Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:20 PM
Original message |
What does Bing offer that Google does not? |
|
Why should I pick a new search engine over the tried and true Google? What added value does it bring?
|
no limit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Why are you thinking of switching? |
|
I think google results beat anyone else's and I love the simple interface.
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. Just keeping an open mind. |
|
If something new is better, then I'll use it.
But I really don't see much value in having multiple search engines out there.
|
lazarus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I tried Bing a couple of times, can't stand it. Google does everything I need a search engine to do.
I've heard Bing is better for commercial searching, i.e. if you're shopping for something. I don't know, I don't do that sort of searching much.
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Really annoying pop-up windows? |
|
Other than that, Bing sucks.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
26. Honest to dog, I was reading about someone being beaten with belts by teachers in school and |
|
a window popped up on "Where to buy belts!"
|
ejpoeta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
4. annoying commercials? jk. well they are annoying. |
|
haven't really ventured. don't want to encourage the annoying commercials.
|
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I have found it to be far less comprehensive... |
|
but seems to have nice graphics on its home page... if that matters to anyone.
Google has lots of secondary search engines, like Google Scholar, etc. So, if I am doing general searching (rather than more targeted medical or technical academic searches)I really can't say why you'd not use Google.
|
JHB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
6. A classic croon of "White Christmas"? |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
mikelgb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message |
7. it has a background image, how exciting |
BR_Parkway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Their mapping is superior - both in high quality imaging and their |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 02:25 PM by BR_Parkway
zooming in that morphs right into "street view" with more controls about how to move around and see things from different angles. They also incorporate Photosynth, that program that matches up various photos that it finds on the internet into 3D imagery.
For everything else, there's Google - but I have to say Bing has got this one part down perfectly
|
Lance_Boyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A legendary crooner who shares the name? Apparently MS thinks Bing's big thing is that it tells vampires where to have dinner. Personally, I like to peruse the links and make my own decision, but I guess there's room for a search Engine that picks restaurants for you...
|
NoNothing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Bing maps is better than google maps |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 02:25 PM by NoNothing
If you have Silverlight installed.
EDIT: And they don't have street view but they do have better overhead views.
|
metapunditedgy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
18. Bing maps is crap for me, and I can't stand silverlight, but maybe it just doesn't |
Codeine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
11. There is absolutely no reason to use anything but Google. |
|
Like 'em or loathe 'em as a company, they know search engine technology in a way that nobody else does.
|
louis-t
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Hate the search engine, love the maps. |
athenasatanjesus
(592 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Competition just in case google ever turns evil nt. |
Oregone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
zipplewrath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The have a travel search engine that isn't bad for looking for flights and the like.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
17. google....bing is`t all that great. |
Raster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
19. bing = mediocre search engine from a company in decline |
The Straight Story
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I use both and wolfram, why use only one? (nt) |
JBoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Just like Chandler Bing. A third nipple. |
Statistical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Bing maps is good but the search engine ... meh. |
|
I actually forced myself to use bing first for about a week.
Wanted to see if I like google just because I am use it and not because of the actual results.
Nope. google has far superior results. Even giving bing "first chance" google still wins.
|
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Nothing that I can see |
|
I do a lot of searching, so after all the hype, I tried Bing -- I find it very confusing and not really helpful.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
24. A bad search engine. nt |
BadgerKid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
25. As an original seeder of Google |
|
I welcome the alternatives. Over the last few years it's been very hard to search for time-sensitive information, but if I want encyclopedic-type information, Google is very nice.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Because you love having some mechanical. electronical thingy pick your result for you? |
|
Sorry, not much help, I know, but it's all I've got.
|
lpbk2713
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Ballmer will come to your house and lick your feet. |
MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Tweedle-dum, tweedle-dee |
|
My business is creating web content, and incorporating SEO subtly into that content. So I spend a lot of time checking search engine results. What works for Google works for Bing. More people use Google, so all of my SEO efforts go toward Google results. Essentially, the results on Bing are virtually identical.
Use whichever one you prefer. There's precious little difference in most searches.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Let me Google that for you... |
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Well, Bing does have Ned Ryerson as a spokersperson, so they've got that going for them. |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 04:31 PM by Uncle Joe
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. what language are those subtitles in |
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
36. Honestly, I don't know, sometimes it's English but then it switches to something else, |
|
sort of like Bush the Least.
|
frebrd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
33. It offers a chance to..... |
|
help fill Micro$oft's coffers.
:)
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
34. a very pretty background |
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
37. Tried Bing once. Hated it. |
|
I prefer search engines to be simple and not use an awful algorithm to figure out what I'm looking for. It's also pretty easy to refine your search to filter out the junk.
|
Common Sense Party
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Not a thing, as far as I can tell, other than a big pretty picture |
|
that takes far too long to load.
I tried it for a week, and went back to Google.
I used to use Yahoo years ago, but Google gets me what I need, fast.
|
Goblinmonger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
39. A reminder that Google is kicking Microsoft's ass. |
|
Actually that game is over and Google has won. Just waiting for the final act.
|
spinbaby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
40. My vote for worst search engine is Yippy |
|
It promises to censor your search results including "Anti-Christian views or opinions" and "Anti-Conservative views or opinions."
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
41. Pure frustration and nothing you're looking for. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |