WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-27-10 12:50 PM
Original message |
Obama: There will be a response shortly on the Sestak issue |
|
I'm betting they offered him the job before he announced for the Senate seat and before they offered the job to Mabus.
|
Phoebe Loosinhouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-27-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I hope so. The wingnuts have gotten way too much traction out of it |
|
If you Google Sestak one of the first things to come up is Sestak "bribe".
They were slow on the draw stifling this and should have done it long ago.
|
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-27-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Did whats-his-name (the Fox guy) just get "dismissed" or what? |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-27-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Major Garrett. I have the TV on in the background & as soon as |
|
hear that string of questions I had to turn to see WHO THE HELL IS TIS AH? Of course it was a FOX guy! Does the Prez want that image of having his boot on the neck of BP? Og course our Prez was more controlled than I would have been. I would have said HELL YES! As to the Sestak issue, who cares! I sure don't! Even a reporter on MSNBC just now said that a little research has shown that every admin. both Pub & Dem has done the same thing. He feels the problem with the Obama admin doing it is because tey promised to be the most transparent of all and this shows it isn't. Maybe it was a promise to Arlan back when he was thibkibng about switching parties that they would make re-election aas smooth as possible for him? Maybe Joe WAS offered the position of Sec. of the Navy because they thought he was the best choice!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message |