|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:45 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you support mandatory DNA collection upon arrest of anyone for anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, it would create a lot of jobs. We can all swab the shit out of each other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Your question has some vague wording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I'm for DNA collection in the cases of murder and rape CONVICTIONS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. What if the DNA collection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-23-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. WWLBD? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chemisse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think I could support it for those who have been CONVICTED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. You beat me to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I am talking about all arrests, including minor offenses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Public comments were being solicited by the Feds up until May 19th. Damn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. No--only for convictions, and even then, only for violent crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Can you get your record expunged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. No idea. Not even sure what that means, to be honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
26. Expungement would render the information invisible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. It closed a cold case homicide here with a Felony DWI arrest & conviction here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. If an anti-war protester is arrested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. There is no question that such policies help catch criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. I would support it for any violent crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
era veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. Hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
17. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
18. Of Course Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
20. Of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
21. NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't think people should be finger printed or even have photos taken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. Arrest would be fuck no and conviction would slip all the way to hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onceuponalife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. Only anti-gay Republicants should be subject to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
25. I can't come up with any good reason why not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
27. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
28. The only reason that DNA should be collected at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-23-10 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
29. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC