Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Told ya Tom Vilsack, “Biotech Governor of the Year” would be bad news.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:07 PM
Original message
Told ya Tom Vilsack, “Biotech Governor of the Year” would be bad news.
http://healthfreedoms.org/2010/06/02/obamas-usda-to-deceive-americans-over-gm-crops/

Obama’s USDA to deceive Americans over GM crops

Don’t believe Monsanto’s green-washing. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), aren’t meant to feed the world or survive the evermore frequent droughts and floods brought on by global warming – they’re designed to sell Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup and the patented “Roundup Ready” genes now spliced into millions of acres of corn, cotton, soy, canola, sugar beets and alfalfa. A 2009 study showed that, in 13 years, Roundup Ready crops increased herbicide use by 383 million pounds. During the Bush administration, the movement to stop GMOs was making progress. Reflecting public concern over GMOs, in 2007, a Federal court ruled that the Bush USDA’s approval of Roundup Ready alfalfa violated the law because it failed to analyze risks such as the contamination of conventional and organic alfalfa and the development of “super-weeds.” The court banned the planting of GM alfalfa until USDA completed a rigorous analysis of these impacts. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals twice affirmed the national ban on Roundup Ready alfalfa planting, but Monsanto is appealing. They’re taking organic alfalfa farmers all the way to the Supreme Court!

<snip>

Barack Obama, despite promising us “change we can believe in,” is unfortunately turning out to be just as pro-GMO as the preceding Bush and Clinton administrations, packing the USDA and other government bureaucracies with Monsanto men and biotech cheerleaders such as former Iowa Governor, Tom Vilsack, named “Biotech Governor of the Year” in 2001, now serving as USDA Secretary. Vilsack, notorious for flying around in a Monsanto company jet during one of his previous election campaigns, is now busy trying to get the court-ordered ban on Roundup Ready alfalfa lifted by issuing a new draft environmental impact statement (EIS) that denies or downplays the obvious environmental and human health hazards of GM alfalfa.

Alfalfa is the fourth most widely grown crop in the U.S. and a key source of dairy forage and hay. The first perennial crop to be genetically engineered, GM alfalfa can regenerate itself from its root-stock. It is open-pollinated by bees, which can cross-pollinate at distances of several miles, spreading Monsanto’s patented, foreign DNA to non-GMO and organic crops. Widespread GMO-contamination of organic alfalfa is inevitable if the Obama Administration successfully distorts science and ignores public opinion and allows Monsanto’s GM Roundup Ready alfalfa to be planted across the U.S.

Mounting evidence shows damage to animals and humans from unlabeled and untested Frankenfoods. Consumers who ingest GM alfalfa are likely risking their health; since even the USDA’s EIS admits that, “acute toxicity in mice was observed.”

According to the EIS, consumers who ingest foods with residues of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide may experience “general and non-specific signs of toxicity from subchronic and chronic exposure to glyphosate includ changes in liver weight, blood chemistry (may suggest mild liver toxicity), liver pathology, and weight of the pituitary gland.”

.more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. So let me see if I've got this straight.
Monsanto wanted to release their new GM alfalfa without an environmental impact statement.

They were blocked by the court, until they got their environmental impact statement.

They went through the environmental impact statement process.

It was cleared and approved for use.

And I'm supposed to hate Obama why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. BP had an 'oil spill recovery plan' approved too..how's that working out for us?
I don't see anything in the OP about hating Obama.
I like frogs. The Roundup is killing frogs.
Just another example of corporate greed throwing caution to the wind.
Thanks to the OP for bringing this issue up. It doesn't get any airtime on TV because Monsanto is very powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Chernobyl, therefore accidentally the whole thing.
"I don't see anything in the OP about hating Obama. "

Oh, sure you didn't. Uh huh.

"I like frogs. The Roundup is killing frogs. "

No it's not.

"Thanks to the OP for bringing this issue up."

Thanks, OP, for linking to a sight that warns us of the dangers of childhood vaccines and dental x-rays. If I dig deeper will I find out about fluoride and chemtrails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you are very welcome nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It turns out the answer's 'yes.'
Your site carries much information on the "dangers" of fluoride and chemtrails. Haven't searched for loch ness monsters or joos yet, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. good for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And some for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. point taken
not an unbiased source.

Very basically, it says the Obama admin. worked to help Monsanto get the court ban lifted.
Is that correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. From a guy who didn't know that the Bohr model..
is just an approximation.

Your scientific opinion carries no weight with me, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Um, what?
You seem to be remembering a conversation that I never had.

I've never said the Bohr model was more than an approximation. I've probably said that the Bohr model is wrong. Which it is. Is that the source of your problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh, really?
Edited on Mon Jun-07-10 10:00 PM by girl gone mad
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6817143&mesg_id=6817299

Me: "no prediction of quantum mechanics has ever been shown to be wrong."

You: "I don't think that's entirely true.

Take the Bohr model of the atom, for example.
"

:rofl: :rofl:

Um, duh. The Bohr model is not a prediction of quantum mechanics.

I know you like to weigh in on all things science, calling other DUers "woo-woos" and what not. Maybe you could take some time out of your prolific kvetching about how dumb and useless other DU posters are and, like, read a textbook, or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You don't consider the Bohr model to be quantum mechanics?
So is it classical physics, or relativity? Thermodynamics maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Roundup with atrazine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. "linking to a 'sight'" sic it's "site" and not "sight"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Because of the irreversible mutations this will further cause to planetary life forms
Edited on Tue Jun-08-10 05:39 AM by SpiralHawk
Corporopersons luv them their mutant life forms.

Human beings not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC