J.D. Hayworth, you are an ignorant idiot. Here's the proof:

[krispos42]

Shut your piehole and suck on a teabag. If you can't be a productive member of society,
at least try to not be a destructive member of society.


Hellishly warmest regards,
Krispos42

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. What an idiot!

Even I knew that Germany declared war on us.

Thanks for the proof.

[krispos42]

4. Coffee table books do have their uses, CaliPeg

The whole page wouldn't quite fit on my scanner, but enough of it did. :-)

[neverforget]

2. Damn liberal lies!

JD reminds me of Fat Bastard

[krispos42]

6. The same people that went back in time to 1961 and put Obama's birth announcement in the paper...

...also went back to 1941 and changed the New York Times, of course...





...just ask any birther :crazy:

[neverforget]

7. That and the black helicopters

[Drunken Irishman]

3. We should print these out and send 'em to his campaign office by the thousands.

[krispos42]

5. Right-click save is your friend

It's on photobucket... knock yourself out.


You can link to it too if you want. :hi:

[Ichingcarpenter]

8. Totally agree

It would be very effective

[petronius]

9. Fascinating page. That column on the left describing US military successes

is a pretty important lesson as well - a lesson in not believing rosy official announcements in time of war or crisis...

[krispos42]

10. Yup. The page for Dec. 8th heavily minimized the Pearl Harbor losses.

The book is significant front pages from the NY Times from 1900 to 2000. It's pretty darn cool :-)

[petronius]

11. Sounds awesome. My wife's birthday is coming up, I may have to get

a copy for me for us for her... :)

[krispos42]

12. It's called "The New York Times Page One", if that helps any n/t

[WeDidIt]

13. You've got to do better than the librul New York Times!

:sarcasm:

[krispos42]

14. Well, Matt Drudge wasn't yet an itch in his daddy's pants, so...

:shrug:

I'm sure the pictures of FDR are Photoshopped anyway. Took a while on the ENIAC, hey, George Soros has plenty of money and influence, right???

[krispos42]

15. Afternoon kick

And shameless Rec jonesing...

[Scurrilous]

16. K & R

:thumbsup:

[11 Bravo]

17. Not for nothing was JD a perennial on the dumbest congresscritter list.

[Liberal_Stalwart71]

18. I hope it doesn't hurt him too badly. I'm rooting for J.D. Hayworth.

I hope he beats McGrampa!

Who's the Democrat, if any, running for that seat in Arizona?

[SargeUNN]

19. I find it interesting you would root for Hayworth but

not know who the Democrats are running for the office. I live and vote in Arizona so I do know who is running, but I also know how the Democrats in this state work. I have heard Democrats in this state say they hope Hayworth wins because he would seem to be more beatable, yet we have 3 Democrats running and some Democrats are turning against the front running Rodney Glassman because he didn't attend a protest in Tucson, because of the family he grew up in. The sad reality is with this much infighting among Democrats in Arizona, Hayworth beats McCain and we will be stuck with a man who is supported by a documented Neo-Nazi named J.T. Ready, good friend of Russell Pearce who introduced SB1070. While I dislike McCain very much I don't want Hayworth as my Senator and I am not convinced the Democrats here in Arizona are going to unite enough to get our Democratic Candidate elected.

[Liberal_Stalwart71]

20. Thanks for the information. My question wasn't meant to provoke snarkiness, but I just feel

that McCain needs to go. He really is no better than Hayworth. He has sold his sold for politics, and no matter how you may think about him, at the very least, Hayworth is more honest in his bigotry and ignorance. As for the Democrats, I don't think that it's impossible for them to unite if there is a chance to beat Hayworth. Both McCain and Hayworth are pathetic and disgusting, so I'm not quite sure I understand the difference.