Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times Editorial - "BP Begins to Ante Up"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:15 PM
Original message
NY Times Editorial - "BP Begins to Ante Up"
I am glad the $20 billion is not a cap on overall liability. But the real question, aside from this escrow, is what will the U.S. Supreme Court due with damages awards? John Roberts reduced damages in the Exxon Valdez case.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/opinion/17thu1.html?hp


Given the size of the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, we suspect that $20 billion may not be enough to compensate all of the people whose lives and futures have been derailed by the spill. But it’s a good start.

It took days of very public pressure from President Obama and countless hours of private negotiations, but BP finally agreed on Wednesday to put $20 billion in an independently managed compensation fund. After meeting with the company’s top executives at the White House, Mr. Obama stressed that the amount is not a ceiling on BP’s obligations, which by some estimates could exceed $40 billion when the costs of cleaning the spill and restoring the gulf’s damaged ecosystem are also factored in.

“The people of the gulf have my commitment that BP will meet its obligations,” the president declared, adding that the agreement would not pre-empt any claims in court. BP did not publicly address the issue of a cap, but its chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg, did apologize “to the American people” and vowed to “look after the people affected” and “repair the damage to this region and the economy.”

* * *

When President Obama first started pressing for an escrow fund, and a suspension of dividend payments to BP’s shareholders, the company pushed back hard, rallying British politicians to argue that they were being unfairly roughed up by the Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. They should have "began to ante up" in the planning stages for the well.
You know.

Relief wells
standby cleanup ships, crews and equipment
reserve fund for cleanup


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why weren't they required to post a bond to cover possible environmental damage?
Probably because the bush administration let them off the hook.

And also because, let's face it, no amount that anybody could have assessed, would have been sufficient to cover this catastrophe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure the 5-4 majority at U.S. Supreme Court Inc. already has their plan in place......
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 06:57 AM by marmar
...... and I strongly suspect it won't be in favor of those receiving the payments.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. It may be too late? Damage done while we slept
I am so pessimistic today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC