Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil-Coated Gulf Birds Better Off Dead? -- National Geographic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:11 PM
Original message
Oil-Coated Gulf Birds Better Off Dead? -- National Geographic
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 09:15 PM by nashville_brook
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/06/100608-gulf-oil-spill-birds-science-environment/


Oil-Coated Gulf Birds Better Off Dead?
Kill or clean? Either way, the birds may face stormy skies.




Since late last week a flood of pictures of oil-coated Gulf of Mexico birds—and conservationists painstakingly cleaning them—has added new emotional impact to the BP oil spill. Some experts—citing traditionally low survival rates for rescued birds—are controversially arguing it would be better to immediately and humanely kill the suffering birds.

In a Spiegel Online article last month, German biologist Silvia Gaus argued that workers helping birds caught in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, should "kill, not clean." Gaus said studies show that more than 99 percent of rehabilitated birds will die anyway as a result of oil exposure, mainly due to kidney and liver damage caused by oil ingestion.

(snip)

"If the rehabbers can convince me that 25-50 percent are going to be successfully cleaned and released back into the environment and not die subsequently and painfully from the oil they have ingested, then OK, let's give it a try," said Remsen, ornithologist and professor at the Louisiana State Department of Biological Sciences in Baton Rouge.

But, he said, "emotionally painful as it is, I would be for euthanizing those birds if it can be shown that the probability of them being successfully rehabbed is low."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Omg - I can't take it.
:cry: :cry: :cry: I keep telling myself that I will not click on these threads because they upset me so much, but I still do :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another thing... Where are they supposed to go back to?
Their habitat has been destroyed. You could release them in a similar habitat not yet affected by the oil disaster, but the way this is going, the crude oil will eventually reach their new home, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC