Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama picks oil exec to probe oil disaster (Maddow blog)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:18 PM
Original message
Obama picks oil exec to probe oil disaster (Maddow blog)
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 05:19 PM by Mari333

President Obama today promised a full investigation into the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster. Obama said the administration will consider whether what has happened amounts to a crime and won't allow new offshore drilling until we know what went wrong.

As Obama spoke, he was flanked by the two co-chairs of the bipartisan National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. The Republican co-chair, William K. Reilly, has spent a career in the industry he'll now probe. A former chief of the Environmental Protection Agency, Reilly currently serves on the board of directors of:

* ConocoPhillips
* DuPont, which provides technologies for oil and gas extraction
* Energy Future Holdings, a Texas-based electric utility company








http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/01/4447199-obama-picks-oil-exec-to-probe-oil-disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. k+r
do you have an op with this graphic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No.
It's not something of which I am proud.... help us Obama.... :cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
49. Understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey it's the cleanest republican he could find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. That pretty much sums it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. So former head of the EPA, and on the board of one of BP's main competitors...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. They are partners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. And, Bob Graham is the Democrat. who has been chosen to
lead a presidential commission to investigate the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

<snip> Bob Graham..

"Governor of Florida"

"Bob Graham was elected Governor of Florida in 1978 after a seven-way Democratic primary race in which he initially placed second to Robert L. Shevin. His supporters at the time dubbed themselves "Graham crackers." With this victory, he realized his father's dream: Cap Graham had run unsuccessfully for the Democratic nomination to be Governor of Florida back in 1944. Graham was re-elected in 1982 with 65% of the vote, defeating Republican nominee Skip Bafalis.

As governor he was probably best known for appreciating that a quality education is of central importance to the future of Florida and is still now often remembered as the "Education Governor." By the end of his second term the Florida state university system was among the first quartile of state systems in America and it spublic schools and community colleges had substantially improved their academic standing.

In addition to Education Governor Graham's administration focused on Economic diversification and Environmental policies. During his tenure as Goverenor the state added 1.2 million jobs and for the first time in state history the per capita income of Floridians exceeded the US average. For 3 of his 8 years Florida was rated by the accounting firm Grant Thornton as having the best business climate of all states in the union.

Also, as Governor, Graham launched the most extensive environmental protection program in the state's history, focused on preserving endangered lands. During his tenure thousands of acres of threatened and environmentally important lands were brought into state ownership for permanent protection. His keystone accomplishment was the establishment of the Save the Everglades program, which as now been joined by the federal government in a joint effort.


Graham left the Governorship with an 83% approval rating."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Graham

http://antipollutionrevolutioncampaign.blogspot.com/2010/05/former-senator-appointed-to-investigate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That's great news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Thanks for providing all the facts that were mysteriously missing from the story
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Took one look and knew there would
be more facts to the story.:)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. that is a serious misrepresentation
Giving you the same courtesy the MSM gave President Bush.

The OP is about the one appointee. There was no attempt at hiding anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. the revolving door
A board member from an oil company was head of the EPA, and that makes him OK? Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Uh huh.
So being on the board of an oil company makes him bad? Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. of course
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 06:28 PM by William Z. Foster
How can you have public agency that exists for the purpose of protecting the public from an industry and then have those agencies run by people from that industry?

Holy shit, we now have people who call themselves Democrats openly promoting and defending the Reagan approach to "regulation" and beating the crap out of anyone that takes issue with that. This is just so amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. beating the crap?
My oh my.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. or whatever
As I typed that I thought "they will pick out that one phrase and use it as a distraction" and sure enough.

OK, not "beat the crap out of" then. How about this - "relentlessly throw out snarky one-liners, find any excuse at all for going off on tangents and disrupting the conversation, try everything possible to frustrate and irritate people, work as many insults and personal attacks in as they possibly can - all carefully and cleverly phrased, using inference and insinuation so as to stay barely within the rules - and then disappear without defending or supporting their position as soon as they are effectively countered or have done as much damage to the thread as they possibly can."

Better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
65. Yeah, it's the whole "fox/henhouse" thing
I would think you'd be able to pick up on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
68. Yeah, that is a pretty strong sign. Cheney's folk. Dubbya's folk.
Greedy fucks. Shit on the habitat. Capture and buy alternate vehicle and battery tech to enrich themselves.

Yeah, they're shitty enough to throw out a random baby with the bath water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #38
70. So Christine Todd Whitman is a great environmentalist, too?
lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. lolol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. At least he didn't pick someone with a conflict of interest.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. So who is the Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. shhhhh!!! You're not suppose to think and ask questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Republican Co-Chair???!!!"""
I GIVE UP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. heck I gave up when Rick Warren spoke at the inauguration....
I knew it was bad times ahead back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. You're surprised a BI-PARTISAN committee is co-chaired by a Republican?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
62. :nodding:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I peeked into this thread just to see the heads exploding. I'm not disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
71. So glad to hear you're happy about..
massive environmental destruction and corporate cover ups.

Thanks for sharing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Cover-up and plausible deni ability time.
One cover for BP is the permitting process that will be used by BP as a defense (their actions were approved and monitored) and the systematic mockery of the NEPA process by science turned political in DOI and MMS. The guilty in the Feds are easy to identify by paper trail.

This is the largest environmental disaster in USA history.

BP USA should be in receivership and BP asset's and talent dedicated to the gusher. Other USA oil companies have an obligation to be involved in drilling backup relief wells, skimming ships, no dispersant, and other extreme priority actions.

I see negligent manslaughter and crimes against humanity (and the planet) for decision-makers in the private sector (BP et al) and the lazy ass negligent ass hat Fed employees. I include Salazar as he is no dummy; basically James Watt without crazy Fundie and blatant lying (Watt re:LP) in appointment.

Realistically, I don't expect much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Bob Graham does not do cover-ups. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. +1 for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
72. Yeah, he's a real boy-scout, alright.
So's his 9/11 breakfast buddy, Porter Goss.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. How about his other 9/11 breakfast buddy?
Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed - head of Pakistan's ISI

Here is some info from Paul Thompson's timeline:

http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a091101mahmoodmeeting#a091101mahmoodmeeting

Around 8:00 a.m., on September 11, 2001, ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed is at a breakfast meeting at the Capitol with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) and Representative Porter Goss (R-FL), a 10-year veteran of the CIA’s clandestine operations wing. Also present at the meeting are Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and the Pakistani ambassador to the US, Maleeha Lodhi, as well as other officials and aides. (Goss, Kyl, and Graham had just met with Pakistani President Pervez Mushrraf in Pakistan two weeks earlier (see August 28-30, 2001)).

Graham and Goss will later co-head the joint House-Senate investigation into the 9/11 attacks, which will focus on Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, but will say almost nothing about possible Pakistani government connections to al-Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks (see August 1-3, 2003 and December 11, 2002). Note that Senator Graham should have been aware of a report made to his staff the previous month (see Early August 2001) that one of Mahmood’s subordinates had told a US undercover agent that the WTC would be destroyed. Some evidence suggests that Mahmood ordered that $100,000 be sent to hijacker Mohamed Atta (see October 7, 2001).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm shocked!
Oh, wait. No, I'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Can you find a cleaner republican for a bi-partisan panel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Red Herring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. You didn't answer the rather pertinent question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Clean Republican? Are we playing favorite oxymoron? LOL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #30
69. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. *facepalm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. So someone who actually knows something about the oil industry and is a former WWF dir, EPA admin.
I'm not sure what the problem is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Plus he is only the Republican half of the panel leadership
the Dem is Sen Bob Grahm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. So he'll know what questions to ask.
He'll also know how to cover things up so one can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I dunno. The guy's background suggests a strong pro-environmental life.
Especially being a WWF president. Hopefully that means he is the kind of guy that takes this incident very personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. 'Republican co-chair, William K. Reilly, has spent a career in the industry he'll now probe.' Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benchwarmer Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. Sometimes you need evil to fight evil or something like that
It probably helps the effort actually.
This is one of those things where it depends on how you look at it. One hand he's the enemy, other hand he KNOWS the enemy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Ah, I see, pragmatic. Forgot about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. B-O-B G-R-A-H-A-M is the co-chair.
A straight shooter if there ever was one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. One of the founders of NDC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. He had a excellent environmental record as Gov of Florida.
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 07:46 PM by emulatorloo
Which says more of what he will do here, than his membership in some dumb useless impotent club.

Also, as Governor, Graham launched the most extensive environmental protection program in the state's history, focused on preserving endangered lands. During his tenure thousands of acres of threatened and environmentally important lands were brought into state ownership for permanent protection. His keystone accomplishment was the establishment of the Save the Everglades program, which as now been joined by the federal government in a joint effort.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Graham#Governor_of_Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Not to mention a Blue Dog corporatist. Yippee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. "the most extensive environmental protection program in [Florida's] history"
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 07:48 PM by emulatorloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. OK, what if that state's history is LOUSY on enviromental protection?
Or do you just reprint talking points? Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. OH FFS! n/t
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 06:48 PM by Subdivisions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
44. What a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
45. What a ridiculous post.
It is a bipartisan commission, so he had to pick a Republican to be the Republican co-chair. You conveniently forgot to mention he appointed Bob Graham as the Democratic co-chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. Reilly presided over Exxon Valdez invest; picked by poppy Bush
nothing will come of this; just platitudes about being "careful"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
50. More oil execs. How nice n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
52. A Republican oil exec and a blue dog from the corporate wing. How apt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. I'm sure nobody from the Democratic Environmental Caucus was available.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
volvoblue Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
60. actually this is someone the president needs.
How can anyone expect someone without knowledge of the oil ind. to know where the bodies are buried and the closets the tricks are hidden in.
You need someone who knows these things and where to look and can smell bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Oh, I think you can have "knowledge" of the oil industry without being in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
63. Let me guess: he'll recommend a tax cut and socialized losses for BP?
:shrug: I almost forgot: more offshore drilling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
66. I am totally sick of promises of "full investigations". I want actions from those investigations. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
67. Sigh . . . getting harder and harder to think about Obama .... we need relief!!
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 10:26 PM by defendandprotect
Liberal and progressive relief -- !!!

What Dem can we run in 2012? Not too early to think about that!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC