Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Socialism and communism is about big government?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
murdoch Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 03:28 PM
Original message
Socialism and communism is about big government?
I never understand when watching TV how communism is discussed. These people seem to know nothing about it. I guess in two parts they are confused - the communist movement and socialist states like the USSR.

The government is not really important in the communist movement. In fact, in the 19th century, Marx and the communists were together with Bakunin and the anarchists in the International Working Men's Association. One of their main disagreements was over the government - Marx wanted communists to take over the government when workers seized power from the capitalists, Bakunin wanted the government dissolved immediately. Marx said the government would need to exist as long as necessary, but eventually could be dissolved.

Also, it is said the government owned and controlled everything in the USSR. The government did not. For example, kolkhozes (collective farms) were owned by the people who worked on them. There were also individual family farms. There were also production cooperatives. Many people owned their own homes.

In fact, the thing that really broke the USSR up was that the government and managers of the production facilities that were state-run became more and more distant from one another. Even these de jure state-run factories were de facto being run by the local foreman and workers, and after the USSR collapsed would be owned by them.

People can be happy or unhappy about things in the USSR, or the communist movement, but their feelings should be based on reality, not cartoonish ideas. I remember Reagan told the BBC once that the word freedom couldn't be translated into Russian because there was no Russian word for freedom (not sure why he didn't consider Свобода acceptable). These thoughts come to me after watching maybe too much Glenn Beck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. See below, please:
When I tried to post your parenthesised comment, I got a strange message about long titles and spacings!

'(not sure why he didn't consider Свобода acceptable).'

Love your understatement. People aren't supposed to know Russian, though. I'm sure Reagan would have been fluent in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC