Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Externalized costs and corporate greed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 05:37 AM
Original message
Externalized costs and corporate greed
Destroyed by the BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, costs which won't be compensated:

Increased costs to consumers -- for seafood, possibly crops, and anything shipped through the Gulf
Real estate values impacted
Health costs to humans for decades to come -- from toxic residues in seafood, fumes, air pollution, and emotional stress
Cost of fresh water on Florida's West Coast
Quality of life
Way of life lost for many families

Regarding the costs that they supposedly will have to reimburse -- such as lost income for fishermen -- will that be for one year, five years, 20 years? Will it include the losses of all downstream businesses, like the truckers the carry the fish or the diner that cooks for the fishermen? There will be no penny assigned for the loss of the pelicans or the small fishes who die at sea.

In corporate executive suites:
Caution is underappreciated
Humility is not valued
Concern for externalized costs is undesirable
A certain amount of arrogance and hubris are career assets

Several people in real life continue to mention that nuclear power is the solution, which I find absurd. Tony Hayward's twin or Ken Lay's twin will end up in the top job someday, and the TV 'news' will have more tragedy to cover. Not every CEO or top executive is unethical or incompetent, but there is constant pressure on the decision process in executive row to deliver profits in the short term at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nuclear?
Actually when they say nuclear just read that as centralized. Whether it be continued use of oil, natural gas, clean coal (whatever that is) or nuclear the corporate types are always going to support the solution that centralizes the control of power generation. How else are they going to be able to gouge us on a continuing basis for our power. If everybody got into solar and wind power generation at the local and individual level they would lose control of their cash cow or at least have their profits greatly reduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with your characterization. Centralized vs dispersed is something that
is good to focus on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC