Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fixing Fannie+Freddie Mac to cost 1 trillion?!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:31 AM
Original message
Fixing Fannie+Freddie Mac to cost 1 trillion?!?!?
Fannie-Freddie Fix at $160 Billion With $1 Trillion Worst Case

By Lorraine Woellert and John Gittelsohn


June 14 (Bloomberg) -- The cost of fixing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage companies that last year bought or guaranteed three-quarters of all U.S. home loans, will be at least $160 billion and could grow to as much as $1 trillion after the biggest bailout in American history.

Fannie and Freddie, now 80 percent owned by U.S. taxpayers, already have drawn $145 billion from an unlimited line of government credit granted to ensure that home buyers can get loans while the private housing-finance industry is moribund. That surpasses the amount spent on rescues of American International Group Inc., General Motors Co. or Citigroup Inc., which have begun repaying their debts.

“It is the mother of all bailouts,” said Edward Pinto, a former chief credit officer at Fannie Mae, who is now a consultant to the mortgage-finance industry.

Fannie, based in Washington, and Freddie in McLean, Virginia, own or guarantee 53 percent of the nation’s $10.7 trillion in residential mortgages, according to a June 10 Federal Reserve report. Millions of bad loans issued during the housing bubble remain on their books, and delinquencies continue to rise. How deep in the hole Fannie and Freddie go depends on unemployment, interest rates and other drivers of home prices, according to the companies and economists who study them.

more

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=an_hcY9YaJas&pos=10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveVictory Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. wow, just wow.
We need to do something about these companies I guess. This is getting out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. uhhh, the loans are already made
and have already gone bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveVictory Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. you are right, but we need to stop using them so the future damages we have to pay
Is minimal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fannie & Freddy needs to be slowly unwound.
Edited on Mon Jun-14-10 10:01 AM by Statistical
No new "exotic loans" If banks want to issue a mortgage they should be required to keep it on their own books.
Fannie & Freddy have essentially been a dumping pound for mortgages. Banks get all the profits, F&F get all the risk.

So nothing drastic, existing loans should be held until maturity (and or default :( ) however F&F should wind down the loans they have on books and reduce the loans they will accept over next couple years.

Eventually F&F should only handle FHA loans with strict underwriting guidelines and only 2 options: 30 year fixed or 15 year fixed. Period.

No option loans, no jumbo loans, no interest only loans, no option-ARM, no x year ARM, no balloon loans, no reverse amortization loans.

15 year fixed or 30 year fixed
strict underwriting requirements
strict limits on loan to value
strict guidelines on home appraisals
5% down-payment
FHA only

Within a generation F&F will be 1/10th their current size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveVictory Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pisses me off to no end.
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 02:20 PM by SlipperySlope
Fannie and Freddie debt, **by definition** was not backed by the United States government. Investors who bought Fannie and Freddie debt were explicitly accepting the risk of default *and* were being paid an interest premium for that risk.

But as soon as the fat cats face a loss, BOOM, the government decides to bail them out and put all that loss onto the taxpayer instead.

Fannie and Freddie are time bombs waiting to go off. It could end up costing the taxpayer over $1 trillion - cost that was supposed to be born by the BONDHOLDERS who bought these things, accepted the risk, and were paid a premium for that risk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC