Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will someone who is better informed on corporatism tell me what is wrong with this idea?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:47 PM
Original message
Will someone who is better informed on corporatism tell me what is wrong with this idea?
I hate big business, but we're stuck with it.

And I hate that many corporations are moving their corporations to other countries in order to avoid paying their taxes here in the US.

So I thought of a plan that could work, but I don't know whether it could get any kind of steam behind it.

Those companies who keep their corporate offices outside of the US should be obliged to pay tariffs UP TO and possibly AT the rate of taxes they would be paying within the US. And while they're doing that, companies who remain in the US should get a small break for stayed US corporations.

This wouldn't affect real foreign corporations, only those who moved out of the country because they're greedy assholes. A lot of them became Bermuda companies, for example. There are, I'm sure, records of all such corporations if anyone got the chance to look for them.

And this could also count for another situation--those who left the US because they didn't want to pay equitable wages to the workers. All one has to do is look at the salaries of the higher management, and it'll be easy to determine who is a fair employer, and which ones aren't.


Anyone else think this is a potentially good idea? I think it would offer back enough employment when companies have to come back to being US corporations to help out handsomely. And it certainly would spot potential Enrons earlier, because the books would be audited on a regular basis. Treat them like the criminals we all know they are. IF they want money, they have to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're on the right track...
... no way should they be able to shirk their tax liability simply by moving the HQ offshore. You want to earn money in the US, pay taxes, fair and square. Soon there won't be any US-headquartered corps and all their tax burden will be shifted to the taxpayer.

Secondly, any company shipping US jobs offshore to save a buck should be fined on a dollar-for-dollar basis. If they only want to pay Vietnamese children a dollar a day, they can pay the rest of the minimum wage in penalties, plus payroll taxes they're avoiding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Chuck Schumer is actually taking a stand on offshoring
Check the Late Breaking News forum for the full story, but in a nutshell, he wants companies who offshore customer service to (1) tell you they are transferring your call overseas and (2) make them pay $0.25 for every call transferred.

Its a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. My deal is about free trade
How come only capital gets to operate transnationally in 'free' trade? If capital gets to, so should labor be free to market their labor in other markets, regardless of where the individual holds citizenship. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I'll go further than you
I want that labor to be able to organize into transnational unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Exactly!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Looking for more suggestions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. There are may good ideas -- New Deal was a great idea. . . the problem is
with this great wealth having bought our government and its agencies --

In other words, we have a co-opted government and government officials betraying

us every day!

How do we end this corruption is the question --

so that we can enact sane policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is a little problem with that. Those corporations you want to control, own Congress. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. You would have to repeal the misnomered "free trade agreements" and the Dems aren't going to
do that and neither are the Repos.

Too much corporate cash tells them no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. That is more or less what we did for over 200 years
you see NOBODY said that you could not bring shoes to the country. Just that you had to pay up to the actual cost of production in the US... in tariffs. That made all the advantage of moving to cheap labor centers go away... (and to be fair we had our own cheap labor)

All that went away in the 1980s...

And yes kiddies I just simplified US history a bunch, but this is more or less what used to happen...

Alas all the legislative laws that removed those tariffs, and later paid companies to move abroad.... well you and I know the final result.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffersonChick Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think it's a GREAT idea :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC