Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Free Ride for Oil Industry Appointees:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:05 PM
Original message
Obama's Free Ride for Oil Industry Appointees:
Obama’s free ride for oil industry appointees must stop

To shape the government's long-term response to the Gulf oil calamity, President Obama recently formed an independent, bipartisan commission to investigate the origins of the leak and BP's efforts to control it.
Yet one of the commission's two co-directors, former EPA chief William K. Reilly, sits on the board of directors of the oil giant ConocoPhillips and the chemical company Dupont, which supplies goods and services to the oil industry.

Now, Reilly is no doubt a relatively benevolent oilman. Grist contributor Osha Gray Davidson recently profiled him quite favorably on the El Phoenix Sun blog, portraying Reilly as a "bona fide environmentalist" whose Sonoma County home is powered by solar panels. According to Davidson, Reilly did good work at EPA under George H.W. Bush -- "until conservatives in the administration who had always seen Reilly (and all environmentalists) as a political liability" undermined him ahead of the 1992 election.
But the fact remains Reilly is literally on Big Oil's payroll. According to the PEU Report, Reilly brought home $246,515 in compensation from ConocoPhillips in 2009, and another $279,526 from Dupont. (Forbes has compensation numbers for previous years.) Reilly holds stock in the two multinationals valued at about $2 million apiece, PEU Report states.

ConcocoPhillips, it must be noted, has offshore-drilling projects lined up that will be affected by the commission's findings. Just after Obama announced his plan to dramatically expand offshore drilling in March -- before the Deepwater explosion -- the company was primed to move ahead with projects in Alaska's environmentally sensitive Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. "Our understanding is that today's announcement means exploration and development of existing Chukchi and Beaufort leases can proceed," a company spokesman told Reuters.

Reilly's conflict of interest in this case seems clear. Imagine the outrage if George W. Bush or a hypothetical President McCain had appointed a paid-up oilman, benevolent or not, to such a position. But Obama gets a free ride. Why?

Now, Reilly is not the first Obama appointee with direct ties to the oil industry. Indeed, two former BP execs now occupy high posts within, respectively, the Department of Energy and the Minerals Management Service. In March 2009, the president named BP's chief scientist, Steve Koonin, to the post of undersecretary of science to the Department of Energy. The pick drew little criticism within green circles at the time -- perhaps because at BP, Koonin's role was evidently to take the oil giant "beyond petroleum." As Koonin's DOE bio puts it:
At BP since 2004, Koonin was responsible for the long-range technology strategy of going 'beyond petroleum' to alternative and renewable energy sources, providing technical advice to senior executives, and managing in the firm's university-based research programs.
In retrospect, the lack of protest around the choice of Koonin seems foolish. Well before the calamity now transpiring in the Gulf, BP's "beyond petroleum" campaign was looking like a farce. Its pre-Deepwater Horizon safety record, for example, was much worse than that of its much-vilified rival Exxon. According to ABC News:

snip

For all we know, Koonin could well have been a progressive force within BP. Like Reilly, he seems like a relatively benevolent oilman. Still, he was the public face of a campaign that turned out to be a green gloss on a company whose long-term fortunes are clearly tied to petroleum drilling, processing, and vending. Why should we expect him to move the Department of Energy "beyond petroleum," when he so clearly failed to do so for BP?
Then there's Sylvia V. Baca, whom Obama tapped last summer to serve as deputy administrator for land and minerals management at the now-infamous Minerals Management Service. As Mother Jones' Kate Sheppard reported last week, Baca had spent her previous eight years as a BP exec. Kate points to Baca's official MMS bio:

Baca had been general manager for Social Investment Programs and Strategic Partnerships at BP America Inc. in Houston, and had held several senior management positions with the company since 2001, focusing on environmental initiatives, overseeing cooperative projects with private and public organizations, developing health, safety, and emergency response programs and working on climate change, biodiversity and sustainability objectives.
The bit about "health, safety, and emergency response programs" should give us pause. As noted above, BP has the worst safety record of any oil major operating in the United States. As for "emergency response," the company was woefully unprepared for a blowout at Deepwater, as evidenced by the experimental nature of its attempts to plug the leak -- and their repeated failures.

snip

http://www.grist.org/article/Obamas-free-ride-for-oil-industry-appointees-must-stop/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meet the new boss... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Same as the old boss...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not quite. The old boss faced low popularity
and constant marching in the streets over his corporate handouts. The new one has cheering in the streets, high polling numbers, and gives a damn fine speech before doing the same damn things.

I keep thinking I'll stop being shocked by the insane cheer leading, but I still am from time to time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. b/c our side "won," despite the hollowness of the "victory?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. cheering *in the streets*?
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 05:00 PM by Donnachaidh
back AWAY from the crack pipe.... :wow:

No argument on the speechifying -- he's the Democratic Party's Elmer Gantry... too bad it's *just* speechifying.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. ok, I guess streets was incorrect.
gathering in mass crowds at every speech and cheering though for sure. So much so that people will stand through downpours to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. incredible that Reilly sits on boards of ConocoPhillips and Dupont
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Really - who does Obama think he's kidding? Like nobody's going to report this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. now see i said virtuallythe same thing and i was called pathetic and my post was disappeared
...what will we be doing if this ends up in endless litigation like exxon-valdez? What will we be doing if this happens again, how will we develop the technology to stop these spills in 6 mos. if these oil cos. haven't done it in 30 years? What if this particular spill can't be stopped by late august..or xmas..or ever? How many species is it ok to destroy? Just cuz it's "our guy (s)?"

is it the planet..or is it endless growth for an already bloated plutarchy?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, I don't believe in giving "our guy" a free pass - transparency all the way...
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 07:39 PM by polichick
...and holding his feet to the fire when we need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. probably the latter, alas;
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 07:45 PM by amborin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. how is this commission "independent" when its co-directors sit on boards of Big Oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. K n R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. thanks! fairly shocking revelations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Beyond shocking, and disturbing and infuriating...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. thanks for rec'ing it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Washington commissions are where the truth goes to die.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. "Ken Salazar, corporatism and the BP oil spill"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. thanks for posting that! I hope you make it an OP! "appellate court overturned that 30 day"
alleged time period!

the whole thing stinks and needs lots of publicity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Sad. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Salazar
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. the article that Luminous Animal posted above is excellent,
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 07:54 PM by amborin
I hope it becomes an OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Done, amborin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC