Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South Carolina Democratic Primary: It's irrelevant if he was a plant or not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:43 PM
Original message
South Carolina Democratic Primary: It's irrelevant if he was a plant or not
The conspiracy theorists have come out to claim that Alvin Greene is a Republican Plant.
Let's say he was a Republican Plant -- so what?

The man didn't campaign, he did no fund raising, had no website -- He did NOTHING to try and win and yet he won

If this was a sneaky attempt by the Republicans to sneak in a ringer it has to be the worst attempt in history because no effort was made by Alvin Greene to get elected

Alvin Greene got 59% of the vote running against a former four-term state lawmaker.

The response from the South Carolina Democratic Party is he probably won because his name was first on the ballot
That speaks to a few serious and troubling questions
1. Do you really believe that a four term state rep lost because his name didn't come first on the ballot? (People know who the guy the Party is backing and they still didn't vote for him)

2. 59% to 41% is a rather large margin of victory for a guy who made no effort to get elected. What kind of analysis is the Party doing about their endorsement process? (Because it sounds like you endorsed an extremely weak candidate)

3. You want Mr Greene to withdraw from the race. Why should he? (He won) and If he did, who is the person you would be looking to, to run for that seat? (I hope you're not thinking of the guy who finished a distant second.)

I understand it is very difficult to be a Democrat running for a federal office or state-wide office in South Carolina and you do have my sympathies.
I am not knocking South Carolina because there are some very good Democrats in the state.
But the issue is not Alvin Greene and his election.
It shouldn't be "Was he a Republican plant?" because the guy won big by doing nothing

I hope the issue is "What can the Party do to get back into the game in South Carolina?"

I wish all the Democrats in South Carolina nothing but the best come November.
I will donate to the nominee for Governor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. From what I've seen he seems like a dumb fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Then agin, DeMint ain't zactly no Einstein nither
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. They don't call him Dimwit for nothing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. felony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. On that level it is an issue I agree
But there are people who are all worked up about him being a plant by the Republicans and they're trying to subvert the Democratic Primary.
I just don't see it with this guy -- He made zero effort to get elected
WTF pays 100000 to some guy to run for office who makes no effort?

That makes zero sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. According to the DU rules, we're now obligated to support him.
Or so I was told when I pointed out Blanche Lincoln's obvious theft the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Going to be interesting if Jeb Bush converts to a dem and runs for office
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Don't give him (or the DLC) any ideas!
It's bad enough the DLC'ers on this board are treating Crist like a "Democrat" and openly shilling for him over the actual Democrat in the race (kinda like they did in the Connecticut Senate race of 2006.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Uh oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Be sure to vote in my poll on this topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Yikes!
Edited on Fri Jun-11-10 01:26 AM by Rhiannon12866
Looks like you're on the "naughty" list, too... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two words: Open Primary...
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 10:47 PM by hlthe2b
This is what happens when Rethugs can cross over to choose the Dem's candidate.

I fear California may suddenly wake up to this fact after passing their own ballot initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. How do the ballots work in SC?
Can a voter pick a Democrat in Race A, and a Rethuglican in Race B?

As I understand it, someone picks either a Democratic ballot or a Republican one, and their choices are limited to the candidates filing with those parties.

Yes, Jim DeMint was a shoo-in for the Repuke nomination in SC, but I would imagine that a GOP'er would not want to have given up the chance to vote for that party's nominee for governor in a very heated race. To believe that they would just to put Greene in as opposition to a man who's pretty much got the job in November strains credibility.

Of course, if you can pick and choose all around the ballot (like I could in Washington State some many years ago), then you have a point. But I seem to recall that the SCOTUS made such ballots illegal quite some time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. 1. The man is barely literate. This is a sham
I wish him no will ill - I am more sickened that he was duped into doing this.

2. He ran on $500 vs the $250,000 warchest of his dem competitor. (See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4422179)

I ain't buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think most of you are missing the real problem. IF his
filing fee of $10,000 was paid for by someone else, THAT'S A FELONY! It's called interfering with the voting process. I suppose it's unfair of me to make an assupmtion, but I'm going to assume that Mr Greene does NOT have a spare $10,000 of disposable income to have paid his filig fee to run for the office. That means someone else did! On another post Isaid I hope an investigation proves that DiMine's crowd gave him the $$! Can Greene be a good Senator in the event DiMint crashes & burns? Hmmmm, probably not, but if he were elected, & if he hired some GOOD advisors, he COULD prove to be a much better Senator fr the US than DiMint could ever be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. And that is a valid point I don't disagree
But, there seems to be a lot of effort being expended my many people about this guy being a plant by the Republican Party.

Something like this would have been coordinated through DeMint's office and I find it hard to believe that DeMint would give 10,000 dollars to this guy. Have him put his name on the primary ballot. Then sit in his parent's basement for last few months and do nothing.

All in the hope that this guy would win the Democratic Primary by doing jack and squat

Where he got the money is valid question (I will admit I missed your post and if you would link it for me I'd be glad to read it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Exactly.
Why piss away 10 grand and not have your plant campaign?

That strategy makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. A real (and surprising) lack of imagination here, it seems.. here
given how many dirty tricks we've seen from Rethugs over the years. Why WOULD they want this guy to campaign? They wouldn't. He's an idiot. They would be 1. depending on the lack of name recognition to luck out with him being elected OR if there is a conspiracy 2. counting on enough cross over RETHUG votes to get him elected in an open primary

As to the earlier post that "it would have to be coordinated through DeMint's office and why would he..." That is absolute nonsense. Have some DUers not heard of the many RW groups working behind the scenes to fund such efforts? THe Grover Norquists, Krolls, the Richard Mellon Scaifes, the Peter Thiels-- all that have been found to fund these kind of campaigns, from the little dweeb James O'Keefe's anti-acorn crap, to the swift boaters. These were the kind of tactics Karl Rove brought to local campaigns and then to a national level.

No, I don't think it unlikely, at all.... And yes, this guy may be a sad "mark," but if he took this money from someone who is exploiting him, he could be guilty of a felony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unrec for unitelligent audacity and lack
Of serious info backing up said unintelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You have a nice day too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. who believes ANY dem was gonna unseat deMint? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Having lived in SC for 6 years I'd agree with you, BUT...
remember Ann Richards, Governor of Texas! Texas is almsot as tie with SC in "conservatives, RWers, etc.) but they LOVED ANN! The right person could do it. I KNOW FOr SUre though, they would NOt have just sat quietly and did nothing! They would have campaigned HARD and raised lots of $$ and it would have been on the national scene for months!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. If he is legitimate, it would be nice to think that the anti-incumbent fervor
Stirred up by the Republicans for their Tea Party crowd could come back to bite them! Wouldn't it be sweet if Greene beat DeMint?

I wonder if he got so many votes because the voters were tired of the same choices? Greene's competition in the Demoncratic race was a long time Party guy.

But when my tin foil hat leaks I wonder about how Greene got such and overwhelming victory with no campaigning - and wonder if this is some test of voting machine manipulation that was not supposed to attract attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. I hate conspiracy theories. But the SC Republicans have run a decoy candidate before.
Here:

Greene’s curious candidacy raises the question that something else might be going on.
Republican place markers in Palmetto State Democratic primaries are campaign legend.

In the early ‘90s, a Republican strategist was prosecuted and forced to pay a fine when he was found to have coaxed an unemployed black fisherman into running in a primary race to increase white turnout at the polls in a Lowcountry congressional race. The political operative paid the man’s filing fee.

http://www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1992912064017974&ShowArticle_ID=11011905102861700

But it seems to me the only upside would be to embarrass the Dems. DeMint was going to win anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. Isn't it possible that he didn't win?
I am inclined to believe voting machine error before I believe the plant theory.

The GOP has no reason to run a decoy or plant in that race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. I think that it is interesting that this angle isn't being
questioned. Maybe it is a test run to see just how ridiculous a result will be accepted before they really screw the pooch with the Nov. elections. we are seriously f**ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC