Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Progressives criticize White House, Democrats - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:04 PM
Original message
Progressives criticize White House, Democrats - AP
Ignore, ridicule, or chastise the Left at your peril.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100607/ap_on_el_ge/us_progressives_democrats

WASHINGTON – Progressive activists who helped elect Barack Obama president complained on Monday that the administration and congressional Democrats have been too timid and too willing to compromise.

Even though Obama's major first-term achievement — an overhaul of the nation's health care system — passed without a single Republican vote, progressive leaders who gathered in Washington criticized the president for failing to create a government-run insurance option to compete with private industry.

They faulted Obama for the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the slow pace in repealing the ban on gays serving in the military and last year's economic stimulus package, which they described as inadequate at $787 billion. They also criticized his handling of the Gulf oil spill.

Democrats already face an angry electorate this November. The frustration among the party's liberal base could make the midterm elections even more difficult for Democrats and Obama's own re-election bid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they lose in November...
...it will be because "the base" feels like they have been duped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Odds are they will lose in November. The passion is gone
I'm not writing a single check and not making a single call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. The media doesn't give a shit about progressives, and the GOP
have their own problems: NRCC recruits face added scrutiny after string of losses.

I love the dog whistle in the OP article:

Even though Obama's major first-term achievement — an overhaul of the nation's health care system — passed without a single Republican vote, progressive leaders who gathered in Washington criticized the president for failing to create a government-run insurance option to compete with private industry.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. Dog whistle? Progressives did not support the Health
Insurance bail-out while handing over more public funds to private insurance. There was no reform, we still have a for-profit health insurance system. The only real reform was saving that corrupt industry from going out of business. A real progressive majority would have not only let them fail, they would have helped out the door.

Did you really think people were going to forget that whole debacle? Did the WH think that? How they excluded the base from the whole process while allowing the corrupt insurance industry to basically write the bill?

If Democrats lose in November it will be their own fault. When a party insults its base over and over again, this is what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. They WANT Dems to lose seats in November. Would make their lives a WHOLE lot easier.
Then they can pass their right-wing, corporate agenda because they are "forced" to. They can be the good guys, keep their cush jobs, not be expected to fight the military industrial complex or disaster capitalists, and act like they're fighting the good fight.

Why in the world would Obama and the other corporate Dems want to gain seats this fall? So they can make their lives harder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. If they lose there is no base.
All there will be are Democrats who got duped by "the base".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. It'll Be Link . .
"Can you hear us now?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, progressives get thrown under the bus once the election is over
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. The media suck
Although leaders still spoke with admiration for Obama, it was clear he's not as popular with unions, bloggers and other progressives.

Democrats already face an angry electorate this November. The frustration among the party's liberal base could make the midterm elections even more difficult for Democrats and Obama's own re-election bid.

Although no one seriously suggested a primary challenge to Obama, activists said they would take on congressional incumbents and they cited Arkansas, where the Progressive Congressional Campaign Committee has sent $250,000 to Lt. Gov. Bill Halter's bid against Sen. Blanche Lincoln, which will be decided in a runoff Tuesday.


Also when the hell did Arianna Huffington become a progressive?

"It's clear that hope is not enough," said Arianna Huffington, the founder of the online Huffington Post. "We need Hope 2.0."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Before Obama, who has yet to become a progressive and shows no sign of doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sorry
I just don't buy that

President Obama might not be the perfect progressive, but to pretend that nothing has changed doesn't take his achievements into account.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Oh things have changed...
...for the worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. "...for the worse."
Bring back Bush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Yeah, that's exactly what I said.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. you massively contradict yourself
Edited on Mon Jun-07-10 05:49 PM by William Z. Foster
All day long you aggressively argue against A,B,C and D in the most hostile and relentless fashion imaginable.

Then when people say they are unhappy with the administration for not doing A,B,C, and D, you claim that the administration DID do A,B,C, and D and that this is why you "support the administration."

Which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes. Interesting she was considered progressive under *. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
42. I bet you LOOOOOOVED Arianna when HuffPo was a shamelessly pro-Obama tabloid during the primaries
My how times change. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. History is repeating itself
Unless Obama turns to the left the way that FDR did, then both parties will continue to turn to the right. With a rightward march meaning a march toward luancy and then irrelevancy for the GOP, they will disappear as anything but a minor local party within a decade. With no alternative left for progressives, they will likely to split to form their new party.

Unfortunately, those new parties are small and ripe for takeover by the Hamiltonians as soon as their stated purpose has been achieved and the left slides into apathy and complacency.

Nothing can stop the progression but a leftward turn by the Democrats and I honestly don't think Obama is capable of doing that. I know Congress isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Time for the really really progressive candidate to stand up

and challenge the corporate congress. We might not know who that is yet, but I'm putting it out there that the right person will appear for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Not from within the Democratic Party.
"Progressive" Democrats are excluded from the Party Leadership who will use the Party Apparatus to crush "Progressive" challengers.

At the very best, you will be given a choice between:

a)A Pro-WAR, Anti-LABOR, Free Trading, Big Corpo Democrat...

OR

b)A different Pro-WAR, Anti-LABOR, Free Trading, Big Corpo Democrat


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Yes, I agree. It will never be a known Dem.

It has to be a new breed, yes a Liberal, yes an anti-war progressive. But no known run of the mill Democrat from the ranks of the Dems, Inc. we have known so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Scary
Anybody know President Obama's approval numbers amongst Democrats? 20%? 30%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. I get it now, Obama is so bad that we need to put Repubs in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Fail
DLC really needs some new talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Who really judges what is fail and what isn't? You replied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. That line doesn't work anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Never did. "You don't like a Dem who acts like a repug, therefore you must want
a repug instead of the Dem who acts like one." Uh huh. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
39. the differences are superficial at best.
lots of window dressing, not much change. and bush and cheney are still free men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. They are just figuring this out now?
Our media sucks so fucking bad when this can be a news story. We have been pissed for a long time now and have made that anger very clear, I guess as long as you dont belong to a far right fringe movement then what you have to say isn't important or news worthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well, we don't go out waving misspelled, racist signs.
That must be our problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orlandodem Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. I hope unions tell Obama that unless he pays attention, there will be no
endorsement, money, or foot soldiers for the GOTV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Dude you think he doesnt already know this?
Him and his administration have gone after the left at every chance they have had. If its one thing Obama has made clear its that he does not give a shit about the democratic activist base. Its sad, but its like he is purposefully attempting to marginalize and piss off his base while angering the other base as much as he can making them more motivated.

I just dont think he understands that he was not voted into office as a member of some non-existent centrist party, he was voted in as a democrat and in order to win elections and get anything done you have to have the support of the people who fucking voted for you. Its like he thinks he can piss off both sides of the political spectrum and just hang out in the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. !

Fuck the Democratic Wing.
What are they going to do?
Vote for a Republican?
Hahahahahahahahahaha!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. That's exactly what he thinks.
It seemed to work for Clinton.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. knr. glad to see it in print.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. I love how the media is calling the health-insurance scam an "overhaul"
as if its something progressives are as stupid as the media are to believe it's "change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
40. no, no...the media said it's "overhaul", so it must be. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. irony
Saying that Democratic party politicians "have been too timid and too willing to compromise" is an extremely compromising and timid statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. How do they know they could have done anything without compromise?
Why do they think their hard line would have achieved anything at all?

Even Sanders and Feingold voted with the POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
38. The Democratic leadership..
has known this for some time. They really don't give a shit - which begs the question... why?? It seems the only rational explanation is to afford them some political "cover" for their right-leaning legislation. Huge majorities in both houses have seemed more like a bourdon than a welcomed tool( go figure). The corporate media will help them out with the false meme that the people have pushed back on this administrations far left agenda (lol) rather than the reality that they are loosing the base. And the facade of democracy will continue until enough people wake up from their slumber - I only hope that it isn't too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
41. Major first-term achievement?
Bwa, ha ha ha ha ha. ROFLMAO. You couldn't make this stuff up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
43. The shock!! The horror!! NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
45. Damn right.
Our party has been shanghaied by a bunch of rapublican shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC