Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a better word the media could use for repugs than 'conservative?'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:08 AM
Original message
Is there a better word the media could use for repugs than 'conservative?'
Whenever I hear a Palin or Bush or a Romney or a Huck-a-buck described as a "conservative" it makes my skin crawl.
Maybe it is the word purist in me, but the only thing conservative about these clowns is - well I can't think of anything.

When I think of conservatives, I think of those who save things, those who want to make things last such as the environment or a savings account. Let's face it, those who are called conservative in this country are some of the biggest spendthrifts the world has ever seen. Not only monetary spendthrifts, but also in terms of resources.

Anybody got a good word that could be used in the place of 'conservative' that could better sum up the "blow the people's money and invoke religion and patriotism to cover it up, transfer the wealth from the poor to the rich" party the Republicans truly are?
Fascism comes immediately to mind, but we all know what problems saying that word causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheapskates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. How about clueless a--holes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hellspawn
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Greedmongers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jingoistic Christofascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Regressive? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Authoritarians. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here in the US we love cheap labels
Complexity isn't one of our strong points.

Personally I think it's good to be somewhat "conservative" (as defined in the dictionary, not the news media).

I also believe it's a virtue to be "liberal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Reactionary....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Those who support corporations in the name of pining for values that never were.
As opposed to the DLC who just forsake that "values that never were" nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. reactionary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. At my house..we don't like the use of the word "repugs"
I own two pugs...and they consider use of that word as an insult..or so they've told me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ass Holes
Selfish ass holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. They certainly don't "conserve" ... more like they're "exploitatives"
Using who and what ever they can to meet their own ends? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. "Regressives"
..at least it is more accurate..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. Scheming Thieves and their Dupes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Demonic Pieces of Rancid Dog Shit
Though that would be insulting to dog shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. Fascists
They would prefer government to be run by big business, than by civil servants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeK Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. radical extremists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jp11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. Nothing fits correctly
as not all of them fall under that description, a first thought that came to my mind but that doesn't fit what you want to sum up is narrow minded. After that I thought of crusaders, again not all of them fit that and in my use of crusader I mean those that fit your summary, the ones that took advantage of a religious 'call' to kill, exploit and better their own lives by ruining others.

Anyway I always saw the liberal/conservative labels as being for social issues primarily and the rest gets tossed in with them for the party views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
22. "Assholes" comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
23. Arrogant Simplistic Sophomoric Egotistical Sinecures n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. Radical Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riley18 Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
25. I think of them as treasonous bastards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. Conservative is a good term. It includes corporatist & free market Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yes, but it would be at least one of the seven words you can't say on TV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
28. fascists, psychopaths, traitors, inmates
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 09:53 AM by blm
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
29. Authoritarian, reactionary, regressives, or radical regressives depending on how far
down the rabbit hole they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
30. The accurate political science term is "reactionary"
But then, that stuff eggheads learn in universities is so 20th Century....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
31. Interesting point. A few months ago, I posted the following:
'...as someone from a different system, I am struck by the rather different use of 'conservative' in American than in much Europaean politics. Here, it mostly means the moderate right and usually excludes true extremists (though some of the latter do slip through the net!) Americans appear to use the term both for the mainstream right and for the far right. On the whole, the equivalents of 'teabaggers' here would not be referred to simply as 'conservative'; they might or might not vote for the mainstream Conservative Party, but such extreme views are called *right-wing*, not conservative. I would describe Blue Dog Democrats and moderate Republicans as *conservatives*; Pat Buchanan and Michele Bachmann and Senator DeMented are not *conservatives* but at least borderline fascists. I wonder if this broad use of the term 'conservative' helps to blur distinctions between moderate and extreme right-wingers, and encourages some liberals to think that common ground can be made with the latter?'



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC