Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pope says pro-choice lawmakers should be denied sacraments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 08:53 PM
Original message
Pope says pro-choice lawmakers should be denied sacraments
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/17202252.htm

Pope says pro-choice lawmakers should be denied sacraments
By Jack Chang
McClatchy Newspapers

SAO PAULO, Brazil - Pope Benedict XVI kicked off a historic five-day visit to Brazil on Wednesday by sending a tough anti-abortion message that sparked a hemisphere-wide debate over the Roman Catholic Church's efforts to influence politicians.

In answer to a question about Mexico City's recent legalization of abortion, Benedict indicated that he would support Mexican bishops if they were to decide to excommunicate lawmakers who voted for the law.

"It is part of the code," Benedict said, according to reporters aboard the plane. "It is based simply on the principle that the killing of an innocent human child is incompatible with going in communion with the body of Christ."

The Vatican quickly clarified the pope's remarks, saying that he may have inferred from the question that Mexico's bishops had already taken action against the lawmakers, which they hadn't.

But the seeming support for excommunicating Catholic politicians who buck the church on abortion overshadowed Benedict's arrival in Sao Paulo on his first trip outside Europe since he became pope in 2005.

Benedict wasted no time in returning to the abortion issue after arriving at Sao Paulo's Guarulhos International Airport, where he was greeted by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and other officials.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sinead O'Connor was right
...even if she was talking about the last one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. a visual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. If he's talking laws/lawmakers, they should lose their tax exempt status. Just talking about
abortion is one thing, but getting involved in our legal process about it is another. If he gets threatened with that, you'll see how fast he shuts the fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. So says the hypocritical, Nazi Youth pope.
What an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck a bunch of popes
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. The sooner the Catholic Church dies, the better, as far as I'm concerned.
I didn't used to feel that way, but Pope Ratzo has brought me around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. Oh boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. I'm not okay with the Catholic church as currently constituted
where the Vatican is trying to dictate the politics of presumably sovereign nations. Out here in my neck of the woods, Terry McAuliffe was prohibited from giving an address at his own alma mater (to which he has contributed loads of money) simply because he has stated in the past that he is pro-choice on abortion. There's been alot of this sort of activity in this country lately. The church seems to be trying to bring back to good old days from before the Reformation, when they were the supreme political force over states that were not really sovereign.

If that's all cool by you, well then, I guess you'll be happier living under theocratic America than I will, so I'm very happy for you.

Ahmadinejad by the way, is not a part of any religious hierarchy. He's simply the head of the Iranian state. He doesn't have that much power because real power is vested in the Shiite Clerics, so I think you're lashing out at the wrong target.

I too would like to see an end of that brand of Islam that seeks either direct political power, or seeks to control and dictate to the political structures in predominantly Muslim countries. I'd be happy to see that brand of coercive Islam die off as much as I would like to see it with coercive Catholicism and other brands of "Christianity" that are more dedicated to seeking political power that to promoting the teachings of Jesus.

I personally feel more threatened by authoritarian Christians than by authoritarian Muslims, simply because they have gained so much power and influence in a country that I'm stuck living in, and I don't see a threat of something similar happening with Islam in the near future.

At any rate, I think my views are pretty consistent accross the board. I wonder how consistent your views are (and you might want to inform yourself more about how religious hierarchies operate under Islam).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. Also surprised that it was Ahmadinejad (not part of the religious hierarchy)
who brought you around. You mean you hadn't already been brought around by bin Laden and 9/11, or the myriads of suicide bombings, or the Iranian hostage crises, or the many examples practices common in many Islamic societies that are generally regarded as barbaric (like honor killings, or stoning adulterers or gays to death)? The straw that broke your back was a somewhat bellicose head of an Islamic state (that represents a minority group within Islam) and who has little real power and is not part of the religious hierarchy?

Well, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. Do you put your religion above the Constitution & the rule of law?
Islam is not dictating to our lawmakers how they should vote or which policies they should endorce--the head of the catholic church is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about pro death penalty lawmakers?
Hmmmm, funny hat man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They're just peachy in his book. In fact, they get extra wine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. You mean RatzNazi is gonna place an interdict on us?
Hey brownshirt! Yeah I'm talking to you, Benny. You befoul the faith and its history with your hatred. Go join the ranks of Urban II and Innocent III. Leave us Catholics alone. You've done enough damage. Unam Sanctum my Aunt Fanny...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tax the Catholic Church, then.
They have become a PAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sacraments say Ratz needs to be denied CHOICE!!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. The pope is the leader of that church...he makes the rules
the members follow.

If one doesn't like it, then they can leave. Personally, I think he is a buffoon with all this excommunication talk. But I'm not a Catholic so who the hell am I to say he can't make that rule? Do I think it is damaging? Yes. Do I think it is ridiculous? Yes. But I'm not a member so I don't have a say.

OK...give me an argument why we non-Catholics should even say a thing about this rule.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Because this affects all of us, Catholic and
non-catholic alike. If lawmakers are excommunicated because of votes they cast, what happens to our laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. ignore the excommunication, as have so many other historical leaders
The prime example is the excommunication (twice, 1227 & 1239) of Frederick II of Hohenstaufen by Gregory IX. According to his biographer, after one excommunication, Frederick went back to his electors, pulls the imperial crown out of a storage chest, places it on his head and says (paraphrase): "Am I not still King?"

Excommunication did not seem to slow the kings of the Middle Ages down. Besides, now there are alternatives, like the Episcopal Church (known to some as "catholic lite", or even -horrors- the Methodists, which could be called "episcopalian lite"). Pope Ratzi seems to have forgotten that his church is no longer the only game in town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. Shades of JFK
People afraid to vote for a catholic because they thought he'd take orders from the Pope...

It's much better apparently to just hear voices in your head and say that God is speaking directly to you and telling you to invade a middle eastern country or something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Because He Wants To Make It The Catholic Position the LAW and Impose It On Us All!
That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
35. If we had had a Pope like that in the early 60's
Kennedy would never have been elected President.

In those enlightened days, people in this country were genuinely concerned at the notion that a foreign religious authority might dictate this country's policies through an elected official with an alliegance to them.

I'm glad that we had a President Kennedy, and I'm sorry that we're not likely to do so again under our current circumstances. But I should keep my mouth shut about that sort of thing, since I'm only an American and not a Catholic. Whether or not we ever get an enlightened Democratic Catholic in the WH again is of no concern to me. The fact that these policies helped undermine Kerry in his presidential run, and may have helped tip the scales against him, leaving us with four more years of Bush is also none of my concern, not being a Catholic.

I'm glad that you've enlightened me. I feel so much better now.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. JFK had to ensure the American people that he would not take orders from the Pope
But that was back in the day when people understood that the church was for your religious activities and the government was for governing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. He's the Decider! The Commander Guy... Hey, it's hard work being
one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. I really, really miss Pope John XXIII. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Sigh. Me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Clerics going political need to pay taxes on property
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Governments who systematically deny human rights to half the worlds' population
Don't deserve any special social, cultural or diplomatic consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ratzinger should read what Jesus said in the book of Matthew, Chapter 7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh NO!
:scared: :scared: No heaven for you Buster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. Why would any sane adult allow themselves to be manipulated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. His church, his rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. It really isn't -- it doesn't completely work that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Ok then, what are the limits to his authority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. Our country, our rules.
Edited on Thu May-10-07 11:07 AM by Crunchy Frog
I think we're going to have to pass a law that says no one can hold political office if they place a greater allegiance to a foreign religious authority (or any foreign entity) than they do to this country and its laws.

I'm not anxious to return to the time when all of "Christendom" was ultimately under the political authority of the papacy. Steps need to be taken to prevent such an eventuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. yeah but i can condemn his interference in american politics and his religion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
25. The Pope should be denied air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. Also those pro-war and pro-death penalty?
Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
28. the pope is a sexist homophobic asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Amen to that (hehe). And the scary part is...
...without much effort, you can find a handful of religions MORE bigited than Catholicism. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. tell me about it. its illegal to be gay in india.
its just that the pope is also spreading his teachings to poor countries where his stance against condoms is truly a killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. And one-celled beings, and fetuses without brains, have souls.
By jove, THAT makes me want to strangle somebody.

Teh stupid. It hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
41. How about those dating congressional pages mr pope?? STFU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. I think the Catholic church has already made it abundantly clear
that pederasty is not an excommunicable offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
45. Left to him he's reintroduce the feudal order
That fugger is crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
46. The Pope is an idiot...
'nuff said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
47. I said it yesterday and I'll say it again...Fuck the Pope
and the Popemobile he rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC