Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Michael Boomberg Hearts BP..."They didn't exactly go down there and blow up the well"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 01:54 PM
Original message
Breaking: Michael Boomberg Hearts BP..."They didn't exactly go down there and blow up the well"
Jason Linkins
jason@huffingtonpost.com | HuffPost Reporting

Michael Bloomberg: Leave BP Alone!

First Posted: 06-11-10 12:38 PM | Updated: 06-11-10 12:40 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/11/michael-bloomberg-leave-b_n_609120.html



New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, of the Bloomberg Bloombergs, thinks that everyone is being unnecessarily hard on BP, and hopes that we can all avoid a "rush to judgment." Per the New York Post:

The billionaire former CEO mayor is known for defending private businesses dealing with public relations problems. Friday was no different.

Bloomberg said on his weekly radio show that the head of British Petroleum "didn't exactly go down there and blow up the well."


Oh, well! Could the zero people who are out there, promoting the idea that BP CEO Tony Hayward went down to the Deepwater Horizon oil rig to personally blow it up kindly shut up?

Additionally, Bloomberg is said to have opined that "everyone might want to wait to assign blame because the expertise of BP is needed to fix the problem." And you know, I get that we're stuck in the Codependency Tango with the oil company, I just think it would be great if BP could stop demonstrating their "expertise" in clamping down on media coverage.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's a heartless rich guy
And he's wrong. Criminal negligence would indicate that is exactly what BP did do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. he needs to stfu. of course they did, with their shortcuts and their
Edited on Sat Jun-12-10 12:24 AM by roguevalley
greed and their lies. they blew it the hell up because they fantasized, as masters of the universe, that they could control reality. FUCK HIM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. The billionaire king of New York likes BP? I'm shocked.
Let's see one tarball on one inch of property he owns. Then we'll talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bloomberg/Paul in 2012 - Apologists for Megacorporations
Between "accidents happen" Rand Paul and this ego-centric jerk they can collect quite a bit of corporate money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Vet Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hes delusional................
Bring his ass down to the gulf. And explain to all the people how we should be nice-nice to BP for low balling how fucked they are. Also how the eco-system will be pretty much GONE around 2030. I don't think people can get there hands around the how terrible this really is, Anyone defending BP is an idiot, Period
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. A building collapses in Manhattan...
...turns out the powerful and politically-influential construction company had falsified emergency-escape and fire-control plans and deliberately used sub-standard concrete, steel, and rebar to save money.

But, hey, it's not like they DELIBERATELY planted blasting charges and lit the fuse, right?

Oopsie, big accident, nobody's at fault, move along people, nothing to see here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. ahh thimble brain speaks.
hey, bloomy STF up. Go back to destroying NYC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. People who leave a loaded gun
sitting on a coffee table probably don't want their kids to shoot each other either, but when it happens the parents are accused of negligence.

I highly doubt BP wanted the rig to blow up but that's really not the point. It happened and from what I can piece together it happened because they don't like playing by the rules. Whether or not they blew up the well themselves or it happened out of negligence, the well blew up. The end result is the same. BP and all the other players in this disaster, like TransOcean and Halliburton, are responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey Bloomberg..how are the Walrus's and Sea Lions in the Gulf doing?
they lied in reports to our government and gave a false report to our government officials..isn't that illegal??????????????

PSSSSSSS..in case you don't know Bloomy..there are no Walrus's or Sea Lions as were in BP's spill plans, in the Gulf of Mexico..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. They didn't have to. Their negligence did the trick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fuck Bloomberg. Must be upset about the stock price. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. No but they did cut costs by not installing a $500,000 devise that other countries
require:


"The Deepwater rig lacked a remote-control shut-off switch, a back-up system that would close the well even if the rig above was destroyed.-snip The oil companies complained that the $500,000 devices were too expensive. Keep in mind the Deepwater was a $560 million rig. Countries like Norway and Brazil require these precautions to avert catastrophe, but in the US the technology is voluntary. This is thanks to a 2003 decision by the Bush administration's Minerals Management Service (MMS)"


http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2010/05/bp-getting-heat-gulf-disaster

and they did use a toxic dispersant banned in the UK!

bloomberg is an asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. And even if BP had done EXACTLY that
Bloomberg would still let them off the hook. Professional courtesy and all that amongst the Wreckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. That sounds exactly like some of the posts I've read here.
Birds of a feather...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC