can no longer engage in rapine and plunder, then figure out who gets charged with which crime. (Enron went bankrupt of course, but AA was SHUT DOWN, exactly what should have happened to GS, S&P, and the rest.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
115. K & R for exposure of DLC agenda. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
117. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
119. Neither did Hitler, until he invaded Poland.
The problem is that what they did was MADE legal.


And people that confuse "it's legal" with "it's moral" deserve all the scorn and hatred they deserve.


Imagine Congress passing a bill allowing the hunting of hedge fund managers with the purchase of a $20 license. Well, then, gunning down fatcats with scope-sighted rifles would then be perfectly legal, right? So would Phil Gramm say "Hey hey hey, they're not doing anything illegal"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #119
127. Correctamundo
Btw, fuck Godwin and his stupid 'law'.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
126. Translation: "I did my part in repealing the laws against the crimes that GS committed."
All this deserves is: "Fuck you, you fucking fuck."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
129. Tsk! Tsk!
And this coming from the man who pardoned Marc Rich on his last day in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
131. Big Dawg took another shit in the nest did he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #131
135. 'Big Dawg' my ass...'Lap Dawg' has always been more accurate. Really tough work enabling BushInc
and the fascist agenda all those years, eh Bill?

The 90s: One grand Dog and Pony Show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #135
136. Harsh,
but I'm inclined to let you speak for me on this one. :>)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
138. Oh goodie, one more anti-Clinton thread.
Let me go see what the Freepers are up to, at least I know where they are coming from and don't expect any better........

:puke:

Considering that Obama received more money from GS than any other candidate in 2008, the outrage against Bill is quite hypocritical. Then again, par for the course on this board.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #138
141. Sorry, but it's deserved in this case.....and Obama deserves the criticism too.....
Since he adopted all of Clinton's Goldman Club into his administration. The truth is the truth.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #141
146. The difference is that Obama portrayed himself to be a "change" factor and he's more of the same.
He was a B.S. artist during the primaries and he's still one now.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #138
143. A Goldman Sachs supporter .... What a surprise
I would have cheered Bill if he had slammed them but he didn't, you are blind in your allegiance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #143
145. Not a GS supporter, just sick and tired ot the Clinton hate on this board.
What does Clinton's sexual peccadilloes and Chelsea's fiance's job have to do with his statement that people should not be too quick to judge? I think that GS is a sack of s**t, but I have no idea if illegalities were committed by them.

;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #138
144. you think the OP doesn't post criticisms of Obama ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #144
147. I don't know.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #144
149. I can't win.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
142. Goldman Sachs made the Greek crisis possible fuck you bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
148. Damn the corporate loving DLC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC