Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN's Blitzer asked Boehner about new Iraq timeline, but not about previous one, now expired

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:27 AM
Original message
CNN's Blitzer asked Boehner about new Iraq timeline, but not about previous one, now expired
http://mediamatters.org/items/200705100007?f=h_topic

On the May 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer asked House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) to explain what he meant when he said on May 6, "By the time we get to September, October, members are going to want to know how well this is working," which Blitzer said was Boehner's reference "to the new strategy in trying to deal with the security situation in Baghdad and elsewhere in Iraq." But Blitzer did not ask Boehner to reconcile that statement with one -- as Media Matters for America has documented -- that Boehner made during a January appearance on CNN, in which Boehner set a different timeline regarding the war's progress, for a period of time that has already passed. On the January 23 edition of CNN Newsroom, Boehner told CNN congressional correspondent Andrea Koppel: "I think it will be rather clear in the next 60 to 90 days as to whether {Bush's} plan is going to work."

Also, during the May 9 edition of Fox News' Special Report, Fox News congressional correspondent Major Garrett reported on Boehner's May 6 statement without also noting that Boehner had laid out a timeline of just "60 to 90 days" in January. Garrett stated, "Boehner told Fox September is the time to judge the surge," and went on to air a clip of Boehner in which the congressman said: "We'll know in September how well this plan is going, whether it should continue."

As Media Matters noted, in their May 8 coverage of the Iraq war funding debate, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and the Associated Press all cited Boehner's statement that members of Congress will want to see results from Bush's troop increase by September or October, without noting his January 23 "60 to 90 days" declaration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very good point
And just think, we used to have real news organizations that did fact checking just like this before they went to press or on the air. But now the lies just get repeated unchallenged, with but a relative few of us made aware of the deceptions by Media Matters.

So according to Boehner it's time right now to decide if the surge worked or not. It's not surprising to have this moving target but it's good to see them nailed down on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. September - "or October" - an automatic extra month tacked on
Then it'll be "the end of the year"... then "after the first of the year"...
And on and on and f*cking ON.... :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC