ORDagnabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 05:52 PM
Original message |
how bout ignoring McChrystal's resignation and bring him up on charges within the military for |
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He broke the rules. He should pay.
|
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
2. At his rank, resignation is the way it is done. |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 06:15 PM by RC
Or be fired. That's it.
Generals are treated differently than enlisted.
|
stevedeshazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'd like to agree, but I don't. |
|
It is of utmost importance for the President to fire this ass, because if he doesn't and takes your suggestion, the right-wing media will bleat incessantly how the President is "weak".
Most importantly, firing the general emphasizes civilian control over the military to the public. This principle cannot be overemphasized.
Would be sweet to watch on teevee, though.
:)
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. fire him live on teevee |
Dragonfli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Bringing people up on charges is only for the "small people" |
|
As far as torture and treason goes the policy of the last 2 administrations is "some folks are more equal than others" and moving on without charges is the way the large people are treated.
There is no rule of law anymore. That has already been decided apparently.
|
ORDagnabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
a kennedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message |
7. aiding the enemy...... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message |